| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 856.1 | New bylaw to allow members from other Co.s - like a, er, Bank | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Mon Aug 01 1994 15:30 | 4 |
| I don't have a clue, but if Quantum were to be interested in allowing them
to remain there, mightn't it make sense for them to do so, as they already
have a member-clientele on site to serve?
|
| 856.2 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Mon Aug 15 1994 19:01 | 7 |
| I agree, I think it would be foolish for DCU to close this office unless
Quantum wants to use the space for its own credit union. I don't think it would
be a lot more difficult to have DCU facilities in a non-Digital plant, because
DCU is not part of Digital either.
Please refresh my memory. Do SHR1 and SHR2 (the future Quantum facilities)
have a DCU office *and* ATM? And I know SHR3 has one or the other; do they
have both?
|
| 856.3 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Mon Aug 15 1994 23:31 | 5 |
| re .2
SHR1 (and SHR2, since the only way to get to SHR2 is through SHR1) has
both an ATM and a DCU office. SHR3 has only an ATM.
Rich
|
| 856.4 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Tue Aug 16 1994 10:03 | 4 |
|
Remember when we, in here, were chatting about the SHR DCU office and
ATM being consolodated? Now we know why!
|
| 856.5 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Tue Aug 16 1994 10:10 | 8 |
| re .4
But that never happened!
There is a ATM just before the guard desk in SHR1, but the office remains in the
center of the building along the main corridor.
Rich
|
| 856.6 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Wed Aug 24 1994 16:40 | 4 |
| There is construction going on in the lobby of SHR3. Unknown if it is for a DCU
office or claiming open area for conference rooms.
Rich
|
| 856.7 | DCU won't move funds from Quantum | LEDS::GRAHAM | | Wed Sep 21 1994 16:01 | 11 |
| Since I'll be moving to Quantum, there's another issue that I'd like
to mention. While I'll be able to deposit my pay to DCU, they won't
be able to automatically move funds to the savings accounts of my
wife & 3 kids. The way I have it now, a precentage goes into each
of the savings accounts but after October 3rd, I'll have to go to a
branch office and tell them to move so much into account X, so much
into account Y etc. Since these are all separate individual accounts,
I can't use EasyTouch. What a pain! Is there any other recourse for
me?
John G.
|
| 856.8 | | HOTLNE::WAXMAN | I live for my dreams | Wed Sep 21 1994 16:18 | 4 |
| What are you getting at? That is standard for any employee who leaves
digital and goes to work for another company....
Bw........
|
| 856.9 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | DCU 3Gs -- fired but not forgotten | Wed Sep 21 1994 16:56 | 8 |
|
I interpreted it as saying: "As a DEC employee I have access to a DCU
feature that I use regularly. As a non-DEC employee, I will no longer
have access to that feature. If DCU is interested in keeping non-DEC
employees as members, perhaps it should look into ways for making this
feature (and others?) available to all members, regardless of their
current employer."
|
| 856.10 | | LEDS::GRAHAM | | Wed Sep 21 1994 17:18 | 13 |
| -1 stated my point exactly. I do business with another finacial
institution that can automatically take funds from one account and use
it to pay/deposit into others. I understand that DCU will be getting
my net pay in another format, but so what? It's all electronic of one
sort or another and from my perspective as a part-time programmer it
doesn't seem like it'd be that much of a problem.
I can't speak for the others here in SHR that are going to Quantum, but
there must be at least several hundred others in the same boat. If so,
I can forsee scores of us queuing up at the branch office or calling
DCU every other Friday just to move some money around various accounts.
John G.
|
| 856.11 | | HOTLNE::WAXMAN | I live for my dreams | Wed Sep 21 1994 17:19 | 7 |
| Which feature? Easy touch? I interpret it as saying " I used to be able
to have my funds transferred to each indvidual account automatically
and now I can't. " People should consider themselves lucky that they
are still able to keep their DCU account when they STOP working at digital.
IMHO.
Bw.............
|
| 856.12 | | STAR::BUDA | I am the NRA | Wed Sep 21 1994 17:30 | 4 |
| I wonder if DCU has looked into trying to become the CU for Quantum, if they
do not already have one. Seems like a logical association to have...
-mark
|
| 856.13 | Only if a CU wants to die... | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Wed Sep 21 1994 18:16 | 10 |
| re: .11
> and now I can't. " People should consider themselves lucky that they
> are still able to keep their DCU account when they STOP working at digital.
> IMHO.
What? I've never heard of anyone being kicked out of a CU because they stopped
being an employee.
Bob
|
| 856.14 | Counterproductive at best, I'd think | VMSSG::LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Thu Sep 22 1994 00:42 | 9 |
| .11 (and .13):
Corporate bodies generally find a lack of growth (much less a
shrinkage) life-threatening. On the other hand, such a policy would
appear to fit well with some others that have effectively reduced
DCU's penetration into what is a well-defined and exceedingly finite
market...
Dick
|
| 856.15 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Thu Sep 22 1994 11:05 | 5 |
| re: 11
Oh please give it a rest, that's a very silly comment.
mike
|
| 856.16 | if not,my account is gone! | SUBSYS::WOJDAK | | Thu Sep 22 1994 12:24 | 3 |
| So will DIGITAl SHR3 employees be allowed into Quantum to access the DCU?
Rich
|
| 856.17 | DCU at Quantum | SCORN::STEVENS | | Wed Oct 05 1994 12:30 | 3 |
| In SHR, SHR-1 and SHR-2 were sold to Quantum. DCU has maintained its office in
SHR-1 which is now owned by Quantum.
|
| 856.18 | | SCORN::STEVENS | | Wed Oct 05 1994 13:24 | 4 |
| re:.16
I hear that SHR3 employes do have access to DCU but have to be escorted since
they are now not in a Digital facility.
|
| 856.19 | There are a few of us still here | MAGEE::GIBSON | | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:55 | 12 |
| Re: .18
That is correct. Those of us Deccies who are still in (the former) SHR1
must log in and out like contractors, and have special tape (which
says "evidence", but I'm not paranoid) on our badges to indicate that
we can be in the building without an escort.
The tellers don't know how long they will be here or where they will
be going, according to a recent inquiry by a coworker.
Linda
|
| 856.20 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | How about those DCU 3Gs!! | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:47 | 11 |
|
.19> The tellers don't know how long they will be here or where they will
.19> be going, according to a recent inquiry by a coworker.
One could ask a communicative Director� about the status of the SHR
branch.
�There are so many more of them these days :-)
|
| 856.21 | DCU access at SHR1 is unacceptable! | SUBSYS::WOJDAK | | Wed Oct 12 1994 09:58 | 19 |
| I used the DCU at SHR1 the other day and it is a ROYAL pain for
DIGITAL employees.You have to first sign-in at Quantum and are given a
visitor badge.Then the security guard must call the DCU and ask for an
escort.I waited approx.5 minutes while the guard made repeated attempts to
call the DCU,but the phone was busy (the guards made the remark that this
had already happened a few times already.).At this point (about 4:20 and
DCU closing time) I convinced the guard to let me walk to the DCU
unescorted.The access to the DCU is a major inconvience and unacceptable
to me.
I called the DCU today and they have no plans to move a DCU to
SHR3.If they could locate the office in the lobby,it would make it
accessable without escorts and guard involvement.I stuck with the
DCU through some tough times and now that the 3Gs are elected I would
like to stay with the DCU,but easy access to a DCU office is a main
concern of mine and without it, I will reconsider staying with the DCU.
Rich
|