| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 48.1 | We do it in the bridge | AKO569::JOY | Get a life! | Tue Apr 03 1990 12:19 | 9 | 
|  |     Our bridges will do IP packet fragmentation. It is up to the
    destination nodes to do the reassembly. Our bridges are based on and
    compatible with RFC-791, RFC-792 and RFC-1009. Any third-parties who
    conform to these RFCs will be compatible with our bridges.  Manu Kaycee
    (Quiver::MKAYCEE) can provide you with more info on the fragmentation
    issue.
    
    Debbie
    
 | 
| 48.2 | The bridge will also do Phase V | F104::HERNAN | Peter  Hernan   NCGD-DNC | Thu Apr 12 1990 15:25 | 15 | 
|  | 
  Phase V supports Network layer fragmentation and I understand the FDDI bridge
will be capable of using this facility.
  Once Network Layer fragmentation takes place, at any point in the network
the packets will not be reassembled until they reach the Network Layer of the
destination node.
  The Phase IV Routing Layer does not support packet fragmentation. Therefore,
when a Phase V system, on an FDDI network, is communicating with a Phase IV
system on an Ethernet, the Phase V system will be limited by either the Phase IV
Line or EXEC buffer size.
  regards
 | 
| 48.3 |  | BERN01::DEY | PhV or Big wind, long talk, no rain | Tue Apr 17 1990 14:44 | 10 | 
|  | Peter
>>  The Phase IV Routing Layer does not support packet fragmentation. Therefore,
>>when a Phase V system, on an FDDI network, is communicating with a Phase IV
>>system on an Ethernet, the Phase V system will be limited by either the Phase IV
>>Line or EXEC buffer size.
Do you mean, that in the transport negotiation between Ph V and Ph IV. the 
smallest buffer size is chosen ? and therefore no use of the max FDDI buffer
size is made.
 | 
| 48.4 |  | KONING::KONING | NI1D @FN42eq | Wed Apr 18 1990 09:51 | 3 | 
|  | That's right.
	paul
 |