| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 938.1 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150kts is TOO slow! | Wed Jun 14 1995 08:57 | 8 |
| Wow! Mr. Cestra sure is a breath of fresh air!!!!!!! To the BoD and the
search committee in particular, congratulations on a job well done!!!!!
Now, why would a BoD member abstain from approving previous minutes??? I
understand why Mr. McEachin did when he didn't have the minutes to review prior
to the vote.
Bob
|
| 938.2 | re:-.1 Because she was not there | POWDML::OLSALT::DARROW | O2B on the WATER! | Wed Jun 14 1995 12:39 | 2 |
| As I read the minutes, Ms Mann requested that it be noted that she had been
absent since the meeting was held on the firts day of Passover.
|
| 938.3 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150kts is TOO slow! | Wed Jun 14 1995 14:34 | 13 |
| re: .2
Yes, I saw that too. I was thinking more of this one:
>The Board reviewed the April 3, 1995 Telephone Vote Minutes. It was noted
>that these minutes should be considered EXECUTIVE SESSION.
>
>* It was moved by Ms. Mann and seconded by Mr. Gillett to approve the
>minutes as amended (4 in favor; 3 abstentions: Ms. Dawkins, Mr. Mc Eachin,
>and Mr. Gransewicz). Motion carried.
Bob
|
| 938.4 | | WAYLAY::GORDON | Quartz Spider | Wed Jun 14 1995 15:11 | 4 |
| It's possible that the discussion (declared to be executive session)
involved them.
--Doug
|