T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1998.1 | I like our fishfinder | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Feb 25 1993 09:45 | 35 |
| re .0:
>>> Question: Can I avoid running aground having a fishfinder ?
A fishfinder is basically nothing more than a depthsounder. It will not
make running aground more or less likely compared to using a standard
sailing depthsounder.
We have an inexpensive (< $200 US) Apelco XCD250 fishfinder. It is
a rather neat device. It has a digital depth display, independent deep
and shallow water alarms (nice if you're trying to stay in a channel or
between depth contours), and a variable speed scrolling analog depth
display. The analog depth display allows you to see trends (eg, the
depth is increasing or decreasing and how rapidly) and to estimate the
roughness and hardness of the bottom. Should you care, it will also show on
the analog display any schools of fish that happen to be under you. The
digital depth reading is supposed to be the bottom depth.
The liquid crystal display is hard to read in bright sunlight, especially
with polarized sunglasses. We use ours mostly for anchoring as the
display on our older Signet digital depthsounder is much easier to read.
Also, the physical design of the fishfinder is such that it cannot be
bulkhead mounted. When using ours we temporarily mount it on the top
step of the companionway ladder (where sooner or later someone will trip
over it, no doubt).
The transducer has the usual (200kHz) frequency and beam width. Ours is
installed inside the hull in box filled with mineral oil. Nonetheless,
it will read depths over 200 feet.
By the way, with one depth sounder you know exactly what the depth is.
With two, you're never quite certain since they'll rarely give the same
reading. Our Apelco and Signet have disagreed by as much as 10%.
Alan
|
1998.2 | we have the technology... | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Thu Feb 25 1993 11:22 | 31 |
|
I was a sonar designer in a past life- first for the Navy, then
for bottom charting by Scripps, Woods Hole, etc. So, I thought
I could just grab a high frequency transducer (for a narrow beam)
and mount it to look forward.
No such luck.
1) Mounting is a PAIN. It has to be at least a half-foot deep to
avoid bubbles and get a good contact with water, so the
keel is about it. Drill a keel, install wires? Not easy.
2) Flow noise. For comparison, open your sunroof. Nice easy
breezes, pretty quiet, even at 55, right? Now, go
into forward-looking mode. Stick your head OUT the
sunroof. Not easy to hear the radio, right? Of course
with DSP, and other easy smarts, this may be gotten by
easily- especially with a rather blunt leading edge.
3) At 1-3 feet of depth, there's considerably more bubbles,
garbage, fish, etc. for the beam to hit, than a downward
facing beam. Again, smarts could help, but a penncil-thin
beam doesn't know a rock from a bubble from a bass. The
fishfinder wins this one.
So the sonar companies will sell you what they've got, till
somebody makes, say, a multielement transducer, adds the smarts
from the fishfinder AND false imaging. Not really all that tough
for a big company.
Scott.
|
1998.3 | Sonar | SALEM::GILMAN | | Thu Feb 25 1993 11:35 | 28 |
| I too have an Apelco, a 350 model.
"can I avoid running aground with a fishfinder"?
Yes, but it depends. My fishfinder (strictly downward looking)
with transom transducer SAVED me from running into a BIG unmarked
rock right in the middle of a lake. The rock was about 6 inches under,
just enough so I couldn't see it but certainly would have hit the damm
thing.
I usually run with my fishfinder on all the time... not looking for
fish, but watching the depth. In the above incident the bottom started
coming up, FAST, I chopped the throttle, and there was the rock smack
in front of me. I stopped in time thanks to the fishfinder.
If there was a rock on a horizontal bottom rather than a rock on a rise
the fishfinder would never have seen the rock... I would have hit it
before the transducer got near it.
So, it depends on bottom characteristics.
In general its a great AID to navigation, no question of that! But
it doesn't replace common sense and vigilence with YOUR EYES, ears
and brain.
I don't know how I got along without it now.
Jeff
|
1998.4 | Trends | SALEM::GILMAN | | Thu Feb 25 1993 11:37 | 8 |
| One more thing. A depthsounder give you typically a digital depth read
out only.
The fishfinder gives you a digital depth, AND a real time bottom
display which shows BOTTOM TRENDS (rising?) which is a major advantage
IMO over a depth sounder.
Jeff
|
1998.5 | Good for Rock Cod ? | OTOOA::MOWBRAY | This isn't a job its an Adventure | Thu Feb 25 1993 12:31 | 3 |
| They shound like great devices.
Oh by the way, do they find fish ?
|
1998.6 | SONAR | SALEM::GILMAN | | Thu Feb 25 1993 14:41 | 13 |
| Do they find fish?
Oh.... yeah.... they do.... sort of. At least I have never been SURE that the
little fish that cross the screen are really fish, but I think alot
of them are. Any object that has the right density the fishfinder
will think is a fish and display it as a fish.
Actually they DO find fish, the problem is telling what ARE NOT fish.
And, IMO they should't be called fish finders. That is a marketing
gimick to lure fishermen into buying them. They should be called
for what they are.... SONAR, which, by the way, can also spot fish.
Jeff
|
1998.7 | where is what ? | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Mon Mar 01 1993 03:34 | 22 |
| thanks for the info.
I'm going to buy a fishfinder. Only one question left.
What does it display ?
/-------\
/------/ \
1 -------/ \------------------ 2
is 1 left and 2 right of your sounder or
is 1 forward and 2 behind of you sounder or
what ?
thanks Peter
|
1998.8 | Fish | SALEM::GILMAN | | Tue Mar 02 1993 11:55 | 25 |
| Peter... it displays one point in real time... the right hand
extreme point of the display. Moving to the left as on graph paper
type movement is the history of the bottom passing under you. You
can vary the speed of the 'graph paper' movement, vary the scale,
put in bottom or shallow water alarms, fish alarm, and often temp
in F or C, speed of the boat in knots, mph, or kph. They can be
a veritable instrument panel in one, which mine is. Oh, you can
also zoom in on bottom features.
A bottom of the line fishfinder won't give you boat speed or water
temp, but will give you most of the other features.
The hardness of the bottom is also represented by the depth of the
band of the display... i.e. a soft bottom might look like this:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
and a hard bottom
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
but it takes practice.... quite a bit of it in fact to extract all the
info the readout is telling you.
Jeff
|
1998.9 | London Calling... | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Tue Mar 02 1993 12:16 | 7 |
|
This months Practical Sailor describes a forward-looker, from
Britain. About $US800. Letter was pretty sparse on info, but
gave address & phone #. Would be mighty nice, in Boston Harbor
area...
BiffBangCrashOuch!
|
1998.10 | | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Wed Mar 03 1993 02:16 | 5 |
| OK, everything clear. Thanks for the clarification and the help.
Peter
|
1998.11 | Which fishfinder should I buy ? | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Mon Mar 08 1993 05:51 | 26 |
| I can get the cheapest "Eagle" either in Germany or Switzerland.
Nothing else.
U.K is offering all models thru mailorder. But no pricing and no
details.
I have a 1991 spring "Bliss marine" catalog. The price range at that
time was from 133$ for the cheapest Hummingbird to 500$ for the 3D
from Hummingbird.
3 models from "Eagle". The cheaper for 140$ and then going up to 280$
for the model with seatemperatur and speed.
I have no access to more info.
I'm looking for a "fishfinder" in LCD technology, no speed/temperatur
sensor, transom mounted (but I'm going to use it inboard with the oil
and do not worry about the reduced sensitivity).
Question: is there anything new on the US market ? If possible from
Bliss marine, as I have all the information I need to order from them
which covers the above requirements ?
If there is nothing new, I'm going to order the Eagle in the medium
price range (1991 $170) and hope for the best.
Peter
|
1998.12 | | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Mar 08 1993 09:18 | 13 |
| re .11:
Peter,
We are quite happy with our Apelco XCD-250. It is more user-friendly
than some others I've looked at and it does work well. The XCD-250 is a
depth-only unit, no water temperature or boat speed or loran interface
or anything else. Price is about $180 US, as I recall.
Bliss Marine is not the best choice of vendor. I much prefer West
Marine. I'll check their current catalog tonight.
Alan
|
1998.13 | Fishfind | SALEM::GILMAN | | Mon Mar 08 1993 11:50 | 6 |
| Peter, I second the recommendation for an APELCO XD 250.
The only complaint I have against LCD fishfinders is that the display
is very hard to read when wearing polarized sunglasses.
Jeff
|
1998.14 | UK prices | RDGENG::BEVAN | | Tue Mar 09 1993 06:25 | 17 |
| Peter,
Here's some current UK prices all in UK pounds sterling from PBO March93
� Supplier tel
HUMMINGBIRD LCR400 1D 119.90 TELESONIC ** (0)71 837 4106
" 3D 299 LYC (0)71 247 0521
EAGLE SUPRA 1D 159 PUMPKIN MARINE (0)71 480 6630
(Apelco not listed at all)
** listed as special offer so price won't last long.
These prices include VAT, so can get 17.5% removed, then add post and import
tax. All take plastic by phone. UK code is +44 and leave out the "0" on the
area code.let me know by mail if you have any problems.
Steve
|
1998.15 | Apelco is difficult to "hang" | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Tue Mar 09 1993 09:22 | 16 |
| Oh thanks for the help.
I checked this in my old Bliss Marine Catalog and I can not
use the Apelco. My current depthfinder is hanging from the wheelhouse
roof and thats the only space left. The Apelco can only be mounted
on a horizontal surface. The Eagle can be converted somehow to
be "hanged".
So it must be an Eagle. Alan, can you provide me with the FAX #
of your prefered mailorder house ? Even if it is not much cheaper,
but I need a new source for equipment anyway. Alan, do you have
the price for an Eagle Magna and the price for an Eagle Fish ID II ?
The Eagle Ultra is to expensiv and has to many features.
Peter
|
1998.16 | Save the shipping charges | JUPITR::KEENAN | | Wed Mar 10 1993 11:15 | 2 |
| West Marine just opened a store in E. Greenwich, RI. Their number
is (401) 884-0900. They are close to Rt 95, on Division St.
|
1998.17 | West Marine | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Mar 12 1993 12:17 | 20 |
| re .15:
Peter,
West Marine's FAX number for international orders is 408-728-4360.
Telephone order number is 408-728-4430. They accept MasterCard, Visa,
American Express, and Discover plastic money. West's customer service is
outstanding, in my experience.
Bad news is that they don't stock (according to their 1993 master
catalog) the bottom of the line Eagle. The cheapest Eagle in the catalog
is the Magna II Plus, which includes water temperature and boat speed
for $259 US. (West also doesn't list the Apelco fishfinders, but BOAT/US
does.)
The contributors to the powerboats notesfile (VICKI::BOATS) and the
fishing notesfile (I don't know where this one is) probably know much
more about fishfinders and where to buy them.
Alan
|
1998.18 | Overton's again | TFH::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:15 | 11 |
| Overton's
Eagle Supra I.D. $ 134.95
Eagle Magna II 169.95 (with temp/distance log display 219.95)
tel.from outside US 919-355-7600
credit card orders may be placed any time via Fax 919-355-2923.
Overton's is a powerbot,fishing catalog and I am impress with
some of their prices.
Could it be that powerboters became poor like us :^)
|
1998.19 | | MEMIT::HO | | Fri Mar 12 1993 17:45 | 11 |
| I've had some success getting non catalog merchandise from West Marine.
After listening to me explain what I needed, the telephone order taker
looked up the item in the manufacturer's catalog and had them ship
directly to me. Since it was an East coast outfit, the item arrived
much sooner than it would have if it were a regularly stocked item.
They, and probably any other marine electronics vendor, could get the
low end fish finder for you if you tell them what you want.
|
1998.20 | | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Mon Mar 15 1993 02:04 | 7 |
| Thank you very much for the info. I will order one soon.
Alan, I checked the fishing notesfile. Looks like, a lot of people
own an Eagle, with some Apelco's. Hummingbirds are not very
popular, but nobody knows why.
Peter
|
1998.21 | Genfer see user | GVPROD::MEYER | Nick, DTN 7-821-4172 | Tue Mar 23 1993 08:59 | 12 |
| Hi Peter,
Should you come down to Geneva, I could show you the
Eagle ID fitted to my sailing boat. Works great & it is the second one
I've owned. I mount the transducer off the ladder whilst sailing.
and the display is mounted on a 30cm square board in the cockpit, all
easily removeable when I lock up the boat.
I enjoy fishing in light winds & can see tons of fish.
However the problem is that the hungry fish are not highlighted.
It is fun to see the bottom up to 300meters (1000ft) & the for ever
changing display keeps kids fully occupied, just like TV.
Nick
|
1998.22 | | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Wed Mar 24 1993 02:32 | 10 |
| Hi Nick, you still alive ? We met some 17 years ago in Paris, you as
teacher and me as a newhire doing my first PDP11 courses. No travel
this days anymore. Thanks for the offer.
I will order next week an Eagle, either in the UK or in the US. I have
not decided yet.
Peter
|
1998.23 | Waiting now.... | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Tue Mar 30 1993 02:14 | 8 |
| Alan, I understand now, why you are biased towards West Marine.
I send out a FAX to Bliss, West and Cruisermart (UK). West replayed
the same working day, Cruisermart after 2 days and Bliss not yet.
I have ordered now from West.
Peter
|
1998.24 | it works | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Tue Apr 13 1993 09:04 | 11 |
| I received my Magna II from West last week and installed it in the
boat. I glued the transducer to the hull and I was all set.
It works fine, goes down to 900 feet. My mooring used to be at 135
feet with my old dephtmeter, now its at 113 feet. I will soon
check the real depht manualy.
Thanks everybody for the help.
Peter
|
1998.25 | Where did you mount it? | DPDMAI::CLEVELAND | Grounded on The Rock | Tue Apr 13 1993 18:54 | 12 |
| Peter,
Where did you glue the transducer and how much hull/keel are you
sending the signal through? I'm wanting to do this in my boat as well
and am trying to figure out how to use a transom mounted transducer
without having to spend an extra $80 for the thru-hull version, thus
keeping the existing one in place as well.
What did you use to glue it in place with?
Thanks,
Robert
|
1998.26 | Back a bit and left a bit | RDGENG::BEVAN | | Tue Apr 13 1993 19:17 | 22 |
| re: .25
My boat has a transducer that fires through the hull. The transducer
is mounted in a vertical tube which is glued to the glass-fibre hull with
Araldite. The glue also acts as a seal between tube and hull for about
1/2 inch of castor oil in the bottom of the tube, enough to cover the
lower face of the transducer. The oil "connects" the transducer output
to the hull which in turn connects with the water. This arrangement
allows for the transducer to fire vertically down even though the bilge
has already started to turn up by about 15 degrees. The transducer is
about 2 foot behind the trailing edge of the keel and 1 foot off the
hull fore/aft centre-line. I'm guessing that puts it outside of the
main keel turbulance. I've no idea what the hull thickness is at that
point since I have a basic aversion to holes in boats.
The transducer is intended for firing through the hull and is sealed
against the oil. The make is Seafarer (UK), a cheap unit good for
about 130 foot. I believe its possible to damage a transducer by
firing it without a load(=seawater or oil+seawater) so take care.
Steve
|
1998.27 | I used 6" pvc cleanout | UNIFIX::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Wed Apr 14 1993 09:25 | 8 |
| My transducer is mounted in a 6" pvc "cleanout" from the plumbing
supply house. I countoured the bottom to match the curve of the hull,
stuck it down with epoxy and filled it w/ mineral oil. It has been
working fine for 4 years. I get readings up to 199', where my
depthsounder runs out of digits.
"No-holes-below-the-waterline-Bill"
|
1998.28 | Success or failure of internal transducer | MUZICK::THOMPSON | Mike LMO2-1/M13 | Wed Apr 14 1993 12:29 | 11 |
|
I'm intending to install a depth guage this spring. I was very
intrigued by the previous two replies as avoiding another
through-hole appeals to me.
Does anyone else out there use the "internal method" with some
some container filled with mineral oil?
DID ANYONE EXPERIENCE POOR RESULTS?
Mike
|
1998.29 | works well | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Apr 14 1993 13:07 | 7 |
| I've used the internal method with three different depthsounders -- it
worked well with all three. I'm currently using an epoxy-coated mineral
oil-filled plywood box to hold the transducer for my backup
depthsounder.
One caution: This only works with a solid fiberglass hull. If the hull
is foam or balsa cored, you'll need to cut a hole through the hull.
|
1998.30 | You can do it! | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Wed Apr 14 1993 14:21 | 17 |
|
Or, what I did for a friend who had a Baltek-cored hull: I knew
that the internal layer of glass was pretty thin, compared to the
overall thickness. So I carefully cut a `glass plug from the inside,
chiseled out the balsa, and glued in the thru-hull, making it as
strong, I hope, as the surrounding structure. Certainly stiffer than
the core!
Now, service is pretty much impossible, but the sounder has been OK
for 6 years now. Better than my boatyard-installed unit. I don't think
that gain needed adjustment because of the install.
FWIW-
Scott_who_had_to_fair_the_transducer_in.
|
1998.31 | Another success | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Thu Apr 15 1993 12:10 | 3 |
| I did an internal thru the glass shot as well.. many years .. no
problems.
Bob
|
1998.32 | | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Fri Apr 16 1993 04:56 | 27 |
| My previous echosunder was factory installed. It used a tube, glued
in and filled with oil. It was leeking from the beginning, and after
1 year I gave up, refilling the tube. I used epoxi and it worked fine
until 2 month ago.
The new tranceiver from Eagle looks completly different. Its eggshaped
and not designed to be put in oil. The manual from Eagle recommanded
to glue it directly to the hull. (if the hull is solid) . I was
very sceptical:
/
keel / hull
/
---- /
| /
|O/ transducer
|/
|
|
|
I could not find a place in the bilge, where i could glue in the
tranducer on a flat surface. So I moved the boat to 100 feet of water,
put a lot of Araldit between the keel and the body of the hull, and it
worked! As it takes 5 minutes to harden, I had plenty of time to
check that the fishfinder was working properly.
|
1998.33 | In-Hull Transducer | SNOC01::RADKEHOWARD | | Fri Apr 16 1993 18:21 | 17 |
| Re: .28
On a previous sailboat I internally mounted the transducer on the
center-line, aft of the fin keel. The approach was to first build up a
flat and level surface on the hull by constructing a paper 'dam' about
2" in diameter, then filling it with quick hardening epoxy. After the
epoxy had cured I lightly sanded the surface (using a block) to insure
that it was flat. The final step was to mount the transducer (which
also had a flat surface) to the epoxy by using a very thin layer of
silicone sealant.
This approach worked great on a rather thin hulled Catalina 27. The
Coastal Navigator depth sounder would easily read to 200'. This
approach avoided another hole in the hull, and having to deal with
mineral oil plus container et al.
Howard
|
1998.34 | Is Transducer power relavent? | DPDMAI::CLEVELAND | Grounded on The Rock | Fri Apr 16 1993 19:16 | 10 |
| Thanks for all the input!
Next question: I talked to the folks in the newly opended West Marine
here in Dallas. They recommend I use a transducer that outputs 100watts
of signal, vs the more standard 35watts of signal since I'm going to be
shooting through about a 1.25" fiberglass hull (a racing machine, it's
not). Interphase makes the units that have this kind of output,
Hummingbird has the 35w output. Anyone ever hearing of this making a
difference as far as depth penetration and accuracy are concerned? I
have a solid glass hull. No coring.
|
1998.35 | how much input power? | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Apr 19 1993 09:57 | 8 |
| re .last:
Before you get a depthsounder with a higher output power, you might want
to check the 12V DC input power. Depending on your battery capacity,
recharging system, and how much you use the depthsounder, this might be
an important consideration.
Alan
|
1998.36 | | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Mon Apr 19 1993 12:23 | 11 |
| re: -1
100 watt is not the DC load. My Eagle is sending with 35 watts and
hardly uses more then 350 mA/12 V.
I would not bother to buy a new transducer. I get down to 900+ feets
with the standard 35 watt transducer and it has to go thru at least
15 mm of Araldit before it hits the hull.
Peter
|
1998.37 | Mine uses 5 mA | RDGENG::BEVAN | | Tue Apr 20 1993 07:27 | 9 |
| (I think) I remember the literature with my Seafarer depth sounder saying
that the transducer output power is 80 Watts, but the duty cycle is v.short,
something like 1/4 millisecond every second.
This makes the drain on the battery very low. The Seafarer runs for 100 hours
on 6 penlight cells (0.5 amp-hours). I guess there is no reason for other
depth sounders to be very "juicy". Fit and forget.
Steve
|
1998.38 | check the specifications | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Apr 21 1993 13:10 | 6 |
| re .37:
Ah, but not all depthsounders are the same. I have two. One draws
between 0.4 and 0.9 amps DC depending on the brightness of the display.
The other draws <0.5 amp DC. Both are fairly low power, shallow water
(<300') depthsounders.
|