|
Hi Managers,
I would like to thank all of you for getting your replies to me. I would
also like to apologize the delay in responding to you with the results. The
results showed that the league is between Cautious and Hazardous. The actual
results are listed below.
The board would like to take steps to reduce the level of rough play. To
this end, we would like to ask for suggestions on reducing the level of rough
play. Please send E-mail to me (CNTROL::HOWORTH) concering suggestions to
help reduce the roughness.
We would also like ALL managers to remind their team that this is a
recreational league.
I will still take input from individuals, and report the results if more
people respond.
Thanks,
Nick H.
League Secretary
Quality of referreeing during
the indoor season to date: Level of rough play:
10 - Excelent 10 - Violent
9 9
8 - Good 8 - Dangerous
7 7
6 - Fair 6 - Hazardous
5 - Average 5
4 - Mediocre 4 - Cautious
3 3
2 - Poor 2 - Polite
1 1
0 - Pathetic 0 - Contact-Free
Responses for the 8 teams:
Average . . . . . . . . . 5.875 . . . . . . . . . . 5.5
Std Dev . . . . . . . . . 1.808 . . . . . . . . . . 1.069
I received results from 12 individuals. Most of these individual results are
from two specific teams, so these results are skewed towards those teams
(i.e. the population sampled is not evenly distributed. With that said, the
ratings for the individuals were slightly lower.
Responses for 12 individuals:
Average . . . . . . . . . 5.333 . . . . . . . . . . 5.167
Std Dev . . . . . . . . . 1.497 . . . . . . . . . . 1.850
|