T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
251.1 | | KONING::KONING | Lietuva laisva! | Tue May 07 1991 11:05 | 12 |
| Yes, you have to count all the fiber between concentrators and SAS in doing
the total -- with one exception.
All that counts is ACTIVE fiber. When you use "dual homing", the standby
connection does NOT count since it isn't included in the ring. In a dual
homing configuration, count only the active connection to the concentrator.
(I'm assuming the active and standby connection are the same length. If not,
count whichever is longer.)
Yes, single mode fiber has to be counted just as much as multimode fiber.
paul
|
251.2 | | ZPOVC::HWCHOY | Chicken on fire. | Tue May 07 1991 14:01 | 6 |
| However, the fiber on the ring needs counting twice (as it's the dual
ring), and the CONC-to-SAS is only once. This is the right reason to
keep the main ring small and use SMF to extend from a CONC to a remote
CONC or SAS?
thanx again
|
251.3 | cascading tree is depth-traversed? | ZPOVC::HWCHOY | Chicken on fire. | Tue May 07 1991 14:04 | 3 |
| just to confirm, in a cascading tree of CONC, a frame entering the
"root" CONC will depth-traverse the whole tree, before emerging from
the "root" again?
|
251.4 | | KONING::KONING | Lietuva laisva! | Tue May 07 1991 18:40 | 10 |
| Yes, depth first. ("Preorder traversal" is what a computer scientist would
call it.)
The reason the dual ring is counted twice is that it might wrap, which
effectively doubles the distance. That's one reason for recommending a
small dual ring. Another reason is that the dual ring only handles SINGLE
faults: if more than one break occurs, you have a partitioned network.
The tree can handle multiple faults.
paul
|