| re .0:
I'm a little puzzled. What do you mean by "seam damage near the keel"?
While I am not familiar with the keel construction of the Tartan Ten, it
may well have external ballast (presumably lead) bolted to a fiberglass
stub that is part of the hull. If this is the case, there will indeed be
a seam in the keel that is actually the joint between the ballast and the
fiberglass portions of the keel.
Since it is difficult at best to get the top surface of the ballast and
the bottom surface of the fiberglass stub perfectly flat, there will be
gaps when the two are bolted together. Usually bedding compound is
slathered on top of the ballast before it is bolted to the stub. Bottom
paint does not typically adhere well to the bedding compound, and thus
the joint is often visible. This is not necessarily a sign of a problem,
damage, or improper construction.
Several years ago we covered the joint on our boat with three layers of
epoxy and fiberglass tape of varying width and then carefully faired the
fiberglass stub and the lead ballast. Since then the joint has been
quite invisible and there have been no cracks in the covering layers of
epoxy/fiberglass.
Alan
|
| Tartan Tens are primarily racing boats based on a Sparkman+Stephens (as
most Tartans) hull plan. Compared to 1980's vintage boats, they are on
the heavy side (read that as a major plus). Most aren't too
comfortable below, however they have an excellent deck layout. You
don't indicate the age of the boats that you've looked at. Stress
cracking would make sense on older boats that have been raced hard.
I know that other Tartans (30's 27's and 34's) do not exhibit a lot of
keel joint flexing.
|