| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 962.1 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Mon Dec 11 1995 11:29 | 7 |
| I always had the sense that the minutes were more-or-less chronological.
I note in these that two of the participants (Larry and Tom?) left the
meeting at around 6:30, but that the meeting didn't adjourn until almost
an hour later. It's not clear what transpired during that last hour.
Can an attendee who stayed till the end shed some light on that?
|
| 962.2 | The topic was mentioned, but not the details | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Mon Dec 11 1995 12:04 | 14 |
| RE: .1
>> Can an attendee who stayed till the end shed some light on that?
The minutes list the topic of discussion.
From the minutes:
>> * It was proposed by Mr. Gillett and seconded by Ms. Ritchie to accept
>> management's recommendation of paying a bonus dividend/interest refund for
>> 1995. Motion carried unanimously.
Elaine
|
| 962.3 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Mon Dec 11 1995 13:35 | 3 |
| Oh - OK. As no discussion was even mentioned, I guess I had assumed that
the motion was proposed, seconded and voted upon without discussion.
|
| 962.4 | The don't ask me to do it often... | WAYLAY::GORDON | Tired of driving... | Mon Dec 11 1995 17:46 | 7 |
| Not everyone takes minutes like I do. The last set I did contained
the sentence "A lively discussion ensued." In truth, it was just short of a
fist fight. ;-)
--Doug
|