T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
256.1 | Learn all we can and act on it | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | I'm from DCU and I'm here to help you | Fri Aug 09 1991 11:55 | 27 |
|
I have called DCU and requested a copy of the DCU Annual Report and a
copy of the Bylaws. Sending the Annual Report was no problem. They
really hemmed and hawwed about the Bylaws though. I guess there are
several manuals. They asked what sections I was interested in. Not
having ever seen them, I couldn't tell them. From our conversation, I
determined that there are 3 binders of NCUA bylaws and 1 DCU specific
bylaws. One of the NCUA binders deals with BoD elections. I will call
back today to determine what they are willing to send me. I will go to
the HQ if necessary to pick it up.
One interesting comment was made by the DCU person on the other end of
the phone. The Bylaws (NCUA or DCU?) are recommendations which they
don't necessarily have to follow. Now then what are the rules we are
playing by here if that is the case? Does that mean we can pretty much
change the bylaws to whatever? Seems the rules they have implemented
concerning BoD elections are definitely self-serving. A write in
candidate is put at a severe disadvantage by these "rules".
We will start to take the credit union back into our hands when we know
the rules of the game and start using them for get normal people
running this place. This latest fiasco will go a long way towards
making it happen. I will be combing the bylaws for any recall
provisions or rules concerning special elections.
We MUST organize now though. Elections will be here before we know it.
|
256.2 | | PORT::NORDLINGER | DTN 521-3398 Western Region | Sat Aug 10 1991 15:55 | 5 |
| I agree, plan for removal of the board, and whatever management is
to be held accountable. Maybe approach other credit Unions for
membership for Digital and scrap the DCU all together.
John
|
256.3 | | DECSIM::GILLETT | And you may ask yourself, 'How do I work this?' | Mon Aug 12 1991 12:25 | 16 |
| re: .0 - allowance for bad debts
Just my guess...
Any business that has receivables on the balance sheet will
eventuall have to "write down" some of the uncollectable debt.
The Allowance for Bad Debt on the balance sheet is reflective of
this type of activity.
This may not be as sinister as you think. Anything they can't
collect they will have to write down. This includes stuff like
uncollectable lines of credit, people who won't pay their
plastic, etc. Of course, it could also include big stuff like
bad loans too.
/Chris
|
256.5 | | DECSIM::GILLETT | And you may ask yourself, 'How do I work this?' | Mon Aug 12 1991 12:39 | 6 |
| Hmmmmm........
Yeah, I think Al's explanation in -1 is a lot more plausible in this
particular situation than is mine.
/chris
|
256.6 | WE DEMAND A DCU REPORT TO MEMBERS. | USCTR2::FSITAR | | Mon Aug 12 1991 12:44 | 26 |
| There are many troubling signs about DCU and here are a few:
1.Members Questins:Phone calls should be answered promptly and
courtiosly with straigt and completly honest answers. Members own
the credit union not the employees or the BOARD.
2.What are the Details of the HUGE ALLOWANCE FOR BAD DEBTS on the
balance sheet?
3.Why is there a reserve fund? All earnings should be returned to
current members that generated them. That is the credit union
principle unless EXPRESSLY authorized by the members to the
contrary.
4.Retained Earnings should be returned to members who have generated
them in dividends at the end of each fiscal year unless members
determine otherwise. That is the credit union principle.
5.I hope the Board members are not being payed and I hope they can
not approve their own loans!!!
6. Members should call for a FULL audit of DCU loan portfolio and
the the findings sent to all members. This request is not a
privilege, it is Members right and DCU can NOT say NO!
Francis.
|
256.7 | | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | I'M DCU and you're not. | Mon Aug 12 1991 12:49 | 25 |
|
Moderator,
Could you please move this to the correct note? Thanks.
Real estate has always been speculative. Has DCU been realistic in
their allowance anyways? $240K allowance for $246,000,000 in loans?
Are we now taking the hit all at once? Will next years allowance be
even higher? (my guess is yes.) IMO, this is the REAL reason for all
these fee increases and "choices" but DCU doesn't want us to know the
extent of the damage. It flies in the face of their proclaimed
investment strategy.
Question DCU: DCU loaned $15,500,000 in 148 business loans in 1990.
Who are these to? Are they DCU members? Are they also risky loans?
Are they secured? Why are we loaning to businesses anymways?
This annual report is a REAL eye-opener! No wonder they don't
distribute it widely.
Phil
P.S.
We also opened our 32 branch in May, 1990 in MAHATTAN to service 1,400
employees. Sure do hope Digital is footing the rent on that baby!
|
256.8 | receivables | USCTR2::FSITAR | | Mon Aug 12 1991 14:01 | 14 |
| The credit union does not make investments and cannot make loans to
non-members. The authority to do the above can only come from the
members and would require a change in the BYE_LAWS to give this
authority to its board.
A credit union with homogenous membership ie a common bond ie DEC
Employees should have few losses. We can bring pressure on fellow
employees to keep the trust. That is what a Mutual selp help Co-Op
like a credit union is all about.
If the bye-laws were not followed we demand reparation and punishment
to protect members money. We need an audit!
Francis.
|
256.9 | | DECSIM::GILLETT | And you may ask yourself, 'How do I work this?' | Mon Aug 12 1991 17:57 | 24 |
| re: .8
My understanding is that DCU is fully able to make loans to
non-DCU members.
Recall the details of the participation loans which resulted in
Mr. Mangone's dismissal. If I'm understanding the situation
correctly, those loans were made to builders and contractors for
Cape-area development.
Further, I believe that the by-laws (not BYE-LAWS...bye-laws are
something that govern leaving your mother-in-law's house :-) )
are merely recommended operating procedures, not hard-and-fast
rules. DCU falls under oversite by a governing board, but
my understanding is that the CU's basically regulate themselves
within some set of broad confines that are legislatively imposed.
If this is true, I can't see how it does any good. Sort of
reminds me of the Big Bad Wolf guarding other Big Bad Wolves.
What I'm *really* curious about is who audited DCU for the annual
report...was it an inside audit, or external. If it was
external, who did it?
/Chris
|
256.10 | Peat, Marwick | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | I'M DCU and you're not. | Tue Aug 13 1991 09:29 | 13 |
|
RE: .9
> What I'm *really* curious about is who audited DCU for the annual
> report...was it an inside audit, or external. If it was
> external, who did it?
Peat, Marwick audits DCU. When I asked Mary Madden why they did not
have a statement in the 1990 Annual Report she said it was because the
report is a condensed version. The auditor will only put their
statement on a full report. I am still awaiting word as to whether we
have access to that full report by the auditor.
|
256.11 | Bylaws are supposed to be inviolable | ULTRA::KINDEL | Bill Kindel @ LTN1 | Tue Aug 13 1991 13:04 | 21 |
| Re .9:
> Further, I believe that the by-laws are merely recommended operating
> procedures, not hard-and-fast rules. DCU falls under oversite by a
> governing board, but my understanding is that the CU's basically
> regulate themselves within some set of broad confines that are
> legislatively imposed.
An organization like the DCU has at least three levels of control, in
addition to applicable state and federal laws and regulations.
1. The CHARTER is granted by a governmental entity and outlines the
general conditions of operation.
2. The BYLAWS serve as the constitution for the organization, spelling
out the responsibilities and fundamental business it is in. They
may be amended, but should NOT be violated. The Board of Directors
is responsible for enforcement of the bylaws on behalf of the
membership (the actual owners).
3. OPERATING PROCEDURES are the responsibility of DCU management.
They should implement the requirements of the charter and bylaws
(and the NCUA and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ...).
|
256.12 | | DECSIM::GILLETT | And you may ask yourself, 'How do I work this?' | Wed Aug 21 1991 12:37 | 17 |
| re: -1
I understand what you're saying out bylaws, but if we're talking
about the articles of incorporation and the bylaws thereto, it's
really easy to do whatever you want.
I once served as a founder and board member for a start-up
corporation. When we did our incorporation, our articles and
bylaws said that we were in business "to pursue legal, for
profit, business transactions as approved by the Board of
Directors." This was essentially a blank check to do whatever we
wanted to do, so long as it was legal and the board said OK.
Language like this is often used to make it harder to pierce the
corporate veil and sue officers directly for making bad business
decisions.
/Chris
|
256.14 | | DECSIM::GILLETT | And you may ask yourself, 'How do I work this?' | Wed Aug 21 1991 14:44 | 9 |
| re: -1
Nope, my incorporation was done in Michigan. But, they're
using legislation modeled after the legislation used in
Deleware. Ever see how many corporations incorporate there?
Where was DCU incorporated? Mass, Deleware, or somewhere else?
/chris
|