T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
303.1 | Ours had the check numbers. | STAR::PARKE | I'm a surgeon, NOT Jack the Ripper | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:11 | 0 |
303.2 | Our 2 statements had check numbers. | HDLITE::HORTON | Ken Horton, KA1GFN | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:40 | 2 |
| Both my wife and I have Share Draft accounts and there was not change in the
statement that we received.
|
303.3 | | NEST::JOYCE | | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:45 | 5 |
| I talked with someone here who had a similar problem with .0. It
appears that opting for one of the new checking account choices
caused this. But I can't remember which one it was.
|
303.4 | Is this a joke or what?! | LAVC::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Tue Oct 08 1991 10:36 | 8 |
| re: opting for one of the new checking account "choices" results in less
information on your statement.
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!
For some reason, I'm not surprised. Welcome to the new DCU.
:-(
|
303.5 | Check numbers are back. | NODEX::FU | Jack Fu, LMO2-1/N11, 296-5127 | Wed Oct 09 1991 20:06 | 4 |
| re: .0
A few days later I received a duplicate statement that did have the
share draft numbers.
|
303.6 | case closed, mistake remedied | GLDOA::REITER | | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:57 | 6 |
| re: .0, .5
Thank you for keeping us posted on the resolution of your problem.
That is a rare occurrence in this file.
\Gary
|