Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2259 |
Total number of notes: | 8590 |
I'm trying to create a table of MAC parameters specified through SMT. I would like confirmation of the values that are already input, and any contributions to the blank spots would be appreciated. MAC Parameters Specified Through SMT. ITEM DESCRIPTION BASE DEFAULT VALUE 1 Individual_MAC_address(16bit) O xxxxxx 2 Individual_MAC_address(48bit) O xxxxxx 3 group_MAC_address O xxxxxx 4 T_Min_value M <4.0ms 5 T_Max_value M >165ms 6 TVX_value M 2.35ms 7 T_Req_value M >T_Min <T_Max 8 T_Neg_value M 8ms 9 T_Pri_value M ?? 10 Indicate_for_own_frame M ?? 11 Indicate_for_rcv_only_good_frame M ?? Thanks Phil.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1355.1 | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, B-16504 | Wed Jun 01 1994 18:45 | 36 | |
I'm trying to figure out what you used to create that list, or what you would do with it afterwards. The format looks a bit like a PICS, but it doesn't look like a valid or meaningful PICS. Anyway, the answers are: 1 Individual_MAC_address(16bit) O NOT SUPPORTED 2 Individual_MAC_address(48bit) O from address ROM 3 group_MAC_address O supplied by application 4 T_Min_value M fixed 4 ms 5 T_Max_value M fixed 167.77224 ms 6 TVX_value M set by mgmt, def=2.62 ms 7 T_Req_value M set by mgmt, def=8 ms 8 T_Neg_value M computed by MAC 9 T_Pri_value M NOT SUPPORTED NOTE: that can't be "M"; it's clearly labelled in the standard as optional. 10 Indicate_for_own_frame M huh? 11 Indicate_for_rcv_only_good_frame M huh? Re the last two: normal drivers only deliver good frames, and not own frames. The MAC chip can be put into a mode where it does receive own frames, but this is for loopback testing only. The hardware delivers bad frames along with good ones; it's the driver that discards the bad ones (and counts them). paul | |||||
1355.2 | CAATS::VINES | Thu Jun 02 1994 15:37 | 8 | ||
Thanks for the info Paul. Actually, the data in note .0 originated from a third party voice switch that will reside on the LAN. I want to make some comparatives between DEC's and its SMT parameters to see if there are any differences, between them. Phil | |||||
1355.3 | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, B-16504 | Thu Jun 02 1994 18:23 | 4 | |
I'm still puzzled. If you find differences, what conclusions would you draw from them? paul |