| Title: | DCU |
| Notice: | 1996 BoD Election results in 1004 |
| Moderator: | CPEEDY::BRADLEY |
| Created: | Sat Feb 07 1987 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 1041 |
| Total number of notes: | 18759 |
From: SMAUG::SMAUG::GARROD "IBM Interconnect Engineering 02-Jun-1995 1331 -0400" 2-JUN-1995 13:39:15.70 To: ROWLET::AINSLEY,WLDBIL::KILGORE CC: GARROD Subj: DCU notesfile needs a new home Bill, Bob, The SMAUG cluster is shortly going to be dismantled. It will reincarnate itself but on a system owned by EDS. Even though SMAUG will continue to be on the EASYNET I don't think it is appropriate to host the DCU notesfile on a non Digital owned machine. Please could you find a new home for the DCU notesfile. It is about 50,000 blocks long at present. If you can't host it on one of your machines I suggest investigating node NOTED::. It has loads of notesfiles on it. I have file access to the DCU notesfile so I can arrange to make it available for copying. I estimate that the SMAUG name will move over to the EDS system in about 2 weeks so I'd appreciate it if you could find a new home for DCU.NOTE. I'm also going to post this in the DCU notesfile. Regards, Dave Garrod, wearing my EDS IBM Interconnect Engineering Manager hat, not my DCU Director hat.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 935.1 | New surroundings | QUATLU::GARROD | IBM Interconnect Engineering | Fri Jun 02 1995 20:49 | 3 |
As you can see this notesfile now has a new home.
Dave
| |||||
| 935.2 | hello? | NPSS::NPSS::BADGER | Can DO! | Fri Jun 02 1995 21:31 | 3 |
now that Dave has been arround here a while, perhaps he will also find
time to respond to some of the topics at hand.
| |||||
| 935.3 | CSC32::BROOK | Mon Jun 05 1995 13:21 | 11 | ||
Ed,
As a contractor, one's use of Digital's network has to be done with
extreme care. So, it is probably better that he still respond through
others, because now, if he wrote something in here directly that
someone took aversion to, then not only would he be in jeopardy ...
but so would his job with his employer. Since if Digital were to
deny him access, he would be useless to his employer.
Stuart (in a similar position)
| |||||