T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
238.1 | So, did you call 'em and tell 'em? | PEACHS::MITCHAM | Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta) | Thu Mar 14 1991 11:53 | 0 |
238.2 | | CVG::EDRY | This note's for you | Thu Mar 14 1991 12:21 | 12 |
|
This has been discussed before in the conference.
The general consensus was you couldn't do much to someone's account
without the security code.
Sure, you can get balances, but you don't know who the account belongs
to...
So it's really no big deal!
|
238.3 | What's Easynet got to do with it? | CVMS::DOTEN | when great fat cadillacs roamed the earth... | Fri Mar 15 1991 07:34 | 5 |
| Why does the title of this note have "Easynet" in it - it's got nothing to do
with Easynet... Was "Easytouch" meant? (Isn't that what DCU calls their dialup
service?)
-Glenn-
|
238.4 | still going.... | NPSS::BADGER | Can DO! | Fri Dec 16 1994 11:55 | 9 |
| it appears that this problem/feature was never fixed. I dialed into
someone else's account today =. I immediately called HQ who said it was
no big deal, it happens when someone disconnect wrong.
I say, the system on DCU's should know if someone disconnects wrong and
get out of the account. It may be no big deal, but it doesn't give one
warm and fuzzies with DCU security.
ed
|
238.5 | Murphy's Insurance | NOVA::FISHER | now |a|n|a|l|o|g| | Mon Dec 19 1994 05:22 | 4 |
| aha, now it makes more sense that ET asks for a sec. code to
confirm transfers. 'course I don't think they p;anned it that way. :-)
ed
|