| Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
| Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
| Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2259 |
| Total number of notes: | 8590 |
I assume this will work. The only issue that I can think of is to put the
LB1xx in standby mode so all traffic goes over the DECbridge. I take it the
LB1xx will come up automatically when one of the DECbridges fail.
-----------
! WC !
-----------
/ \
/ \
+ / \ +
+ -------- -------- +
[ ]====!DB 500! !DB 500!====[ ]
+ -------- -------- +
+ +
+ -------- +
[ ]=========!LB 1xx!===========[ ]
+ -------- +
+ +
thanks,
dmm
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150.1 | valid (but overkill) configuration | BAGELS::LEVY | Tue Oct 09 1990 18:26 | 4 | |
Yes, the configuration in .0 will work. The LB1xx can be put in BACKUP
by setting line costs appropriately. Note that for a two DB500
configuration, a DEFCN is not required. (of course, the DB500's aren't
required either! just replace them with an LB200)
| |||||
| 150.2 | Customer likes redundancy, sales likes the $$$. | CGOS01::DMARLOWE | PDP 11: MOV -(PC),-(PC) | Wed Oct 10 1990 02:26 | 9 |
This customer has also refused to buy DECserver 500's because if
one fails then a lot of users are dead whereas if a DECserver 200
fails....
I left out all the other stuff that could go onto the WC.
Thanks.
dmm
| |||||