T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
79.1 | GRAND PRIX (large-price?): DCU gives you the run-around | COOKIE::WITHERS | SN*W is a 4-letter word! | Fri Jan 08 1988 13:59 | 11 |
| What the "GRAND PRIX" Flyers say (haven't gotten one in the mail yet)
is that the DCU is giving us the run-around. Notice that services
are the pits. Or maybe, they are trying to tell us that the DCU
gives us mostly GAS?
I commented on this to a teller at the branch here in CXO and the
teller said that it doesn't compare to the run-around that DCU gives
its employees.
BobW
|
79.2 | good idea/bad execution (as usual) | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Fri Jan 08 1988 15:05 | 7 |
| I think the goal here was reasonable - car loans are a money maker for
DCU - they don't make much on the savings and checking, so they need
Car loans, H.E. loans, etc, to help pay the rent...But again, DCU has
messed up in the 'image' department, creating the impression that it
has $$$ to burn. What would I have done? Used to cost of the mailing
to cheapen the cost of the car loans, and advertised them in the
statement mailing.
|
79.4 | | COOKIE::WITHERS | SN*W is a 4-letter word! | Fri Jan 08 1988 16:30 | 7 |
| Hey, in all fairness, we collectively have been berating the DCU
for not being communicative enough with their constiuents. Maybe
we ought to lighten up on them since they *ARE* trying to communicate
(and included in those who should lighten up is yours truly).
BobW
|
79.6 | They just don't get the message... | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Auhhhhh, I've been slimed! | Wed Jan 13 1988 16:12 | 16 |
| I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw that *JUNK MAIL* in my mailbox!
I resent having my minimum balance raised without notice because
DCU had some stricter requirements to meet yet they have enough
money to *WAIST* on this type of garbage.
If DCU wants to increase the volume of car loans then they should
get competitive with the other car loan alternatives. How about
offering a *FIXED* rate car loan at competitive rates! That would
have gotten my business last September. They were 10.5% for a variable
3 year loan. Hell, I got a fixed 4 year loan for 9.75!! I just
can't believe they won't fix a car loan rate.
The only new loans this inspires are from people who haven't done
their homework on available loans!
Phil
|
79.7 | A Joke! | SALEM::RIEU | | Thu Jan 14 1988 08:06 | 3 |
| Plus, they still want 20% down, which you can avoid anywhere
else. DCU is the LAST place I'd get a new car loan.
Denny
|
79.8 | :-) | BAGELS::LEVY | A graph > An infinite # of #'s | Thu Jan 14 1988 12:09 | 14 |
| re: < Note 79.6 by VINO::GRANSEWICZ "Auhhhhh, I've been slimed!" >
> I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw that *JUNK MAIL* in my mailbox!
> I resent having my minimum balance raised without notice because
> DCU had some stricter requirements to meet yet they have enough
> money to *WAIST* on this type of garbage.
DCU is certainly living off the fat of their ignorant customers,
but I'd like to hip you into something: DCU is wasting our dollars,
not waisting it. (Unless the people who profited from the Grand
Prix brochure carry their cash around in money belts. Then it would
be both wasted _and_ waisted.) In any case, I agree: DCU's promotion
budget should be put on a diet.
|
79.10 | Boy, am I read!!! | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Auhhhhh, I've been slimed! | Thu Jan 14 1988 16:30 | 16 |
| RE: .8
Ooops!! I was so pissed at this outrageous WASTE of OUR dollars
that my spelling went down hyll!! ;-)
RE: .9
Re-read my reply please. I stated "at the time" which was last
September. DCU has made no changes that I am aware of to the car
loan terms (fixed vs variable). As for their rates, it would take
10 - 15 seconds (1 call) to find someplace better. And you'd think
that since they're variable, they'd have *better* rates! I couldn't
figure them out. After this latest junk mail campaign, I'm beginning
to get the picture!
Phil
|
79.11 | What percentage do you think are looking for car loans? | GUMMO::SULLIVAN | The roof is shingled!!! | Mon Jan 18 1988 09:08 | 9 |
|
What bothered me was the fact that I got three of them at the same
address. Mine, my wifes (she works at DEC too.), and one for our
common 100 account.
We always get three of everything. Be nice if they had a way to
note duplicates. Although the maintenance/programming would probably
cost more than the duplicates.
|
79.12 | Is a DCU car loan (and this promotion) so bad? | COOKIE::DOUCETTE | Chuck Doucette, Database A/D @CXO | Tue Jan 19 1988 12:54 | 13 |
| I got a car loan from DCU less than a year ago. It was very difficult
to obtain and I haven't had fun dealing with DCU. But, it was a much better
rate than what I was paying and people I talked to said I wouldn't find much
better (although it was variable). It also offerred payroll deductions. I
believe it was 9.00% for 3 years and now it is 9.50%. My previous loan through
the dealer was 12.99% (13%) fixed for 4 years. I saved a couple thousand
dollars. This is my first car loan.
My question is this. Many people are screaming about what a joke DCU
car loans are and that better rates etc. are very easily accessible. Does
anyone have any concrete examples for my next car loan (esp. for Colorado)?
Chuck
|
79.13 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Auhhhhh, I've been slimed! | Wed Jan 20 1988 10:30 | 13 |
| RE: .12
Rates vary from region to region and over time. You just have to
throroughly check out what's available when you need a loan. After
all it *is* a several thousand dollar purchase (interest cost
of the loan)! All I know is that in Sept. of 1987 in Mass., DCU
was not the best. I found a much better deal from *another* credit
union!
I believe many people get DCU loans based on convenience.
Phil
|
79.14 | Official DCU Response | SWATT::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Wed Jan 20 1988 14:11 | 21 |
| This is an official response by John Tilley of the DCU. The portion of
that response, dated 18-January-1988, that applies to this topic note is
included below. See note 2.22 for more information.
Whether you agree or disagree with the response from the DCU,
*PLEASE* remember I'm just the MESSENGER.
Carl Leeber
******************************************************************************
DCU'S PROMOTIONAL EXPENSES: I have passed your compliments to the
artist who helped create the Grand Prix car loan promotion mailing.
The perception of an expensive package and a "Madison Avenue" look
is a tribute to all staff members who worked on the project. To
put the cost in perspective, the ENTIRE promotion will be paid for
by 3 of the new seven year year car loans. DCU is competing against
banks and auto makers with multi-million dollar marketing budgets
for our customer's loan business, looking "low-budget" won't help
us sell loans. Although we are separate companies, DCU does carry
the Digital name and the obligation to maintain the corporation's
image within the marketplace.
******************************************************************************
|
79.15 | Lets try this again. | CRAIG::YANKES | | Thu Jan 21 1988 10:25 | 23 |
|
Re: .14
> To
>put the cost in perspective, the ENTIRE promotion will be paid for
>by 3 of the new seven year year car loans.
I hate to sound like I'm getting too picky, but this answer
is a bit ambigious. Does John mean that the *profit* from three
new loans (i.e. the interest income from the auto loan minus
the interest expense of paying the depositors) or the raw auto loan
interest *alone* paid for the cost of the program?
If its the first, then great, we collectivly got a good deal on the
advertisement and I would owe DCU an incredible amount of praise. If
it is the second, as I suspect, then John gave us a very misleading
return-on-investment answer. It would be like DEC doing a one million
dollar advertisement and saying that a single one million dollar
order would offset the cost -- sort of ignores the costs of designing,
manufacturing and selling the systems... ROI *has* to include the
cost of doing business or it isn't a valid figure.
-craig
|
79.16 | RE: 79.13, A typo detected! | SWATT::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Fri Jan 22 1988 08:48 | 15 |
|
RE: .13
There is a obvious and minor typo in the entry 79.13:
> by 3 of the new seven year year car loans. DCU is competing against
was supposed to be:
by 3 of the new seven year car loans. DCU is competing against
^
extra "year" removed!
Carl
|