T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
600.1 | | COOKIE::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Thu Sep 03 1992 00:39 | 12 |
| How about NOT sending statements in most months with no activity? Use
the following algorithm for determining which months to send a
statement:
1. Always send a statement at the beginning of January, April, July,
and October. Those are the statements when interest (if any) shows.
2. Send a statement in other months ONLY if the account showed
activity.
Additionally, the January statement for everybody could double as the
IRS 1099(?). That would save one mailing every year.
|
600.2 | Consolidate mailing of family accounts | PAVONE::NOLAN | Chris | Thu Sep 03 1992 08:13 | 16 |
| How about consolidating mailings within a family?
For tax reasons initially I opened separate accounts for each of the 4
members of my family (including myself). Each of these accounts has an
account number which is clearly related to my badge number, which is my
account number.
It should be trivial to send all of the statements for this group of
accounts in one envelope instead of the four that I now receive.
Incidently the suggestion about not mailing statements for non-active
accounts is already done. I only receive statements for the family
members accounts once each quarter, since they're generally not active.
But when I do get them they are all in separate envelopes!
chris.
|
600.3 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Thu Sep 03 1992 08:19 | 11 |
| There are a couple of problems with consolidating mailings. Primary
is that not all member need to be living together. My mother in law
has an account but she only lives at my house 4-5 months a year. I'd
have to remail statements. Next is that members can still be members
after a divorce, seperation, or as kids move out of the house. Privacy
then becomes a big concern.
Reducing mailings to inactive accounts seems to be pretty low risk
though.
Alfred
|
600.4 | SMOP | NAC::KINDEL | Bill Kindel @ LKG2 | Thu Sep 03 1992 11:15 | 20 |
| Re .3:
> There are a couple of problems with consolidating mailings. Primary
> is that not all member need to be living together. My mother in law
> has an account but she only lives at my house 4-5 months a year. I'd
> have to remail statements. Next is that members can still be members
> after a divorce, seperation, or as kids move out of the house. Privacy
> then becomes a big concern.
You point is well-taken, but I think there's a workable solution.
First off, it only makes sense to consolidate statements that are sent
to the same address. That takes care of your mother-in-law, who should
have her statements sent to her "permanent" address.
As for privacy, it wouldn't be all THAT hard for the DCU to announce
that they plan to consolidate mailings in this way and to give members
the ability of opting for separate mailings. (There is programming
involved in doing consolidated mailings anyway, so adding an account
flag or extending the street address to force uniqueness should be no
large incremental burden.)
|
600.5 | | TUXEDO::YANKES | | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:29 | 20 |
|
Re: .all of the above
For the "low activity" accounts, how about instead of just saying
"no activity this month = no statement", allow the members to _also_
ask for just a quarterly statement to override the rules? Its very
rare that I have a month with absolutely no activity, but yet I still
could do without the monthly statement. (Especially since nearly all
of my transactions are done at teller stations where I get the new
balance right away.)
And as for sending one envelope per household -- this is a good
idea. Its bad enough that I've received around 140 check
reconciliation forms since joining Digital and never used a single one,
but both my wife and I get one each month, we both get the inserts, etc.
I'd love to be able to ask for a merged statement and a single
envelope. (While we're totally redesigning the statement distribution,
can I also ask to not get any more of those reconciliation forms? :-)
-craig
|
600.6 | .5 is not alone | A1VAX::BARTH | Shun the frumious Bandersnatch | Fri Sep 04 1992 09:21 | 5 |
| RE: .5
Me too. All of .5 is exactly the same for me.
K.
|
600.7 | | KYOA::KOCH | It never hurts to ask... | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:38 | 10 |
| re: .5
I agree about requesting the statement, however, they always have the
option of using EasyTouch to find out what their balance is. I would
like to see an analysis posted of how many accounts have no activity
other than interest being posted. Also, we need to do an analysis of
how much is ACTUALLY costs to send out statements vs. how much revenue
we realize from lending the money which is the account. Again, if we
can cut costs, we realize more interest paid and this might entice
people to invest money in DCU which is paying higher returns.
|
600.8 | | ERLANG::HERBISON | B.J. | Fri Sep 04 1992 17:43 | 9 |
| Re: .5
> but both my wife and I get one each month, we both get the inserts, etc.
> I'd love to be able to ask for a merged statement and a single
> envelope.
It sounds like you want one account, not two.
B.J.
|
600.9 | | TUXEDO::YANKES | | Tue Sep 08 1992 11:34 | 10 |
|
Re: .8
No, I don't want one account, I want the two that we've
historically had. (Both my wife and I had separate DCU accounts before
we even met.) The multiple checking and savings accounts have
specific short- or long-term usages that I don't want to see
intermingled.
-craig
|
600.10 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 08 1992 16:33 | 4 |
| � Additionally, the January statement for everybody could double as the
� IRS 1099(?). That would save one mailing every year.
I thought it already did.
|
600.11 | STATEMENT FOR A CLOSED ACCOUNT | RGB::MENNE | | Tue Sep 08 1992 17:58 | 7 |
| I closed an account and I still get a statement for a balance of 5
cents ! This has been going on for some time. Apparently 5 cents
of interest crept into the account after I closed it and it never
got closed.
Mike
|
600.12 | | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Sep 08 1992 22:27 | 18 |
| At a bank I once used, a low balance fee crept in when I closed the
account, leaving me with a negative balance! The bank told me to just
forget about it, but I said no way, I wanted them to fix it so their
computers didn't think I owed them anything.
Enjoy,
Larry
PS -- As much as I'd like to get all four statements (me, my wife, and
two kids) in one envelope, it may be very costly to make such a change.
I speculate that it might be costly since it seems to be a fundamental
assumption in the DCU systems (and at all other banks/etc I've used)
that accounts with different numbers are entirely unrelated. Changing
a fundamental assumption in a software system carries risk of introducing
bugs -- imagine the nightmare of lots of statements being mailed to the
wrong addresses while the new system is debugged! Still, it's a nice idea,
and I hope that it can someday be implemented. But if it's hard to do, I'd
rather that DCU management kept its attention on other things right now.
|
600.13 | What are the facts about costs? | CADSYS::FRAZIER | | Wed Sep 09 1992 11:57 | 32 |
| It may be that the good will of members who are not charged any fees (no
matter what their loan/account status is) is worth what it costs DCU to
service their accounts. After all, satisfied members are more likely to
up their account balances, take out loans, open IRAs, etc. than are members
upset over being charged fees.
For example, Eddie Bauer's unlimited return policy operates on this principle --
lose money on the individual transaction (by accepting a return no matter
when or where purchased, with or without receipt) but retain a satisfied
customer who will buy again. In the short term, the store loses. But in the
long term, the store gains.
However, I can't form an opinion about DCU's situation because, once again,
I don't know any of the facts:
o How many of these accounts are there? What percentage of DCU accounts?
o For how long has the average account been unprofitable? Does the number
of unprofitable accounts vary seasonally (More after Christmas and
in late summer?) or does an account, once unprofitable, tend to remain
that way forever ($5 left forgotten in an account?)
o How much does DCU believe it costs overall to maintain these accounts? (And how
does this compare to DCU's loan losses?)
o How much per account?
o How is this figure arrived at? (How much for mailing, for producing
statements, for sending flyers, for data storage, etc?)
Once I have some information about the costs, then I can decide whether or not
DCU can afford to pay this price for satisfied members.
|
600.14 | Please tell how us you are controlling costs... | KYOA::KOCH | It never hurts to ask... | Sat Feb 20 1993 12:12 | 19 |
| This has been in-active for a while. What has been done to investigate
controlling costs for inactive accounts?
I am sure that there must be a way to do this. Even if we are forced to
mail a statement, we don't need to mail a statement. We simply need to
send a postcard saying:
There was no activity on your account for the month of Feb 1993.
If you wish to inquire as to your balance, please use the DCU
Easytouch system or call customer service at 1-800-DCU-TRYS to
speak to a customer service representative.
A postcard only costs $.19 to mail and there is minimal paper, no
envelope, etc.
This savings would mean extra income to those accounts (if they meet
minimum balance requirements) an extra income to all those who active
accounts.
|