Title: | DCU |
Notice: | 1996 BoD Election results in 1004 |
Moderator: | CPEEDY::BRADLEY |
Created: | Sat Feb 07 1987 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1041 |
Total number of notes: | 18759 |
** Official note to notify BoD of member Strategies and Tactics ** *** Note: This will better facilitate BoD's countermeasures and dis-information efforts *** *** Note: This note is not entirely serious *** I probably should just kill this and not post it. I really don't want to offend anyone or belittle their concerns... But at the least (well, maybe not "the least"), I should probably state at the outset that I have a rather warped sense of humor. Oh well, that said, I'm personally finding this sickly amusing. Lets see now, in this conference: Did Happen (:^(<): -- Someone suggests Livewire; Livewire access disappears -- Someone suggests finding the room size; the information becomes restricted -- People are convinced that "held" means one thing; BoD decides otherwise Could Happen (%^)>): -- Someone suggests tiny tape recorders; security can check with metal detectors (security will be there in force - they wouldn't want a riot would they?) - they can also perform strip searches of individuals on the "black-list". -- Someone suggests getting there early; now what if the signs don't go up or doors don't open until 7:15? What if they "accidently" post the wrong room? Or the wrong hotel? -- Someone could suggest a "sit-in" with folk music and love beads; the BoD shows up wearing flak vests, gas masks, and MACE clipped to their belts; they can't hear the "yay" votes and the vote fails. If the magical mystical "BoD" wanted to do nothing more than yank the collective chains of those reading this file, they would be doing nothing differently. I'm sure they are having quite a laugh at this (in their own Dan_Quale/Pee_Wee_Herman kind of way). Lets face it, the "BoD" does hold the cards here. They pay the lawyers, they pay the hotel, and they pay the rent-a-cops. They also hire ex-members of the NCUA and contribute to the NCUA future employee pool; but I digress. Ultimately though, no matter what happens, there will always be enough happy-go-lucky members to keep the DCU afloat and pay the staffing fees. And I personally believe they know this. Now what can we do? I propose we establish fortwith a secret and absolutely confidential plan. This plan should call for everyone to form their own credit union. This will insure that each person has their money in a credit union which has a BoD more agreeable to the membership. Of course, the BoD's will always know what their members are up to, but this can be overcome by a Notesfile dedicated to each Credit Union. Additionally, you won't have to worry about your funds being invested anywhere you don't feel comfortable, and they can even be insured by a federally recognized individual's insurance fund. For example, Greg's Credit Union will be insured by the GCUA (Greg's Credit Union Association); the IRS personally recognizes Greg every year by sending him a stack of forms. (Note, the GCU is an Equal Opportunity Employer) So lets post all strategies here. Really, the BoD would never do anything with this information. Really, they wouldn't. I'm not making this up. /greg PS - The GCU is not affiliated with, or in any connected to, the opinions stated here. Any similarities or likenesses to individuals or organizations, living or decaying, are entirely coincidental. Your mileage and interest rates may vary. GCU (uR) is a non-registered trademark of Greg
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
329.1 | GCU: an idea that almost works | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Sun Oct 20 1991 13:55 | 30 |
I was going to decry your idea as hopelessly impractical, on the grounds that it will be hard to manage to cash flow at GCU -- if Greg decides to give himself a mortgage on Cape Code commercial real estate, that will most likely exceed the funds available in the GCU for investment. Then I realized that ordinary credit unions solved this problem long ago. GCU can keep 10% to 25% of the "investments", and allow one or more other credit unions to "participate" by putting up the bulk of the money. The really neat part about this scheme is that, according to the DCU BoD, it is standard practice to *not* check any of the statements that GCU makes about the loans! Of course, if GCU were to make any false statements on the loan forms, that could cause trouble -- but only if some GCU loans go into default. Until then, the GCU is in no danger of discovery. And even then, it appears that civil lawsuits may be the worst that the GCU has to face -- and even that step could take a long time after the loans first start going bad, depending on... well never mind. Come to think of it, the whole scenario is too riddiculous to possibly happen. I mean, the NCUA wouldn't allow it, and if the members of the participating credit union found out, they'd be pretty upset, wouldn't they? And the big disadvantage of a personal credit union like the GCU is that the member really is an owner, and therefore knows what's going on. So while all this makes an interesting story, I have trouble believing that it could happen in real life. Enjoy, Larry :-) | |||||
329.2 | Charter Member | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | Someday, DCU will be a credit union. | Mon Oct 21 1991 08:59 | 6 |
RE: Greg's Credit Union I want to join. One of my CD's with DCU expires today and it goes elsewhere, for now. The sorry fact is that I trust a complete stranger more than I trust the DCU BoD. |