[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::fddi

Title:FDDI - The Next Generation
Moderator:NETCAD::STEFANI
Created:Thu Apr 27 1989
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2259
Total number of notes:8590

979.0. "DEMFA and shared XMI adapter" by HGOVC::INDO03::FUNGSIONG (Digital Indonesia - Networks) Wed Jun 02 1993 06:13

    Hi,
    
    This might be a very simple question. A VAX 7610 can support up to 4
    XMI bus (100 Mbytes/sec); each XMI has 12 slots. A DEC FDDIcontroller
    400 can be installed in one of these 12 slots.
    
    Is it reasonable to say that if the same XMI adapter is shared by
    tapes, disks, etc., the throughput of the FDDI controller might not
    reach 100 Mbit/second? My customer is going to install a FDDIcontroller
    and would like to know whether adding a dedicated XMI adapter for the
    controller is necessary.
    
    BTW, is there any formal document specifying this throughput achieved
    by DEMFA (FDDIcontroller 400)?
    
    Any input will be greatly appreciated.
    
    Thanks and Regards,
    Fung Siong
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
979.1XMI is much faster than DEMFAWONDER::WILLARDMon Aug 30 1993 18:0622
	Pardon the tardy response - I don't read this notesfile often.

	The XMI is good for ~100 MByte/s, the DEMFA is ~12 MByte/s, and
	all other XMI I/O widgets are slower than the DEMFA.  You can
	put several I/O widgets on the XMI with concurrent activity
	with no noticeable impact on the DEMFA's performance, because
	the DEMFA has some overlap and buffering on DMA and because the
	XMI is pended and works correctly even when saturated.

	For a crude approximation assume each DEMFA or DWMBB is a 12 MB/s load,
	each CIXCD is a 8 MB/s load, each DWMVA or KCM44 or KDM70 or KFMSA is
	a 6 MB/s load, and each DEMNA is a 1 MB/s load.  If the total load
	is <50 MB/s, you are pretty safe; else, you may want to consider
	more details (performance differences due to transfer sizes and
	transfer directions and huge performance differences due to the
	workload not being able to use I/O widgets to rated capacity), or
	you may simply decide to buy another XMI to reduce the risk.

	Of course, there is no guarantee that your workload will achieve
	100 Mbit/s via the DEMFA, regardless of other XMI loads.

Cheers, Bob
979.2KONING::KONINGPaul Koning, A-13683Tue Aug 31 1993 13:096
The preceding doesn't take into account descriptor access overhead.  For large
packets you should have plenty of margin, but for minimum size packets you
will have very little.  If you want good performance, always use the biggest
packet size you can.

	paul