| Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
| Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
| Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2259 |
| Total number of notes: | 8590 |
For those who are wondering, here is what happened at the last TP-PMD
meeting, on Feb 19 1992, in Austin TX.
The committee decided to develop a standard for 150 ohm STP and 100
Ohm Category 5 UTP. Datagrade UTP is a name frequently used as a
synonym for Category 5 cable. The category refers to the EIA/TIA
categorization of the cable. The committee has spent the last 4 months
looking at whether it is possible to develop a satisfactory standard
for more than the two cable types, and has decided that it is not possible
at this time, so forward progress should be made.
The committee also decided that it should continue to hear information
on the results of work being done to run FDDI over EIA/TIA category 3
cables. These are the type of cables specified for 10Base-T installations.
This is in response to the desire to develop a good standard for those
cables; good meaning that it can support 100 meter distances, have good
error rates, etc, etc, etc. Such a standard will probably require
digital signal processing chipsets. There is still a lot of preliminary
work to be done in this area.
The committee hopes to be able to choose the encoding technique for the
STP/Category 5 standard at its next meeting. The choice will be between
the MLT-3 and pre-emphasized NRZI coding schemes, unless someone shows
up with something of such importance that people vote for it. After the
coding is chosen, the committee will move on to the details of
scrambling, connectors, etc. While the goal is to try to get a standard
ballotted by December 1992, this is becoming less likely. I won't
hazard a guess as to when a standard will be ready, but I don't expect
it to be too much of a slip beyond December.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 490.1 | How will this standard affect our current ST products ?? | RT95::NICHOLS | Network Consultant dtn 274-6933 | Thu Mar 12 1992 10:31 | 3 |
A couple of customers have asked about our current ST offering inlight of this standard. Obviously we will adher to the final standard but what sort of changes will this necesitate on our ST card ?? | |||||
| 490.2 | LEVERS::B_CRONIN | Fri Mar 13 1992 14:45 | 3 | ||
Its too early to guess. Basically, we will need to redesign the
existing stp card. (I assume here that you meant STP, not ST as in
optical connector).
| |||||
| 490.3 | Level 5 for customers ? | HGOVC::LEUNGWINGKIN | Fri Mar 27 1992 21:00 | 13 | |
Hi,
We are now helping some of our customers to plan their cabling network
and they are very interested in FDDI on UTP. Implementation will be
started by the end of this year.
Do you think level 5 UTP is a good choice for them ? Fiber is not
acceptable as it is too expensive.
Thanks.
Kin
| |||||
| 490.4 | Category 5 is more correct than any other | LEVERS::B_CRONIN | Wed Apr 01 1992 09:54 | 20 | |
Here's what you want to tell the customer.
1) The copper FDDI standard will be using category 5 cable, so they
will be consistent with the standard's requirements for UTP cable.
Category 5 is the best choice for a UTP cable.
2) If their installation is prone to excessive noise hits, then they
will still have a chance that FDDI on copper wouldn't work for them,
even with the category 5 UTP. The actual numbers are still being
developed, so I can't yet tell you how to test for this. But, keep in
mind that link error rates of 1E-12 correspond to one bit in error
every three hours, per link.
3) Now, if they are in the typical edge city office environment, they
will probably be safe. BUT, at this point we are not just blanketly
telling people to pull in the category 5 cable. As soon as the noise
numbers can be explained, we can tell people what environments will or
won't work. In the meantime, they need to make their own call.
| |||||