| I'm surprised it would say that.
It makes perfect sense as a guideline, but it is NOT valid as a restriction.
If you want to build "straightforward" configurations, guidelines are helpful
in constructing valid networks without lots of analysis or measurement. But
the actual rules are those defined in the ANSI standard, and those are
expressed in terms of distance, loss, and bandwidth.
If the configuration meets the loss and bandwidth requirements (and distance,
in the MMF case, though that's specified primarily to help guarantee the
other two) then it is legitimate. In particular, splices and patches are
sources of loss, so if you have a lot of them you MAY have a loss problem.
So measure it. If the measurement says ok, it's ok.
paul
|
| You also have a multi-vendor situation to deal with in terms of
understanding the limits of the power budget and system bandwidth.
I called Synoptics (1-800-PRO-NTWK) and asked about the limits of their
SMF product. They support 20 km maximum link lengths. We support up to
40 km link lengths, so I believe there is no bandwidth limitation with
this shorter distance of 10 miles (16 km). The optical transmit
power of their device is -20 dBm (minimum) and the receiver sensitivity
is -31 dBm (minimum).
Using these values and the corresponding numbers for our product (-8
dBm and -30 dBm), the worst case power budget occurs between their
transmitter (-20 dBm) and our receiver (-30), providing 10 dB for a
loss budget. If the customers installation has less than 10 dB of
loss, including fiber, patch panels, etc, then the link should work.
We have an installation guide for our single-mode products that
contains more detail. I think there is a note in this conference that
points to on on-line location. If not, let me know and I'll post it.
Richard Kirk
Networks Engineering
Optical PMD Project Leader
LEVERS::KIRK
DTN 226-7048
|