T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
291.1 | A meeting may not happen | SLOAN::HOM | | Wed Sep 25 1991 20:55 | 27 |
| I have tried to be objective through out this period. I will, however,
be very disappointed if the meeting does not take place by 10/17.
I can imagine scenarios whereby the DCU can avoid having the meeting:
1. DCU discusses the situation with the National Credit group.
They indicate they have a new president, etc and would like to
avoid calling the special meeting within the 30 days
requirements. I suspect with approval there's some over-riding
mechanism that would permit this. Most laws, etc have a
loophole somewhere. I would be surprised if the DCU has to have
a meeting by 10/17. Again, there's an out somewhere. No one has
discovered it yet.
2. Though consultation with the NCUA Legal consel in Washington,
the interpretation is redefined. Special emphasis is placed on this request
because the new President of the DCU has had a past affliation with the
NCUA.
There is an out for the DCU. No one has figured it out yet. If the DCU
finds this legal out, it may not meet the spirit of the bylaws, but it
certainly would not be illegal.
Gim
|
291.2 | an idea ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 | Wed Sep 25 1991 22:05 | 10 |
|
If I don't hear about a meeting on 10/17 by 10/10, I suggest we do it
again! Let people know that the DCU BoD will have ignored their call
for a special meeting and that their only recourse is to call AGAIN for
a special meeting. BUT, this time, when the thousands of signatures
are dropped off (again) send a little parcel to the NCUA. This parcel
will contain formal letters of complaint gathered at the same time that
the signatures for the second petition are gathered.
Steve
|
291.3 | Maybe we could transition DCU??? | SSDEVO::RMCLEAN | | Wed Sep 25 1991 23:27 | 2 |
| Gee. I wonder if we could petition Ken to remove DCU from Digital
property??? Wonder if they have a lease?
|
291.4 | One day at a time | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | Someday, DCU will be a credit union. | Thu Sep 26 1991 08:55 | 14 |
|
People, let's get all the way through THIS petition cycle before
planning on the next.
The special meeting WILL happen. DCU has acknowledged receipt and
verification of the correct number of petitions to call a special
meeting (verbally). Though I have requested WRITTEN receipt of the
petitions and WRITTEN acknowledgement of verification, DCU has given
NOTHING in writing.
Should they decide to ignore there responsibilities in calling the
special meeting, we can get the NCUA involved. I have been told that
they DO have the power to remove the entire Board of Directors if the
situation warrants.
|
291.5 | Petitions? We don't have no stinking petitions! | AOSG::GILLETT | And you may ask yourself, 'How do I work this?' | Thu Sep 26 1991 11:58 | 14 |
| > The special meeting WILL happen. DCU has acknowledged receipt and
> verification of the correct number of petitions to call a special
> meeting (verbally). Though I have requested WRITTEN receipt of the
> petitions and WRITTEN acknowledgement of verification, DCU has given
> NOTHING in writing.
Waitasecondhere....you mean that they never gave you a receipt for the
petitions, or gave you any kind of written acknowledgement that they
had been received?
"Gee Phil, I'm not sure what you're talking about. We don't know
anything about any petitions. What ever are you talking about?"
Don't laugh....stranger things have happened. :-(
|
291.6 | Strenth in Numbers | BOOTKY::MARCUS | Good Planets Are Hard To Find | Thu Sep 26 1991 13:43 | 8 |
|
Can those of us that are "geograhpically challenged" fill out an
officail proxy for someone who will be there?
The DCU might be very interested to know that the xxx people there
represent xxxx members.
Barb
|
291.7 | Special Meeting Should Have Proxies | WNPV01::GROSJEAN | Cheerfulness Makes You Healthy | Thu Sep 26 1991 13:59 | 5 |
| Good question. If we can assign our proxies to the BOD, can we
assign them to an individual member?
Gwen
|
291.8 | | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | Someday, DCU will be a credit union. | Thu Sep 26 1991 14:21 | 24 |
|
RE: .5
We do have a sufficient number of eyewitnesses to testify in court
should it be necessary. They are not required by anything to do
anything but accept them. No sweat though. Our copies are in a safe
place. Many things about this special meeting are undefined. It is
entirely up to the whims of the Executive Officer (Mark Steinkrauss).
At this point, I guess he would be the one to send mail to regarding
these matters.
RE: .6 & .7
If proxies were allowed, I think the BoD could be voted out in a flash
judging from the sentiment expressed by DCU members during the petition
drive. I had thought of trying to put together something along the
lines of what you're suggesting but I'm not sure what it could be used
for. It certainly would send a very clear message to the BoD, but they
aren't doing much listening lately from what I can see. Looks like the
people back here are going to have to find the time to attend the
special meeting at make things happen. If they don't, then it will
take 3 years to turn the BoD over completely. I'm not so sure there
will be much left of DCU in 3 years. People's memories fade. I
believe that is what the BoD is counting on.
|