[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
|
Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
|
Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2259 |
Total number of notes: | 8590 |
222.0. "VAX w. FDDI & Ethernet any problems ?" by HERON::DAHL () Wed Mar 06 1991 10:19
Would this configuration need some special care for the different
protocols (DECnet Ph IV, DECnet/OSI Ph V, SCS, LAT, TCP/IP)?
CON
+-----------+ FDDI Backbone
- - ----------A| |B--------------- - -
- - -----------+ +---------------- - -
| o o o o |
+-+-------+-+
+---------+ | | +-------+
|DECbridge+--+ +----+ VAX |
| 500 | |9/6xxx |
+----+----+ |w. XMI |
| |ctrl. |
| +---+---+
| |
| | Ethernet/802.3
=======O===O====================O====================
|
+----+----+
| Terminal|
| Server |
+---------+
1) Will some of these protocols result in the bridge getting packets
with the same MAC address from both FDDI and Ethernet/802.3 (I don't
think so, but need to check) ? If so, any recommended filtering
for the bridge ?
2) I guess DECnet PH IV only accept one (FDDI preferably)
LAN device to be active. The Ethernet/802.3 adapter would be
put in a standby mode. Right ?
3) How will DECnet/OSI PH V handle this ? Will we need any special
conciderations in terms of Bridge filtering to make this work OK ?
4) I guess that the Ethernet/802.3 adapter could be used for LAT
only traffic, or is the best way to run all protocols through the
FDDI interface, and then let the different protocols failover to
the Ethernet/802.3 adapter if they can ? Any suggestions ?
Regards,
Per
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
222.1 | | KONING::KONING | Lietuva laisva! | Wed Mar 06 1991 13:40 | 3 |
| Answered in Phase V conference.
paul
|