Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2259 |
Total number of notes: | 8590 |
I have a question about who will do the bit twisting of MAC addresses. With Ethernet using a different ordering of MAC address bits (canonical) to FDDI and .5 the MAC address in ARP packets will not automatically match up between FDDI and Ethernet. After some discussion with various people it would appear that FDDI stations will automatically twist bits so that the ARP packet contains canonical ordering. This will mean that bridges do not have to twist them inside the ARP packet between FDDI and Ethernet. However, will existing 802.5 TCP/IP implementations interwork with this? This would require them to twist the bits at the end station like FDDI. The questions I have therefore are : 1. Am I correct in assuming that our TCP/IP drivers on FDDI twist the MAC address before sending it out on FDDI ? 2. Do existing Token Ring end station implementations of IP twist the MAC address before putting it in ARP? 3. If they don't will the .5 to FDDI bridge have to do it or will there be a scrap in the standards ? 4. How is this handled in OSI (ES-IS 9542) i.e. did ISO define the bit ordering and therefore its done in end stations ?
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
93.1 | KONING::KONING | NI1D @FN42eq | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:51 | 7 | |
1. Yes. 2. I don't think so, but this is being changed. 3. I suspect .5 to FDDI bridges will have to do some hackery to deal with old .5 nodes. 4. OSI has this taken care of. paul |