T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
346.1 | offer made, awaiting response | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | Someday, DCU will be a credit union. | Thu Oct 31 1991 08:56 | 26 |
| From: GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ "Phil DTN 264-1680 TTB1-2/B1 pole 2A3" 31-OCT-1991 08:54:26.13
To: @BOD
CC: GRANSEWICZ
Subj: Nominating and Supervisory Committees
Board Members,
As a DCU member who wishes to become more involved with my credit
union, I wish to offer my time and energies to help make DCU a
better credit union for all members. It has been mentioned that
DCU members are being selected for the Nominating Committee and
the Supervisory Committee. I wish to volunteer my services for
either of these committees, while expressing a primary interest in
the Supervisory Committee.
I eagerly await your response to my offer. I stand ready to
work vigorously for the betterment of our credit union.
Sincerely,
Philip J. Gransewicz
DCU member
|
346.2 | Are letters of support in order? | NECVAX::HUTCHINSON | | Thu Oct 31 1991 09:52 | 17 |
| Would it be in order for members of DECU to send unsolicited
endorsements of those interested in serving on these two committees
to the BOD? Seems to me that there are a number of participants in
this conference who would make strong contributions to our credit
union, and many others of us who'd like to encourage the BoD to
open up to the themes & ideas expressed by them here. If we know
who are willing to serve, we might have the opportunity to support
their candidacies.
It is great to see Phil Gransewicz prepared to put himself on the line.
I support the vision for DECU he has expressed here, and believe
his tenacity and clear thinking would be an asset to our credit
union.
Jack Hutchinson
|
346.3 | | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | Someday, DCU will be a credit union. | Wed Nov 06 1991 16:42 | 20 |
|
Just got a response back from Mark Steinkrauss.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you.
I'll keep your wishes in mind.
Regards,
Mark
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey, it's a start! He did respond.
Anybody else volunteer?????
|
346.4 | I received a reply | STAR::BUDA | Lighting fuses as I go | Wed Nov 06 1991 18:02 | 9 |
| I also received a reply.
I am sincerely willing to help out on either committee. I still do not
know what Mark is looking for in regards to qualifications, but have asked
and am sure he will let me know.
This is a start.
- mark
|
346.5 | composition of the nominating committee | POBOX::KAPLOW | Free the DCU 88,000 11/12/91! | Thu Nov 07 1991 18:39 | 46 |
| [from DCU Election Guidelines, Section I. B. composition of the
nominating committee]
"It is recommended that three members make up the nominating
committee and none to be a potential candidate for election for
the year in question.
A nominating committee member should be highly motivated. Because
the committee is small each member should be willing to attend
every meeting and to become actively involved in the selection and
coordination process.
No SERVING board member should be appointed to the nominating
committee. The liason may be useful to the nominating committee,
but the views of a single oard member are too easilly interpreted
as the views of the entire board. The nominating committee should
meet with board members (not just one or two) as part of its
operational plan. Further, the nominating committee should be
aware that they have access to any board member (or any other
resource, for that matter) during any part of the nominating
process.
The ideal nominating committee member should know a large number
of DCU members. The more people the committee collectively knows,
the more likely its slate will be outstanding.
Nominating committee members should be:
- impartial
- fair
- have awareness of how DCU functions
- intelligent
- have a "reasonable amount" of Digital seniority
- good judgement (especially of people).
The makeup of the whole committee is important. The committee
should be broadly based -- so that the committee be as
representative of the population as possible. GEOGRAPHICAL
REPRESENTATION IS THE LEAST SIGNIFICANT CRITERION. WHAT IS MORE
IMPORTANT IS A BLENDING OF DISCIPLINES, LEVELS, AND POINT OF
VIEW."
|