T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
257.1 | SNMP on Bridge and Concentrator. | QUIVER::GALLAGHER | | Thu May 16 1991 12:10 | 40 |
| Raj,
> When will our concentrator and bridges be SNMP manageable? Is there
> any field test software available now for this?
We just ended field test on an SNMP agent for the fddi bridge and
concentrator which supports 'gets'. 'Set' support will be available
in Q2FY92.
> Will SNMP management of these devices be able to achieve everything
> that DECelms do now? If not, what are the management functionalities
> which may not be possible.
Well, almost all objects supported by ELMS will be supported by SNMP.
There are additional objects which are supported by SNMP but not by ELMS.
I say 'almost' because there are some objects made available by ELMs in which
it doesn't make sense to make available via SNMP - because the SNMP Network
Management Station wouldn't know how to use them.
For example, ELMS provides some high level functions like ring mapping.
Our SNMP agent is just providing the raw data. SNMP Network Management
Stations will have to provide the application which reads, munges, and
displays the data. There is no standard (or proposed standard, or draft
standard) in any SNMP mib which provides this functionality.
Management functionalities which are not provided for by objects in the
SNMP mibs may not be possible.
> Other vendors, like Timeplex claim their concentrators are SNMP
> manageable.
We'll soon be able to claim this.
> Can all variables in the FDDI devices, SMT and MAC, be SNMP manageable?
All of the these variables supported by ELMS will be SNMP manageable. We also
support the draft IETF fddi mib. (By the way, the bridge also supports
the draft IETF bridge mib.)
-Shawn
|
257.2 | Will the snmp manageable bridge have an IP address | PRESS1::STUART | Scott Stuart - MARVA Network Sales Support DTN 341-3132 - MARVA District | Mon Jun 03 1991 19:01 | 8 |
| When the DECbridge(s) get an SNMP agent, does that mean that they must have an
IP address?
If yes, how does that address get set, and can it use reverse ARP to get it
from a central server like the management station?
thanks ... scott
|
257.3 | yup | LEVERS::ANIL | | Tue Jun 04 1991 20:37 | 5 |
| Yes, an IP address needs to be assigned, in either one of 2 ways:
a) bootp
b) ELMS
Anil
|
257.4 | thanks ... | PRESS1::STUART | Scott Stuart - MARVA Network Sales Support DTN 341-3132 - MARVA District | Wed Jun 05 1991 10:11 | 0 |
257.5 | There is now a third way | QUIVER::CIARFELLA | When in doubt, mumble. | Wed Jun 05 1991 10:24 | 13 |
| >>Yes, an IP address needs to be assigned, in either one of 2 ways:
>>a) bootp
>>b) ELMS
Three ways ... the IP address can also be set using the DECmcc
Extended LAN Management (DECmcc ELMS) Concentrator and Bridge
Access Modules.
DECmcc ELMS is the follow-on product to DECelms V1.1 (b above).
It provides DECelms functionality in a DECmcc environment and
is intended to replace DECelms.
|
257.6 | | PRSPSU::JACQUOT | Don't step on my blue sued shoe | Wed Sep 02 1992 12:13 | 5 |
| I'have a customer with a big configuration of DC500's DB520's and DB620's.
Everything ok but DB520's doesn't respond to SNMP request (DB620's are ok)
The Firmeware of DB520's is 1.2.1
does anyboy known an anwser ?, thank a lot for any help.
|
257.7 | | LEVERS::ANIL | | Thu Sep 03 1992 11:01 | 4 |
| Look at the SNMP config guide's troubleshooting section. Also, verify
that any port not in use is not left open (has a loopback connector).
Anil
|
257.8 | pointer to SNMP config guide ? | SCHOOL::CARR | | Thu Sep 03 1992 13:29 | 7 |
| Can you provide a pointer to the SNMP
config guide ? If its not available on
the net, how about the full title and
part number ?
Thanks,
Denise
|
257.9 | indirect pointer | BAGELS::LEVY | | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:52 | 3 |
| Directory pointer is in 44.last
File name begins with AA-...
|
257.10 | | LEVERS::ANIL | | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:44 | 3 |
| It's in TNPUBS::PUBLIC$DISK:[PUBLIC.SNMP]SNMP_AGENT_CONFIG.PS
Anil
|
257.11 | | PRSPSU::JACQUOT | Don't step on my blue sued shoe | Wed Sep 23 1992 05:04 | 5 |
| thanks for evrything.
An interesting answer to .6 find in topic 717.*
Bye
Eric
|