T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1150.1 | | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, B-16504 | Tue Nov 16 1993 16:20 | 9 |
| It's possible for a station to send a frame that sets off the LCT. The more
common cause is a bad cable or transceivers, of course. But LCT is designed
in such a way that the symptoms of trouble are isolated to one connection.
Any error pattern that LCT reacts to is NOT propagated to other ports; any
data pattern that does propagate is one that LCT does not object to. So
a situation where a problem on one port causes all the others to go into a
bad state sounds like a concentrator problem.
paul
|
1150.2 | Concentrator has been replaced already | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Wed Nov 17 1993 09:12 | 14 |
| Paul,
Thanks for the prompt reply. The "bad Sun" was moved numerous times to
different port cards and the problem followed it. Finally, the entire
concentrator was replaced. The problem still exists. That doesn't
mean that the replacement concentrator was a good one, so I'll
recommend that yet another concentrator be put in place if this happens
again.
As a side note, the "bad Sun's" FDDI controller was replaced a couple
of days ago. So far, no problems. Fiber cables have not been
replaced.\
Thanks,
Dan
|
1150.3 | | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, B-16504 | Wed Nov 17 1993 15:24 | 12 |
| Strange.
Note that it is certainly possible (and given how things "follow the Sun"
extremely likely) that the original problem where one port goes red is the
Sun's fault. In general, an LEM/LCT error can be caused by either endpoint
of that connection, or the cabling in between.
But that doesn't explain the other ports going bad as well. There may be
a bug somewhere that's triggered by some strange condition, and fixing the
original trigger made everything work...
paul
|
1150.4 | LCT / card problem went away with V3.3 | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Thu Dec 02 1993 21:21 | 10 |
| We upgraded the firmware to V3.3 and the problem went away. Weird,
because, from what Paul tells us, there was nothing in V3.3 that should
have fixed such a problem.
Does anyone have the name of the DEFCN (DECconc500) product manager?
I'd like to have that group pursue this further.
Thanks,
Dan
|
1150.5 | | QUIVER::STEFANI | Have the # for the Mars Observer? | Thu Dec 02 1993 21:46 | 6 |
| >>Does anyone have the name of the DEFCN (DECconc500) product manager?
I believe Sharon Oneill (DELNI::ONEILL) is the product manager for all
of the FDDI concentrators.
- Larry
|
1150.6 | what frames causes LCT? | NPSS::TAYLOR | | Wed Jun 01 1994 15:28 | 9 |
|
re: .1
Paul,
What type of frame could set of the LCT?
wayne
|
1150.7 | | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, B-16504 | Wed Jun 01 1994 17:10 | 13 |
| There's no way for software to generate frames that trigger LCT, if the hardware
is designed with even modest amount of competence. It would take a really
amazing hardware bug to make this possible.
Basically, LCT triggers on bit patterns that will not be sent by a conforming
PHY chip. Since bit errors on the medium can produce all possible bit patterns,
the arrival of invalid patterns is an indication of bit errors. To first
approximation, a legal bit pattern on the wire that is hit by a bit error has
roughly a 33% change of being turned into an illegal bit pattern (the other
alternative being a legal but different bit pattern, something that the CRC
check in the receiving station will see but LCT will not).
paul
|