T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
918.1 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Mon Mar 13 1995 15:37 | 12 |
|
Seems like you were a victim of someone honing in on your frequency
whilst driving through NY or a victim of some sort of dishonest
member of the rental agency who chose to tell someone else that this
auto and number were going to be available for use for the length of
time that said auto was rented and that activation time was uncertain.
What a b*tch of a thing to have to deal with these days! Credit card
fraud!!!
|
918.2 | If you have a cell phone, it doesn't even need a Craddit card | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Tue Mar 14 1995 10:57 | 14 |
| It isn't only credit card fraud in this case, it's a broader problem
with cellular. Consider the recent arrest of Kevin Mitnick and the
fact that he paid no cellular bills while using it to perform his
antics. It was possible for him to point MIC at GTE and GTE at MIC as
the originator of the calls causing the service charges (in this case)
to be lost in the "loop".
I suppose, given appropriate eauipment, and electronic eves dropping
that it is possible that your cellular phone could get billed for all
kinds of calls that you never made, much more easily than taking over
your home phone.
Bill
|
918.3 | MCI | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Tue Mar 14 1995 13:33 | 1 |
| re: .2
|
918.4 | | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Mar 16 1995 12:59 | 9 |
| For a long time, plans to encrypt cellular phone communications were
hung up due to the FBI's demand that the phone companies provide means
for law enforcement agencies to easily tap any conversation. They
can't easily tap an encrypted conversation, so...
I don't know the current state of this controversy, but I do think that
it's insane to transmit voice messages over the air in the clear.
Larry
|
918.5 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Fri Mar 17 1995 19:44 | 18 |
| This type of Cellular Phone fraud has been on the rise, especially
in large metro areas like NY city. Supposedly, the crooks sit by
the road side and with the proper electronic equipment can pick up
the necessary info from your Cell Phone even if it's only turned
on, NOT NECESSARILY IN USE, as you drive by. They then take that
info, clone a phone, sell it for a couple of hundred bucks and the
phone buyer uses it as long as they can before the number is
de-activated.
The other half of this story, which has a DCU impact, is people's
earlier concerns and the 'ol DCU Checking/Debit card. Fraudulent
use of this type of card can effect your checking account, your
ability to pay bills, and your reputation with your creditors as
your mortgage, electric, phone, etc... bill checks start to
bounce all over town.
Charly
|
918.6 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Mar 20 1995 14:09 | 4 |
| I'd be more inclined to think that the car phone didn't "forget" the credit
card info and that the next renter discovered this and placed the calls.
Steve
|
918.7 | Absent minded phone...hhhmmmm | CSLALL::DAVIS_KA | Sshhh...quiet..someone is coming.. | Tue Mar 21 1995 08:51 | 10 |
| RE .6
Not likely, I left on a monday, the calls were initiated that Thursday
while I still had the auto and continued till the day 'AFTER' I had
returned the auto. There were so many debits, (after a closer
inspection ~200) that they were not processed till ~4 weeks later.
Go figure...
/Kelvin
|
918.8 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Tue Mar 21 1995 14:56 | 6 |
|
Did all those EXTRA calls start after you made your call in NY???
;*)
|
918.9 | Extra Call = Extra $$$ | CSLALL::DAVIS_KA | Sshhh...quiet..someone is coming.. | Tue Mar 21 1995 20:51 | 7 |
| ...RE. -1
yes they did.....the auto nor the keys were out of my possesion
the entire trip....?
|
918.10 | Rep from Cell-One on the radio | HOTLNE::CORMIER | | Wed Mar 22 1995 08:19 | 11 |
| I heard a rep from Cellular One describing this type of fraud. She said
it happens in very crowded urban areas, where someone with an
electronic device can scan vehicles with cell phones to pick up the
codes. She said it has to be at a major traffic intersection where
cars are most likely going to be stopped for a few minutes, so they can
unscramble the information they need. Her advice was NOT to use the
phone in these areas, and watch for someone standing on the sidewalk
intently watching for people with phones up to their ears! She said
NYC was one of the worst because of volume of cars and the slow pace of
traffic.
Sarah
|
918.11 | | RANGER::TRYST::Rozett | We're of difn't worlds, mine's EARTH! | Wed Mar 22 1995 09:45 | 10 |
| >> phone in these areas, and watch for someone standing on the sidewalk
>> intently watching for people with phones up to their ears!
The phone does not have to be in use, only turned on. As long as the phone is
powered on, it will transmit the information they need to reprogram stolen
phones.
//bruce
|
918.12 | | ICANDO::BADGER | Can DO! | Wed Mar 22 1995 11:58 | 19 |
| This particular case does not appear to be 'cellular' related. They
appear to be credit card, err debit card related. The interception
could have occured miles away from where the person was driving.
the credit card, if swipped, sent it's code DTMP. anyone with a
modified scanner could have picked it up and with shareware software
decoded the digits.
This incident is one of the examples of hwy I and others had said NO
to the debit card.
If your credit card gets stolen, or the numbers used, your past uses
are protected, and you know about an overlimit immediately.
But, with a mix of checks and credit card use, checks that you may have
made out and mail prior to the unauthorized use of debit card can and
will bounce. and you can continue bouncing until your next statement.
not for me.
ed
|
918.13 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Thu Mar 30 1995 17:54 | 4 |
| Re -1: Thanks for explaining the pitfalls of having a debit card. I never
really considered having one, but this has convinced me. There are lots of
ways people can get your credit card number; the cellular phone is the newest
trick.
|
918.14 | | QUINCE::MADDEN | Icke r�kare. | Fri Mar 31 1995 01:32 | 11 |
| Re: .-1
It's not that the debit card is anathema to checking account security.
It presents a slightly different set of risks than a credit card, but
if you find it to be a useful tool, you can manage its risks easily
enough once you know what they are.
I like to view notes topics like this as educational, not as means to
dissuade people.
--Pat
|