[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
|
Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
|
Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2259 |
Total number of notes: | 8590 |
501.0. "Disaster Tolerant FDDI Configuration" by SYORPD::DEEP (Bob Deep @SYO, DTN 256-5708) Mon Mar 16 1992 11:19
I have a customer who is building defense systems for the US Navy and is
looking to expand one of their systems in a distributed environment. The
network must be capable of sustaining itself even if multiple segments
are destroyed.
Using FDDI, the customer has proposed the following configuration (simplified
version):
|---| |---|
| A1 B1 | Concentrator 1
| M11 M12 |
| | | |
| A2 B2 | Concentrator 2
| M21 M22 |
| | | |
| A3 B3 | Concentrator 3
| M31 M32 |
|___| |___|
Secondary Primary
Ring Ring
Is this a valid configuiration? Will the ring initialize?
If so, then lets examine the following failover scenarios...
For Example, the case of a link failure betwee B3 and M22:
|---| |---|
| A1 B1 | Concentrator 1
| M11 M12 |
| | | |
| A2 B2 | Concentrator 2
| M21 M22 |
| | * |
| A3 B3 | Concentrator 3
| M31 M32 |
|___| |___|
In this scenario, when B3 detects a failure, A3 should activate and pass data?
If a second failure occurs, for example between B2 and M12:
|---| |---|
| A1 B1 | Concentrator 1
| M11 M12 |
| | * |
| A2 B2 | Concentrator 2
| M21 M22 |
| | * |
| A3 B3 | Concentrator 3
| M31 M32 |
|___| |___|
Now A2 should activate and pass data?
Is the ring still valid after these failures? (assuming it was valid to begin
with.)
Thanks in advance... Bob
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
501.1 | | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, NI1D | Mon Mar 16 1992 17:46 | 5 |
| Being discussed offline... this looks like "global hold" which is a Safenet
thing that is allowed by FDDI but way outside the mainline and not a particularly
good solution to the problem. More later.
paul
|