[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::fddi

Title:FDDI - The Next Generation
Moderator:NETCAD::STEFANI
Created:Thu Apr 27 1989
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2259
Total number of notes:8590

501.0. "Disaster Tolerant FDDI Configuration" by SYORPD::DEEP (Bob Deep @SYO, DTN 256-5708) Mon Mar 16 1992 11:19

I have a customer who is building defense systems for the US Navy and is 
looking to expand one of their systems in a distributed environment.  The
network must be capable of sustaining itself even if multiple segments
are destroyed.

Using FDDI, the customer has proposed the following configuration (simplified 
version):


                            |---|       |---|
                            |   A1      B1  |   Concentrator 1
                            |   M11     M12 |
                            |   |       |   |
                            |   A2      B2  |   Concentrator 2
                            |   M21     M22 |
                            |   |       |   |
                            |   A3      B3  |   Concentrator 3
                            |   M31     M32 |
                            |___|       |___|
			  Secondary    Primary
			    Ring	Ring


Is this a valid configuiration?   Will the ring initialize?

If so, then lets examine the following failover scenarios...

For Example, the case of a link failure betwee B3 and M22:

                            |---|       |---|
                            |   A1      B1  |   Concentrator 1
                            |   M11     M12 |
                            |   |       |   |
                            |   A2      B2  |   Concentrator 2
                            |   M21     M22 |
                            |   |       *   |
                            |   A3      B3  |   Concentrator 3
                            |   M31     M32 |
                            |___|       |___|

In this scenario, when B3 detects a failure, A3 should activate and pass data?

If a second failure occurs, for example between B2 and M12:


                            |---|       |---|
                            |   A1      B1  |   Concentrator 1
                            |   M11     M12 |
                            |   |       *   |
                            |   A2      B2  |   Concentrator 2
                            |   M21     M22 |
                            |   |       *   |
                            |   A3      B3  |   Concentrator 3
                            |   M31     M32 |
                            |___|       |___|

Now A2 should activate and pass data?

Is the ring still valid after these failures?  (assuming it was valid to begin
with.)

Thanks in advance...   Bob
			
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
501.1KONING::KONINGPaul Koning, NI1DMon Mar 16 1992 17:465
Being discussed offline... this looks like "global hold" which is a Safenet
thing that is allowed by FDDI but way outside the mainline and not a particularly
good solution to the problem.  More later.

	paul