[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::fddi

Title:FDDI - The Next Generation
Moderator:NETCAD::STEFANI
Created:Thu Apr 27 1989
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2259
Total number of notes:8590

344.0. "Can SMF receiver be damaged by overload?" by COMICS::WOODWARD (Smile!) Mon Sep 09 1991 08:02

Hi,

Our PTT has put in a SMF link between two of our concentrators but have had some
problems with the modules themselves, which prompted the following questions;

1) I know the SMF link requires a minimum 12 DB loss, but if the link is
installed without this minimum can it damage the receiver and what are the
tolerances (ie will -x db simply not work but -y Db actually cause damage)

2) the PTT have also asked what the expected output power of the SMF interface
is and what the input thresholds are - can anyone supply this info please?

Thanks for any info

Steve
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
344.1Watch out for high BERLEVERS::KIRKtis a gift to be simpleMon Sep 09 1991 09:3633
    Hello,
    
    	Some quick answers for your questions.
    
    	1. Overdriving the receiver probably will not damage it, but there
    	will be an unacceptably high Bit Error Rate. This will result in the
    	link being shut down. The minimum 12 dB loss ensures that the
    	receiver is operating within the acceptable range of input power.
    
    	2. The output power of the laser is specified as:
    
    		-8.0 dBm to  -3.25 dBm 
    	
    	The maximum power output is consistent with Class 1 laser safety 
    	requirements, and thus requires no special treatment. Class 1 
    	laser systems are considered as inherently safe.
    
    	   The receiver input levels must be within the range of:
    
    		-30 dBm  to  -14 dBm
    
    	Attempts to operate SMF FDDI links with received optical power
    	greater than -14 dBm, or less than -30 dBm will result in high
    	Bit Error Rates and subsequent shut down of the link.
    
    	
    
    	Regards,
    
    	   Richard L. Kirk
    	   Networks and Communications
    	   FDDI Optical Technology Group
    
344.2Thanks for the answersCOMICS::WOODWARDSmile!Mon Sep 09 1991 10:180