[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::dcu

Title:DCU
Notice:1996 BoD Election results in 1004
Moderator:CPEEDY::BRADLEY
Created:Sat Feb 07 1987
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1041
Total number of notes:18759

278.0. "DCU's Participation Loans - Facts & Questions" by GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ (I'M DCU and you're not.) Thu Sep 05 1991 20:02

    
    [Permission to forward and re-post this note is granted.
     Please be aware of the fact that many of the statements and
     evaluations contained in this reply are my personal opinions and
     evaluations based upon my examination of DCU financial reports and
     conversations with DCU senior management.]


	This is a summary of everything I have been able to find out about
	the DCU participation loans.  Much of this has been stated in
	different topics, but there is some new information.  Hopefully
	pulling it all together will give DCU owners a clearer picture of
	what was going on.

	The participation loans were originated by Barnstable Credit Union.
	They were brought to DCU by Mr. Mangone, DCU President.  Mr. Mangone
	founded the Barnstable Credit Union.  According to the DCU Board
	of Directors, Mr. Mangone was at one time a Director of Barnstable
	Credit Union while he also served as President of DCU.  DCU's Board
	of Directors requested he relinquish his Directorship and he did.
	I am not certain of when this all occurred.  According to the DCU
	Board of Directors, the loans were reviewed and approved by the
	Board of Directors of both Digital Credit Union and Barnstable Credit
	Union.  The loans were not reviewed or approved by the senior
	management of DCU, although they were aware of their existence.

	A total of 16 participation loans were reviewed and approved by the
	DCU Board of Directors from 1985 - 1990.  Four of the loans have been
	paid off.  Twelve loans are now in default.  DCU's participation in
	these loans ranged from 50-90%.  On average, DCU's participation
	was 85%.  The first default occurred in the fall of 1990.

	The total amount of participation loans reached a peak of
	$18,000,000 in 1990.  DCU wrote off $2,696,000 of these loans in
	1990.  The land and property that secured these loans is currently
	being re-evaluated.  As the new evaluations come in, DCU will write
	off against the bad loan allowance if the new evaluation is less
	than the old evaluation.  At the end of 1990, DCU held $6,693,000
	(inflated price) in land and property that secured some of the loans.
	
	I have new information concerning the terms of some of these loans.
	The rates being charged for the loans was prime (Bank of Boston)
	plus 2 percentage points.  One point was also paid at closing.  Of
	the 12 loans now in default, 9 of them were 3 year loans with the
	payment of interest only with a ballon payment at the end of the
	term.  Three of the loans were for a term of 15 years and the
	payments included interest and principal.

	The loan to value ratio of the loans ranged from 57% to 80%.  Another
	way of looking at this is the trust companies borrowing the money
	put up between 20 and 43% on these loans.  Current DCU loans of this
	type to members require the borrower to put up 30%.  In the past,
	DCU has required as little as 20% to be put up by the borrower.
	
	---------------------------------------------------------------------

	Commentary:

	I will quote various sections of the DCU Charter and Bylaws in the
	following commentary.  Please bear with me and read them since they
	are very important.

	Section 5 of the DCU Charter states:

	"The field of membership shall be limited to those having the
	 following common bond:

	Directors and the employees of the Digital Equipment Corporation
	who work in the United States or Puerto Rico, or who are paid from
	Maynard, Massachusetts, except foreign nationals at foreign
	locations,; and, also included are spouses of persons who died
	while in the field of membership of this credit union, employees
	of this credit union, persons retired as pensioners or annuitants
	from the above employment, members of their immediate families*,
	organizations of such persons and Digital Equipment Corporation.

	* any relative related by blood, marriage or adoption to a DEC or
	  DCU employee who is presently a credit union member."

	The above section describes the people who may join DCU and who
	can therefore borrow money from DCU.  No where in the definition of
	the field of membership is there any reference to trust companies.
	The DCU Board of Directors reviewed and approved the loaning of our
	money to real estate trust companies.  They say these were "investments"
	and not loans.  Yet, all of the paperwork and accounting for them
	calls them loans.  They were included in the total amount loaned out
	by DCU.

	Now if we consider them to be "investments", what type of
	"investments" were they?  Were they conservative investments?  In
	no respect can these be called conservative "investments".  Were they
	risky "investments"?  Judging from the higher interest rates being
	paid by the borrowers, the answer would be yes.  Many consider
	this type of borrowing to be even more than risky, they consider it
	to be speculative.  Loans for the purchase of raw land have some of
	the strictest loan requirements.

	Now, does this all match the following statement by the Chairman
	of the Board of Directors at the same time this was all happening?

	'Q. How does DCU invest its money?'

	'A. Because we view DCU as the guardian of members' savings we are
	very conservative in our investment policies.  We reinvest savings in
	member loans.  Additional investments are in government securities and
	federally insured banks.  We deal with the highest quality financial
	institutions and don't invest in any sort of "speculative" instruments.'

	Note: Quotes around the word speculative are in the original letter.
	Source: DCU communication from Chairman of the Board, Mark Steinkrauss,
	    sent in the monthly statement.  The exact date is unknown.  One
	    paragraph reads "In 7 1/2 years we've grown from".  Since formed
	    in 1980, this would date the letter to the mid-1987 time frame.

	Another question is "Did these loans violate the spirit and intent of
	the DCU Bylaws?".  If these same trust companies had come to DCU
	and requested $18 million, they would have been denied the loans
	because they were not and could not be members of DCU.  Yet, the mere
	fact that Barnstable Credit Union originated the loans, somehow made
	them legitimate.  But DCU owned on average 85% of the risk.  DCU was
	the primary lender and risk taker.  Not only did the fact that
	Barnstable C.U. originated the loans seem to make them legitimate
	loans for DCU to get involved with, it also appears to have absolved
	DCU from performing any of the normal evaluation and verification that
	it normally does before loaning money.  So while DCU owned on average
	85% of the risk of these loans ($18 million), none of the evaluation
	and verification that would be done on a $10,000 car loan was
	performed.

	Article 19, Section 4 of the DCU Bylaws state:

	"No director, committe member, officer, agent, or employee of
	this credit union shall in any manner, directly or indirectly,
	participate in the deliberation upon or the determination of any
	question affecting his pecuniary interest or the pecuniary interest
	of any corporation, partnership, or association (other than
	this credit union) in which he is directly or indirectly interested.
	..."

	My question to the Board of Directors is "Did Mr. Mangone participate
  	in the Board of Director meetings where these loans were reviewed and
	approved?"  Since he "brought participation laons to the credit union"
	he should have been considered to have an indirect interest in them
	and been disqualified from the review and approval process.  We will
	need access to the minutes of the Board of Directors meetings to
	determine this.  These minutes are not available for our reading
	according to the DCU Bylaws.

	But, how could all of this have been happening without any member being
	aware of it?  Are we all blind?  Should we have known about it?
	But we were being told over and over that DCU has conservative
	investment and loan policies.  Why should we question what we were
	being told?  But we COULD have been aware of what was going on had
	DCU published it's full annual reports, including auditor's notes,
	from 1985 to 1990.  Prior to 1985, these notes were included in the
	annual reports.  After 1984 the notes were no longer included with
	the financial statements.  These participation loans were very
	evident in the auditor's notes from 1985-1990.

	When I first asked for a copy of the full annual reports, I was
	denied.  The reason given was that they contained confidential
	information.  A day later, I was given permission to go into DCU
	headquarters and read them, but was not allowed to take a copy of
	them.  One note out of 10 or 15 notes could even be considered to be
	anywhere near confidential.  I copied down significant information
	from these notes and have made them public, all with DCU's knowledge.
	I have since requested the Board of Directors to allowed DCU management
	to give printed copies to any member requesting one.  It has been
	one week and there has been no response.  I may just go back and hand
	copy all of them.  How important are they?  A quote from the bottom
	of Page 13 of the 1984 DCU Annual Report states:

	"The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
	 statements."
    
    	'Q. Why was he [Richard Mangone] removed as president?'

	'A. Richard Mangone was removed because he brought participation
    	    loans to the credit union that are not performing.  These
    	    participation loans were with Barnstable Community Federal
    	    Credit Union (BCCU).  Over the past six years, DCU took various
    	    positions, which ranged from fifty to ninety percent, in these
    	    participation loans.'
    
    	'Q. Was Richard Mangone the only individual who reviewed these loans?'
    
    	'A. No.  The participation loans were reviewed in various levels of
    	    detail by two credit union boards, independent auditors and
    	    federal regulators on an ongoing basis since 1985.'
    
    	Source: DCU communication from Chairman of the Board, Mark Steinkrauss,
		dated July, 1, 1991.
    
    	The DCU's Board of Directors have fired Mr. Mangone for his
    	involvement in bringing the nonperforming loans to DCU.  My
    	question to the DCU Board of Director's is "Where is your
    	accountability for reviewing and approving these loans?".  If a DCU
    	loan officer had reviewed and approved loans that resulted in such a
    	loss to DCU, would they be fired?  Who is to hold the Board of
    	Directors accountable for their part in this disaster?  The answer
    	is that the Board of Directors is accountable to its owners, you
    	and I.  They can choose to stay where they are until they either
    	choose to resign, or we, as owners may choose to remove them.
    
	As a DCU member, and OWNER, we must all make a judgement concerning
	this entire mess.  I know I have.

	Phil Gransewicz
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
278.1CLT::OVER::JACKSONCollis Jackson ZKO2-3L06Fri Sep 06 1991 15:171
Good job of research, Phil.
278.2bye!DENVER::DAVISGBCan't come outta the boothFri Sep 06 1991 18:1914
    Thanks again for the research Phil.
    
    I, also, know that I have made my own decision regarding this whole
    mess.  Of course, DCU is so big, and apparently so insensitive, that
    they probably won't notice that they aren't receiving my paycheck
    anymore...
    
    As I've said in previous memos....I'm now using a local credit union
    that has saturday hours, drive up, no fees for checking, and no history
    of loans to non-members.
    
    Like Emmy Lou Harris said...
    
    C'est La vie say the old folks....it goes to show you never can tell!
278.3More info from last "informal discussion"GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZSomeday, DCU will be a credit union.Mon Sep 16 1991 16:3635
    
    A few additional questions were answered at the last BoD "informal"
    discussion:
    
    
    Q. When the first sign of trouble appear with the participation loans?
    
    A. The first default occurred in July or August of 1990.
    
    
    Q. When was the first property repossessed?
    
    A. In the fall of 1990, somewhere around October 1990.
    
    
    Q. What actions did the BoD take after the first default?
    
    A. Reviewed the loans month to month.  Increased reserves.  Had Mangone
    and another appraiser look at property.
    
    
    Q. How was Mangone involved in the review and approval process of the
    participation loans?
    
    A. He was present in the meetings when the loans were reviewed and
    approved.
    
    
    
    Other note:
    
    1. "Considerable" expenses are being charged to DCU operating expenses
    for attorney fees, appraisals and "real estate workout artists" (guess
    these are people that are trying to sell the property).
    
278.4Cape Cod Times, June 8, 1991GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZSomeday, DCU will be a credit union.Wed Sep 18 1991 18:45228
    
	[Permission to forward and re-post this note granted.]

	[Reprinted without permission from the Cape Cod Times dated
	 June 8, 1991.]

			"Credit union affair widens"
			"Lawsuit cites Cape loans"

	By Susan Milton
	Staff Writer

	HYANNIS- A Barnstable credit union scandal has spread to the
	Digital Employees Federal Credit Union, which is now suing its former
	president over $18 million in bad real estate loans, primarily on
	Cape Cod.

	The civil suit claims that former president Richard M. Mangone of
	Norwell generated the loans while also an officer and investment
	adviser at the Barnstable Credit Union in Hyannis.

	But it was his employer, the Digital credit union, that bought 75
	to 90 percent of the participation loans and stands to lose more
	than $10 million, plus costs, the suit says.  Participation loans
	are shared by more than one lender.

	The total value of the loans, all in default, amounts to 5 percent
	of the credit union's $371 million in assets. The credit union's
	members are employees of the Digital Equipment Corp., a separate
	corporate entity. Digital is major computer manufacturer based in
	Maynard.

	"Mangone played a central and pivotal role in the origination,
	administration, and management of these loans, which involved
	extensive fraud and other acts of wrongdoing," the suit says.

	With "straws"- stand-in borrowers- fake income tax returns and
	financial statements and grossly inflated real estate appraisals,
	Mangone shepherded loans through the Digital credit union's board
	of directors,the suit states.

	In one case the board never approved the loan, yet $3 million was 
	transferred at Mangone's order to the Barnstable credit union and
	paid to unknown parties, the suit states.

	Mangone is charged with fraud and deceit, gross negligence, breach
	of contract and unlawful use of Digital credit union funds. The
	suit also seeks to attach $157,000 in Mangone's account at the
	credit union.

	The suit also names three "John Does", unidentified people who also
	"participated in and were the recipients of certain fraudulently
	obtained loan proceeds at issue", the suit states.

	The suit claims to describe in detail how credit union insiders
	financed millions of dollars worth of real estate speculation through
	the two credit unions in the late 1980's. 

	Such speculation also was described in March in a Cape Cod Times
	series about how deeds and mortgages for subdivisions and lots moved
	among credit union officials, relatives, business associates,
	secretaries, and subcontractors.  The paper trail concealed inflated
	property values and debt from lenders and regulators. 

	In the Digital suit, the 12 participation loans showed ties to
	James K. Smith and Mangone, both credit union founders and business
	partners, and their former partner Ambrose Devaney. Smith is a
	Barnstable developer.  Devaney is a developer from Rockport.

	For example, the loans bear the names of Charles Ryan, a construction 
	supervisor for Smith; Devaney; John Schulenberg of Barnstable, 
	Smith's brother-in-law, Jeffrey Shaw of Centerville, a masonry
	contractor for Smith; Robert Churchill of Yarmouth, Smith's real
	estate associate, among other unknown real estate trustees.

	Similar transactions led to the Barnstable credit union's takeover
	March 20th by federal regulators for illegal business loans to a
	select group of borrowers.

	Those activities are under investigation by the FBI, the U.S.
	Attorney's office, criminal and civil attorneys for private parties.

	Judging from the detail in Digital's court suit, some of the "straws"
	or trustees who held property for credit union insiders are now
	talking to those investigators.

	Due to his involvement in the Barnstable credit union, Mangone was
	fired April 5th by the Digital credit union.

	A related foreclosure action last November, brought by Berkshire
	County Savings Bank, named real estate trustees Robert Cohen, then
	attorney for the two credit unions; Barnstable town councilor
	Michael O'Niel, also a Hyannis lawyer; John Kenney, O'Niel's law
	associate; Steven Jones, Smith's brother-in-law and Hyannis lawyer;
	and Malden lawyer Richard Murphy, then a Digital Lawyer. 

	The Digital credit union suit was filed May 23 in Brockton Superior
	Court in Plymouth County by Charles B. Janes and Marcy J. Levine,
	of Bingham, Dana, and Gould of Boston.

	Since 1987, Barnstable credit union officials and Mangone have
	repeatedly denied publicly that the Digital credit union was
	participating in such loans.

	"We're not... a participatory lender;... we do not buy loans." said 
	Mangone in early February, speaking as the Digital credit union
	president.

	He also pooh-poohed any questions about the health of the Barnstable 
	credit union's loan portfolio and said, "You're in a long line
	of 20 examinations by professionals a lot sharper than you and I.
	We've never had any problems with any of these values.  Other
	participating banks also got involved and looked at these properties.
	We're just not selling a pig in a poke."

	Digital's suit allegedly describes how Mangone and others, as yet
	unnamed, were able to sell a pig in a poke to the boards of the
	two credit unions, the federal regulators, and private auditors.

	In April 1990, Smith asked Charles Ryan to be trustee of Mazel II
	Realty Trust, the suit states.  Ryan was employed as a construction
	supervisor by Centerville Builders Inc., believed to be owned by
	Smith, according to the suit.

	Smith said he wanted to get a $1.5 million loan to buy Asher's
	Heights, a 67 lot subdivision at Asher's Path and Route 28 in Mashpee.

	Supporting documentation for the loan included an appraisal report
	that put the subdivision's value at $5.2 million, or $78,000 a lot
	as of June 14.  Less than a year later, its current value is about
	$15,000 a lot, the suit states.

	The property's deed lists a price of $1.4 million.  That is $2.71
	million less than the $4.15 million participation loan issued by
	Digital credit union.

	The documents showed his net worth as $8.86 million as of
	December 31, 1989, when in fact, Ryan has never possessed a fraction
	of that.

	Mangone didn't even take that $4.4 million loan to the Digital
	credit union's board.  It was the largest participation loan in
	the credit union's history at a time when the Cape Cod real estate
	market was depressed.

	Instead he instructed a Digital employee to transfer almost
	$3 million, Digital's share, to the Barnstable credit union. At
	least 75 percent was given out in a single transaction to unknown
	parties. 

	Building still hasn't started in the Mashpee subdivision and the
	loan is in default.

	=====================================================================


	"Properties Cited in credit union suit"

	Listed are the property, the total loaned, the real estate trustee,
	the trustee's relationship to Barnstable Community Federal Credit
	Union insiders, mortgage amount and year.  The information is from
	court and registry records.

	Panorama Motor Lodge, Bourne
	High View Realty Trust
	Ambrose, Devaney, Mangone and Smith's partner
	Mortgage: $1.75 million, 1987

	Capewind Motor Lodge, Teaticket
	Perch Pond Realty Trust
	Devaney; Smith claims 1/3 interest
	$2.45 million, 1987

	Winslow Farms
	Mashpee subdivision
	Santuit Woods Realty Trust
	trustee John Schulenberg, Smith's brother-in-law
	$2.95 million, 1987

	Yankee Village
	41-lot Brewster commercial/residential subdivision
	Signal Hill Realty Trust
	trustee John Schulenberg, Smith's brother-in-law
	$1.7 million, 1987
	and
	Yankee Village Realty Trust
	trustee Jeffrey Shaw, masonry contractor for Smith
	$1.25 million, 1989

	Barnstable News Store building, Barnstable
	Barnstable News Store Trust
	trustee Richard Murphy; Smith claims half interest
	$1.65 million, 1990

	Asher's Heights, Mashpee
	67-lot subdivision
	Mazel II Realty Trust
	trustee Charles Ryan, Smith construction supervisor
	$4.14 million, 1990

	unknown property, Plymouth County
	Second Green Island Trust
	trustee John J. Maffei, unknown relation
	$2.15 million, 1987

	Hanover property, Plymouth County
	Curtis Village Realty Trust II
	trustee Robert Churchill, Smith business associate
	$2.4 million, 1988

	unknown property
	Plainfield Development Realty Trust
	trustee unknown
	$1.52 million, 1988

	unknown property
	Walcott Realty Trust
	trustee unknown
	$2.5 million, 1988

	Dartmouth subdivision
	Interstate Realty Trust
	trustee Stephen J. Mullen, Hanover;
	unknown relation
	$3.55 million, 1989

	=====================================================================
    
278.5Very interesting now that we know moreGUFFAW::GRANSEWICZSomeday, DCU will be a credit union.Wed Sep 18 1991 19:2792
>	The civil suit claims that former president Richard M. Mangone of
>	Norwell generated the loans while also an officer and investment
>	adviser at the Barnstable Credit Union in Hyannis.
    
	We have been told several times that Mangone severed his official
    ties to Barnstable when he brought these loans to DCU.  According to
    the BoD, Mangone was present during the review and approval of these
    "investments".  The DCU Bylaws prohibit this in Article 19, Section 4.
    
>	Mangone shepherded loans through the Digital credit union's board
>	of directors,the suit states.

    If DCU Bylaw 19, Section 4 had been enforced, this would not have been
    the case.
    
>	In one case the board never approved the loan, yet $3 million was 
>	transferred at Mangone's order to the Barnstable credit union and
>	paid to unknown parties, the suit states.

    Well, this looks like the answer to my question at the last informal
    discussion.  The DCU lawyer didn't want to answer it even though it is
    a matter of public record.
    
>	The suit claims to describe in detail how credit union insiders
>	financed millions of dollars worth of real estate speculation through
>	the two credit unions in the late 1980's. 

    Hmmm, did DCU actually use "real estate speculation" in their suit? 
    Glad to know we have using the correct terminology.
    
>	Such speculation also was described in March in a Cape Cod Times
>	series about how deeds and mortgages for subdivisions and lots moved
>	among credit union officials, relatives, business associates,
>	secretaries, and subcontractors.  The paper trail concealed inflated
>	property values and debt from lenders and regulators. 
    
    In March??  Wonder if DCU was ever contacted regarding the contents of
    this article?  I hear the Cape is nice this time of year.
    
>	Due to his involvement in the Barnstable credit union, Mangone was
>	fired April 5th by the Digital credit union.
    
    Which involvement was he fired for?  Seems he's had a fairly ongoing
    involvement with them.  But we all know he was fired for bringing the
    non-performing loans to DCU.  Yes, it was all his fault.
    
>	The Digital credit union suit was filed May 23 in Brockton Superior
>	Court in Plymouth County by Charles B. Janes and Marcy J. Levine,
>	of Bingham, Dana, and Gould of Boston.
    
    Hear Plymouth County is a nice place to visit this time of year... ;-)
    
>	Since 1987, Barnstable credit union officials and Mangone have
>	repeatedly denied publicly that the Digital credit union was
>	participating in such loans.

    Can we add the DCU BoD to this list based on their statement sent out
    in 1987?
    
>	"We're not... a participatory lender;... we do not buy loans." said 
>	Mangone in early February, speaking as the Digital credit union
>	president.

    Wonder where and when he said this?  Wonder why he didn't want this to
    be known?
    
>	Digital's suit allegedly describes how Mangone and others, as yet
>	unnamed, were able to sell a pig in a poke to the boards of the
>	two credit unions, the federal regulators, and private auditors.
    
    Gotta love the pig in a poke analogy!  :-)  Heck, if everybody knew 
    DCU wasn't independently verifying documentation on million dollar loans, 
    we'd be waiting in line to recieve our deposits from the agency that 
    insures DCU deposits.  Guess we're lucky we only lost x million.
    
>	The property's deed lists a price of $1.4 million.  That is $2.71
>	million less than the $4.15 million participation loan issued by
>	Digital credit union.

    All it would have taken was for somebody to read the deed and do some
    subtraction to see DCU got taken for $2.71 million?
    
>	Mangone didn't even take that $4.4 million loan to the Digital
>	credit union's board.  It was the largest participation loan in
>	the credit union's history at a time when the Cape Cod real estate
>	market was depressed.

    Depressed is putting it mildly.  The property list shows these loans
    being made into 1990 which is when the first default occurred.
    
    
278.6SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 19 1991 10:323
    Sounds like the DCU BoD wasn't the only ones duped in this whole mess. 
    Mangone successfully eluded federal officials and officials from 2 CUs
    during this time.
278.7GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZSomeday, DCU will be a credit union.Thu Sep 19 1991 15:4352
    RE: .6
    
    >Sounds like the DCU BoD wasn't the only ones duped in this whole mess. 
    
    Maybe not.  But they were the ones "duped" for the most money on these
    loans.  Our money.  Our money that was entrusted to THEM.  Our money
    that they "invested" in real estate speculation or our money that they
    LOANED to non-DCU members.  And what care and diligence did they use in
    caring for our money???  Open up the minutes of the BoD meetings and we
    will ALL know.
    
    If the BoD had realized that they were the Directors of a credit union
    and not a bank then we wouldn't be having this discussion.  Instead
    they chose to act as a bank and make commercial loans.  We need less 
    "dupable" Directors and people that understand why a credit union
    exists in the first place.  Without this philosophy, this will happen
    again somewhere down the road.  We need Directors that don't
    rationalize loans into investments, fees into choices, services into
    blender insurance.
    
 >Mangone successfully eluded federal officials and officials from 2 CUs
    >during this time.
    
    He didn't elude anybody on the other CU because he was intimately
    involved with the other credit union.  He attended WEEKLY meetings at
    Barnstable Credit Union, including BoD meetings there!  He served on
    the BoD of Barnstable until 1987 and acted as an advisor almost up
    until they were closed down.  How could our BoD be oblivious to such
    goings on?  Didn't they ever check ANYTHING?  Believing somebody
    blindly is to relinquish their fiduciary responsibilities to the
    Digital Credit Union IMO.  I want Directors that are also accountable.
    They accpeted all the glory when DCU grew.  Let them step forward and
    accept responsibility when they are involved in the biggest credit
    union scandal in the country.
    
    And it is not the duty of federal agencies and auditors to audit for 
    fraud as a noraml course of business.  What they do check for is that the
    proper controls are in place to prevent it.  In this case, one of those
    VERY IMPORTANT controls was disregarded.  Namely, allowing Mangone to
    participate in the review and approval process of these "investments".
    "Investments" which I would like to remind you, the BoD stated they
    were not involved in.  They gave a list of what they "invest" in.  Cape
    Cod real estate speculation was NOT one of them.
    
    P.S.  You still haven't answered what YOU think these were:
    
    		A.  Investments in real estate trust companies
    		B.  Investments in Cape Cod real estate
    		C.  Loans to real estate trust companies
    
    	Are there any other choices???