[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::dcu

Title:DCU
Notice:1996 BoD Election results in 1004
Moderator:CPEEDY::BRADLEY
Created:Sat Feb 07 1987
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1041
Total number of notes:18759

921.0. "Suggestion for handling discussion of minutes" by FBEDEV::KYZIVAT (Paul Kyzivat) Fri Mar 17 1995 08:31

    I would like to make a suggestion about the way the meeting minutes are
    handled in this conference:

    Currently the minutes are all posted as replies to a single note, while
    a new note is opened for discussion about each set of minutes.  This
    seems to be a good system.  However, it seems that the new note for
    discussion of a particular set of minutes is usually created *before*
    the minutes themselves are posted.

    If you read this conference using NEXT UNSEEN as I do, the effect of
    this is that be default you see all the discussion about the minutes
    before seeing the minutes themselves.  While it is possible to
    circumvent this by jumping directly to the minutes, it would be more
    straightforward if the minutes were posted *before* the note for
    discussion of them is created.

	Paul
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
921.1WLDBIL::KILGOREMissed Woodstock -- *twice*!Fri Mar 17 1995 09:0220
    
    (This moderator has in mind a widely circulated and personal favorite
    QAR answer, which in his opinion is perfectly suited to this
    situation. As he recalls, it includes multiple instances of the phrase,
    "See Figure 1." He will post a pointer as time permits. In the
    meanwhile...)
    
    You are correct -- the discussion string is started immediately before
    the minutes are posted. This is done because the note number of the
    discussion string is variable, and in times of high traffic essentially
    unpredictable, while the minutes reply is not afflicted by this
    problem.
    
    Cross references between the minutes reply and the base note for the
    discussion string are thoughtfully provided in both entries. The current
    process minimizes the work required to get these cross references
    correct.
    
    Deal with it.
    
921.2SSDEVO::PARRISRAID-5 vs. RAID-1: n+1 << 2n, in $$$Fri Mar 17 1995 13:004
Bill, how about creating a couple of dozen empty reserved topics at a time for
discussion of future minutes; then you can always know what the number of the
next free discussion topic is, and just change the title on the next free one
after you've posted the minutes, to reflect which minutes note it will discuss.