[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
|
Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
|
Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2259 |
Total number of notes: | 8590 |
1296.0. "any ideas welcome: lat,fddi,decbridge,ethernet??" by TOHOPE::WSA003::CHURCHE_J (Nothing endures but change) Tue Mar 29 1994 09:22
<<< NOTED::DISK$NOTES9:[NOTES$LIBRARY_9OF4]PWDOSWINV5.NOTE;2 >>>
-< PATHWORKS for DOS and Windows Version 5.x >-
================================================================================
Note 567.0 LAT, FDDI, DECbridge 650, PW V4.1 client...NOT No replies
TOHOPE::WSA003::CHURCHE_J "Nothing endures but chan" 21 lines 28-MAR-1994 16:40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This fellow that I am talking to has LAT V4.1.17x with a DE200 card
doing a remote boot from a V4.x server. It is trying to talk to a
server on an FDDI network through a DECbridge 650. The specific
problem that he is seeing is this: he can't do a LAT connect from the
PC client to the FDDI server (a VAX 7xxx), unless he defines the server
node with its hardware address. If we define the server using the
usual LATCP add area.node name name, it won't work and comes back with
service not known. DECnet is started on the FDDI controller.
Does anyone know why this isn't working like we would expect? Why
can't the PW V4.1 pc client see the FDDI server via the AA... address?
(Other VMS based system on the same ethernet segment are able to set
host/lat to this FDDI node just fine.)
Thanks,
jc
pw/alf
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1296.1 | | 29563::WSA003::CHURCHE_J | Nothing endures but change | Tue Mar 29 1994 14:35 | 5 |
|
Found the answer in NOTED::LAT, #4605.
jc
|