[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::dcu

Title:DCU
Notice:1996 BoD Election results in 1004
Moderator:CPEEDY::BRADLEY
Created:Sat Feb 07 1987
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1041
Total number of notes:18759

780.0. "Segmentation Analysis" by ASE003::GRANSEWICZ (Candidate for DCU Director) Mon Mar 14 1994 00:55

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
780.1ASE003::GRANSEWICZCandidate for DCU DirectorMon Mar 14 1994 01:1319
    
    RE: .0
    
    This information was presented during our 1993 Planning Conference last
    October.  It was being presented by DCU's V.P. of Marketing (since
    left) when one of the Directors commented, "This looks like a formula
    for going out of business.".  I stated, "But this is EXACTLY what
    relationship banking is intended to do."  (I didn't mean it was intended
    to make us go out of business, but that it was intended to reduce the
    number of "non-relationship members".  They would theoretically become
    "relationship members")  The V.P of Marketing agreed with my statement.
    
    It was one of my most incredulous moments as a Director.  A financial
    person with many years of experience, who had voted for "relationship
    banking", would only NOW understand the effect it was intended to have.
    
    It might be time to re-run this analysis and see just how "relationship
    banking" has done.
    
780.2PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Mar 14 1994 13:586
�    It might be time to re-run this analysis and see just how "relationship
�    banking" has done.
    
    I was going to ask this question today.  It will be interesting to see
    what impact relationship banking and the cleanup has had on these
    numbers.