[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | TeamLinks for Windows |
Notice: | Kit and ECO locations: See replies to note 8. o note 8. |
Moderator: | ORION::chayna.zko.dec.com::tamara::eppes AN |
|
Created: | Mon Aug 28 1995 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2238 |
Total number of notes: | 9650 |
Hi
I have a problem on a customer site as described below.
Software products and versions are:
TeamLinks V2.7
ALL-IN-1 V3.2
DDS V3.3-313
The customer has two address entries in DDS, thus:
Mike McKenna,
1=us@2=admd@3=ca.gov@5=lc@4=lcmw1@*\common=mike mckenna
and,
Mike Zawilski,
1=us@2=admd@3=ca.gov@5=asm@4=lcex1@*\rfc-822=mike.zawilski(a)lc.ca.gov
Doing an address lookup to DDS from an ALL-IN-1 VT client yields normal
and expected results, the Pretty Name is displayed at the To: prompt on
the message for both of the address types above.
However, when TeamLinks is used as the client the behaviour is different.
Looking up the first address, for Mike McKenna, yields normal results;
the Pretty Name is displayed in TeamLinks To: box. But for the other
address, Mike Zawilski, the Pretty Name is not displayed, and only
the actual "technical address" is displayed.
Are the parentheses that replace the '@' sign causing the problem here,
with the algorithm that works out how to display the address information?
Any help is appreciated.
Kieran
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1983.1 | I need to know what you get and what you expect | MANANA::draft.zko.dec.com::manana::lawrence | TeamLinks Engineering, DTN 381-0747 | Thu May 15 1997 11:56 | 9 |
| Hi,
Would it be possible to enter what you get back
from the vt client and what you get back from TeamLinks
exactly.
Cheers,
jal
|