[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::fddi

Title:FDDI - The Next Generation
Moderator:NETCAD::STEFANI
Created:Thu Apr 27 1989
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2259
Total number of notes:8590

927.0. "Single and Multimode fiber?" by STAOFF::DERISE (I'm goin' to Disney Land!) Wed Apr 14 1993 12:45

    Is it possible, and supported, to use both single-mode and multimode
    fiber in a FDDI network, specifically between concentrators?  If it is
    okay to do this, what are the implications for:
    
    - maximum ring distance?
    - power budget loss?
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
927.1KONING::KONINGPaul Koning, A-13683Wed Apr 14 1993 17:5841
Yes, absolutely.

There are two quite separate considerations you need to deal with:

1. Requirements on the individual connections.  A connection is the pair of
   links between two ports.  In other words, the duplex fiber, or thinwire
   coax, or whatever, between a concentrator port and an adapter is a 
   connection.

2. Requirements on the ring as a whole.

You can choose the type of medium for each connection totally independently
from every other connection.  There may be some packaging limitations -- for
example, the thinwire ports on the concentrator come 6 at a time on a card.
But there are NO rules anywhere that require a particular medium type just
because some particular medium was used elsewhere in the ring.  You do need
to use the same for both links of the connection.  In other words, if you
use multimode fiber from the M port transmitter to the workstation receiver,
the fiber going from that same workstation's transmitter to the M port receiver
must also be multimode.  That shouldn't be a surprise -- or a limitation.

If you look in the Network Buyer's Guide, you'll see concentrator line cards
that have singlemode A, multimode B ports, or vice versa.  You would use  those
if one connection needs to go a long way but the other does not.

For each medium you might use in a connection there are limitations specific
to that medium for distance etc.  For example, multimode connections are
limited to 2 km; singlemode ones to about 40 km (though the real limiting
factor is attenuation); coax to 100 meters or whatever, and so on.  Again, the
rules for each individual connection depend ONLY on what medium is used for
THAT connection.

As for the requirements on the ring as a whole, the main one is that the
total circumference must be such that the ring latency does not exceed D_Max
(1.617 ms).  If the circumference is close to 200 km, you need to look into
this carefully; if you also have a high station count you may be over the limit.
(Conversely, if you're REALLY careful you can go somewhat over 200 km so long
as there are only a few stations.  If you don't understand precisely how to
calculate ring latency, do not attempt to design such configuration!)

	paul
927.2Thanks much!STAOFF::DERISEI'm goin' to Disney Land!Thu Apr 15 1993 09:067
    Thanks for the speedy reply!
    
    As for calculating the Ring circumference - ring latency - can you give
    me a pointer to a document that discusses this, and what the guidelines
    and variables, formula if one exists, to do this?  That would be great!
    
    Angelo
927.3KONING::KONINGPaul Koning, A-13683Thu Apr 15 1993 11:4811
Ring latency is in principle a simple matter.  Add up all the link lengths
that make up the ring.  (Be sure to allow for lengthening caused by wrap!)
Convert length to delay (by dividing by the propagation speed).  If you're
using media with significantly different propagation speeds, do the arithmetic
separately for each type and add the results.  Now you have the contribution
from the links themselves.  Add to that the contribution from the stations;
you'll need to know the latency of each station.  One microsecond is a likely
number, but some are lower and some may be higher.  Add everything, and you
have the answer!

	paul
927.4Thank you!SUBWAY::DERISEI'm goin' to Disney Land!Fri Apr 16 1993 11:131