T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1984.1 | Ask an oar maker | STAR::KENNEY | | Mon Jan 04 1993 16:25 | 8 |
|
There is a formular of sorts but I do not know what it is. It is
based on beam of boat, oarlock height above water and some other
factors that I forget. I tried to get the oar maker to tell me what
his formular was, no luck. I did not press him real hard for it maybe
if I did I would have gotten it.
Forrest
|
1984.2 | 6.5' oars should work well | UNIFIX::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Tue Jan 05 1993 08:08 | 12 |
| I have a homemade (by Paul Sears and Evan Suits) 8' dinghy of Phil Bolger
design.
His plans call for 6.5' oars. I took an 8' pair and cut them down
by cutting, boring, dowelling (1"), pinning with 1/4" dowels and
glueing/filling with polyester resin. They seem to feel about right
for rowing.
Bill
|
1984.3 | Views of a rowing purist! | DEMOAX::GINGER | Ron Ginger | Tue Jan 05 1993 08:31 | 43 |
| For rowing, oars should be about as long as possible. I like 8' on my
smallest boat, a 12' peapod. I have 9' on my 17' dory.
For storage and handling, especially in a dink, you usually wind up
with oars sized to fit inside the boat. Wrong reason, and why most
people think rowing is lousy and buy those damn little outboards.
In one of John Gardners books he has a quote something to the effect
"if people treated horseback riding like they view rowing, they would
teach it on water buffalos, and no one would think riding fun". Rowing
a normal dink, with two short oars, usually placed too low on the
rail and too close together, makes a lousy trip.
The second thing wrong with most oars, is their construction. The junk
you buy in boat stores wouldnt make good clubs. The handles are
shaped wrong- your hands are not barrell shaped, they dont fit on
barrell shaped handles. Handles should be made cone shaped, with the
apex toward the blade, large end out. NEVER put any kind of finish on
an oar handle- only bare wood. Finished handles cause sliding and
blisters.
Oars should also be counterbalanced. The area between lock and handle
should be left square, and as large as possible to help ballance the
blade. Sometimes we even add lead into the loom.
Oars should also be light- ash or oak is about the worst possible
material. If you intend to use your oars as a general stick or club,
then oak or ash is ok, but if you intend to row with it, use spruce. My
better oars have spruce shafts with cedar blades.
Unfortunately, you cant buy a decent oar, you must make them. Shaw and
Tenny in Maine do a close job, but not quite. Shew and Burnham in S.
Bristol Maine will make custom oars for not bad prices, but they dont
stock anything, only make to order, usually with a boat attached :-)
In case you havent guessed, rowing is a hot button for me! It offends
me to see the usuall dink being yanked across a harbor with the
misshappen clubs most people have for oars.
If anyone is interested in good oars look for a book BOATS, OARS AND
ROWING by Pete Culler, published by Internation Marine. I can also
expound on oars and rowing at length- although I havent done one of my
oar making seminars for a few years.
|
1984.4 | Where's the Zodiac? | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Tue Jan 05 1993 11:27 | 11 |
|
As if 2 more � is needed-
Just like a powerboat makes a lousy sailboat & vice versa, a good
pulling shell is no fun with 2 kids/ spouse/ dog/ ice/ baggage/
waves/ etc. which all exist out there. The basic flatbottom tou
see towed around will come to pretty much a dead stop when you stop
pulling for your life- but you can climb aboard your 4-feet-above-
water deck with a minumum of teetering. Aso, is a pretty peapod
gonna last long on the Vinyard shore in July? Ugly is more secure.
Scott_who_drools_at_the_wooden_boat_show_but_owns_warped_oars
|
1984.5 | | DEMOAX::GINGER | Ron Ginger | Tue Jan 05 1993 15:58 | 10 |
| I agree a shell would make a lousy tender, but there are many nice
designs for small boats which will both row and tow well. My 12' Peapod
is one example, Ive towed it a few hundred miles (behind a Friendship
sloop) with no trouble, and its a delight to row.
A pram is about the ugliest possible choice ( I dont even view Zodiacs
as choices), and wont row or tow worth a damn.
I have no answer to the 'ugly prevents theft' argument. Sadly its
probably true.
|
1984.6 | Tender Designs | SNOC01::RADKEHOWARD | | Tue Jan 05 1993 20:12 | 10 |
| Ron,
Although this is straying from the basenote I am interested in your
recommendations for tender designs which both row and tow well. We are
considering buying a basic fiberglass shell and finishing it ourselves.
Suggestions?
Cheers,
Howard
|
1984.7 | Shaw & Tenney | SMURF::YELGIN | | Wed Jan 06 1993 13:13 | 10 |
| Shaw & Tenney describes the formula for oar lengths in their catalog.
I'll post it here when I get a chance.
Lou
P.S. I'm also interested in a discussion of rowing tenders. I'm
thinking of building the Catspaw Dinghy or something similar.
Does Ron have any comments on this design? Perhaps someone should
start another note on tenders.
|
1984.9 | O.K I will ask | TFH::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Fri Jan 08 1993 11:39 | 19 |
|
re : .8
Since I haven't been inside MIT,I only use to pass by when I was living
in Cambridge, I 'll ask :-)
How do you find the lenth with that formula.
Let's assume X (inboard lenth) = 8 feet
Oar lenth = (8'/7)*25=28.57. Cannot find 28 feet Oar.
What I do wrong.Before I posted this note I sawed the formula to a
couple engineers recently graduated from colledge.
They solve it the same way as I.They only questioned what the inboard
lenth is?
Thanx everybody for your help.I do appreciate it.
I was going to get a 6.5' as it was suggested on one of the notes,but
I would like to know what lenth the formula of the professionals calls
for.
|
1984.10 | formula may be right | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Jan 08 1993 12:34 | 17 |
| re .8:
Inboard length may refer to the length of oar inboard of the rowlock,
ie, the distance from the rower's hand to the rowlock. This inboard
length might be about half the beam of the dinghy. For a dinghy with
beam of 4', the formula would then give an oar length of (2/7)*25 =
7.1'. This sounds about right.
There are some tradeoffs regarding oar length. Shorter oars mean shorter
strokes and more strokes per minute for the same speed (more or less).
The blades of shorter oars are closer to the water on the back stroke,
making catching them in a chop much more likely (which is why I need to
raise the rowlock height on our dingy_rows_tows_and_powers_poorly
dinghy). Lomger oars may require more strength to row. Our oars are 6'
and I'd like them to be longer.
Alan
|
1984.11 | Sorry | SMURF::YELGIN | | Fri Jan 08 1993 12:43 | 5 |
| I think Alan's explanation is correct. However, I'll check the
Shaw & Tenney catalog again and post another note. Sorry to have
caused confusion.
Lou
|
1984.12 | More Oar Length Rocket Science | MEMIT::HO | | Fri Jan 08 1993 12:48 | 13 |
| Here's a formula requiring a less rigorous educational background:
Length of oar = longest dimension of car interior with all doors and
windows closed.
With my compact car this yields a length of about 6 feet. The oars
work very well on my 8.5' pram.
As a plus, the oars are short enough so that two people sitting
abreast can row. This has to happen when there are four persons in my
two person rated dinghy.
- gene
|
1984.13 | I knew formula O.K. | TFH::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Fri Jan 08 1993 14:12 | 29 |
| I really hesitated a lot before I posted .8. As a matter of fact that's
why I went and ask the college guys just to make sure I do not make
a complete fool of myself. Because I knew the formula had to be correct
otherwise Alan would have jumped in :^) That's the reason I waited
so long also. Thanks Alan.If you only knew how much I depend on you..
re: .3
Ron,
I cannot afford that kind of money for oars for a plastic dingy.
I believe you have a wooden boat,wooden dingy wooden everything.:-)
Gee.. you must roll in money :-)
re: .12
Gene,
I like your method. As a matter of fact I use similar methods myself.
That's the reason you read in this file my many questions for help.
On the other hand people that they see what I actualy do they kind
look strangely at me. What's the matter with them?
Thanx all again.
P.S. Dingy width appx. 4' Decision : Buy Oars 6 1/2'-7'.
|
1984.14 | Oars too low | AIDEV::THOMPSON | Mike LMO2-1/M13 | Fri Jan 08 1993 15:38 | 9 |
| re: .10
Alan,
How did you raise the hight of the oarlocks?
In my dingy with two people and gear, the oars are parallel
to the water and about 1/4 below the top of my knees!
Mike
|
1984.15 | | DEMOAX::GINGER | Ron Ginger | Tue Jan 12 1993 09:27 | 12 |
| Re: .13, I dont roll in money, to the contrary, I have all wood things
because Im to cheap to buy others. My oars cost only about $5 per pair,
plus a few hours of shop work, which I find very relaxing. All my boats
are wood, because I build them as well.
As to raising oarlocks, one method is to make a shaft extension. Ive
seen rowlocks with shafts of 10-12". You could make a set of extensions
form old prop shafts, by turning one end to pin diameter, and boring
the other to fit the lock. These could be brazed to the oar lock. All
this assumes you have a small machine shop available - doesnt everyone
:-)
|
1984.16 | The REAL Formula (Honest!) | SMURF::YELGIN | | Tue Jan 12 1993 09:47 | 25 |
| Hi All,
Here's the fully explained formula from the Shaw and Tenney catalog:
Oar Length = (X/7)*25
where X equals the Inboard Length (IBL).
IBL is defined as 1/2 the span between rowlocks plus 2 inches.
So, a boat with a span of 48" would have an IBL of (48/2)+2 or
26". The recommended oar length would be (26/7)*25 or about 93".
I would use this as a guide and try to experiment with different
sizes to see what felt comfortable for you and your boat. Of course,
this is not always possible, especially if you are ordering your oars
via the mail.
The address and phone number for Shaw and Tenney is:
20 Water Street
Orono, Maine 04473
207-866-4867
|
1984.17 | Optimum length !!!!! | TRUCKS::KERVILL_G | | Tue Jan 19 1993 08:48 | 51 |
| Hi Mike,
> The dinghy is 8 1/2 ' long and needs a pair of oars.
> Are there any rules or specks for the lenth of the oars in regard
> to the dinghy or the rower?
In the limit condition: long oars are heavy and take energy to lift,
overcome wind resistance etc.....
In the limit condition: short oars will need to be moved over a wide angle to
dip them into, and over, the water.
The ideal oar length will let you sway back-and--forth at a comforatable rate;
whilst the dingy is travelling at its best speed.
i.e. you arn't thrasing the waves because you cannot maintain boat speed with
short oars, etc.
So, depending on the taper (and weight distribution) of the oar and how you
intend to row. (e.g. Shorter oars work bestter in choppy seas) It's up to you.
One practical limitation worth considering. Can you stow them? Oars which
will not stow will eventually become snagged on a warp and be flicked out of
the boat when your back is turned.
Advise, Start with the longest ones you can stow. Try them for a week or so
then shorted them a few inches. If you find that does not improve them then
leave them alone.
Best regards
Gregg
P.S. I got axed before Xmas; so unless I find something before March this may
be good-bye.
If you're sailing in Solent waters please call me on channel 16 and 77.
"Sandpiper"
|
1984.18 | I use 8' | NWD002::SASLOW_ST | STEVE | Tue Jan 19 1993 13:10 | 1 |
| I have a 9' dinghy (Livingston) and use 8' oars. They are fine.
|
1984.19 | Oar's lenth have been growing | TFH::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Thu Jan 21 1993 14:27 | 17 |
| re: .17
Hi Gregg,
I did have deside between 6 1/2'-7.00' but from the later responses
I redecided that the oars are going to be at least 7 feet in lenth.
By the way, I am on the other side of the pond but when I was younger,
that is much younger,I spent some of the most beautiful months of
my life in Harwich Essex aboard laid up tramp cargo vessels on Stoor
River. God bless England and the Queen but I don't believe I'll be in
in Solent in the near future.Maybe Bahamas....
Sorry to hear you been " axed". Hope you find something else.
Wish you the best.
Mike K.
|