T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1779.1 | Anchors??? | HPSRAD::HOWARTH | | Tue Aug 27 1991 16:31 | 11 |
| re: .0
Congratulations on your preparations and success with the
storm. Would you elaborate on your anchors relating to scope,
chain and the angles that you set them relative to each other?
I also survived without damage in Fairhaven on a slip at the
shipyard. Tied things down well, removed the dodger and wrapped
the head sail and the main with line.
Joe
|
1779.2 | Anchors in Bob | TALLIS::DOLL | | Wed Aug 28 1991 13:16 | 9 |
| One of the reasons we wanted shallow water was to have a large scope.
on the anchors. From the bow cleats to the bottom we had about 7 ft.
before any surge. We put out 150 ft of line, about 20 to 1 scope.
This reduced the pull and also the chafing due to a smaller angle
at the bow. I have 10 ft. of chain on all anchors even though
less is recommended. The two smaller anchors were about 80 degrees
to the left and right of the main one. They pulled if the wind
shifted or if the boat oscillated on the main one.
|
1779.3 | More questions | ACTHUB::RYAN | | Wed Aug 28 1991 19:44 | 4 |
| I'm curious about one thing: how do you think your boat would have
faired if the wing shifted substantially?
Bob
|
1779.4 | Hurricane Experiance from Edgartown | TOLKIN::HILL | | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:48 | 52 |
| I rode out Bob on my boat in Edgartown Harbor. I was heading for Nova
Scotia and decided to stop in Edgartown Saturday to let the storm
go by. (Very glad we did).
The things my wife and I learned was we were not prepared. I added a
line to the mooring chain, set out an anchor stripped the boat
and stayed on to motor into the wind.
The mooring I was on was against the Chapaquidic shore so we had
protection from everything but a wind from the south. After about three
hours the wind did go South and that was when everythin happened. Boats
broke loose and flew through the harbor hitting others on the way to
the beach.
I am going to add for next season is two 20-30 foot lengths of 3/4
line with thimbles and shackles to attach to the mooring chain. Most
boat broke away because the did not have additional protection. I will
also have lengths of rubber hose to use as chafing gear.
I put out an anchor, but in the wrong place. I was primarily depending
on the mooring. Next time I will put out multiple anchors, covering
all potential danger areas.
We left our Avon inflated, wrong move. It flew through most of the
storm spinning around and hitting the stern pulpit. Next time I will
deflate it so it is just bouyant. It would then be a good raft to hang
onto if one had to leave the boat due to damage.
Motoring into the storm only works until your prop get fouled with
weeds. Mine ended as a big ball of grass which took a number of dives
to cut away.
One 47 footer hit us bow-on just aft of the cabin, cutting the
hull/deck joint, destroying a stanchion and breaking a life line.
However, by motoring I was able to duck around two other boats which
came at us.
I made the decision to stay with the boat based on a previous experince
when I anchored in Lake Tashmoo, and the fact we were close to shore. I
feel I could of reached shore safely in the case of a hit which would
have sunk my boat. I am sure if I hadn't stayed with the boat it would
have broken loose.
Some of the boats were left with sails on, particularly roller furling.
Most roller furling rigs ended up with rags. Another boat left a main
on under its cover. The cover came off, the sail went up the mast,
flailed around, and the mast broke. The sail went into the water, and
the additional pressure from wave broke the boat from its mooring.
We didn't get to Nova Scotia, but we did learn a bit more, and were
able to sail in the Cape area for the rest of my vacation.
|
1779.5 | lessons from Maine and back | NAS007::WINTERS | | Thu Sep 05 1991 11:33 | 39 |
| My experience aboard my J40, Hidden Valley, is described in 1776.38 and
has some "lessons learned" there as well.
re .0, I agree that hurricane holes have advantages over a harbor, at
least if you have adequate ground tackle. Don't think for a moment
however that you are safe from dragging boats!
re: .4 We deflated our dinghy somewhat and lashed it to the cabin top.
A few other boats also did this. Most however just tucked it up close
behind the stern. I didn't see any dinghys flying in the wind;
although our wind in Maine was only 60K not the 100+K you all suffered
through. Perhaps two lines from the port and starboard towing rings of
the dinghy to the stern cleats of your boat would have been more
stable.
Our strategy also was to motor into the wind if necessary also, but we
never needed to. Never though of dodging dragging boats via engine. I
suppose there is some danger of you snagging his rode or vice versa.
The nylon rodes near us extended out at only a small declining angle
and could have been snagged quite easily.
Setting spare anchors to supplement a mooring might work if they didn't
foul on nearby boats and moorings. It's hard to see how this wouldn't
happen in a crowded mooring field. I suppose you could hand set your
anchor(s) near your mooring as a contingency to breaking loose from
the mooring itself.
One thing I noticed after Bob was that many boats in harbors had their
pulpits smashed down. I presume this happened because the boat
continually had its bow pushed deep into the water. I wonder if the
pulpit could be protected by any of the following techniques: (1) add
weight to the bow so it came up more slowly, (2) use halyards to
provide vertical support above the pulpit, or (3) add vertical support
below the pulpit by making a wood (or some other material) support for
the horizontal bars of the pulpit. Anyone have experience here?
-gayn
|
1779.6 | All I remembered was what Bob did to the rivers... | GLITTR::JOHNHC | | Mon Dec 06 1993 08:41 | 9 |
| So, did anybody else catch the Allison ... story on network TV last
night? It was about a pregnant woman's survival on a life raft for 11
days with her two crew members after their boat went down in Hurricane
Bob.
Anybody out there see it and decide to plunk down the bucks for a new
EPIRB and GPS?
John H-C
|
1779.7 | | LEEL::LINDQUIST | | Mon Dec 06 1993 10:25 | 24 |
| �� So, did anybody else catch the Allison ... story on network TV last
�� night? It was about a pregnant woman's survival on a life raft for 11
�� days with her two crew members after their boat went down in Hurricane
�� Bob.
I thought it was entertaining, but with quite a bit of
'poetic license'. Just before they were overtaken by
Bob, they were 30 miles east of Cape Hatteras. And,
that was their planned location! They were right on
the storm track, and all they did was wait for it; when
they're home, they probably hope for phone solicitors.
Last week on ENTERTAINMENT TONIGHT, there was a short 'making
of...' about the movie. They had a half-dozen BIG stage
hands just off camera making the boat pitch and roll. And,
a big tank of water overhead, for those crashing waves.
The scenes while they were still on the boat were inside in a
pool, and the raft scenes were off a beach.
�� Anybody out there see it and decide to plunk down the bucks for a new
�� EPIRB and GPS?
A solar still, or a reverse-osmosis desalinator would have
been handy. Maybe a fish hook or two. Some epoxy that will
harden underwater. And of course, common sense.
|
1779.8 | It was entertaining, at least | MARX::CARTER | | Mon Dec 06 1993 13:00 | 23 |
| re .6:
A bunch of things come to mind, most of which should have been in an
abandon-ship bag, or easily spotted on a pre-departure check out.
An adequate number of SOLAS flares, parachute and handheld. Signal
mirror, first aid kit, food, water. An SSB, so a distress call could
be heard beyond the range of a VHF. An EPIRB for the sloop, and
another for the raft. A current certificate for the raft's service...
Where was the raft stowed? I don't remember seeing it when the boat
was first shown at the dock.
These people left on an offshore voyage with less of an equipment
check out, and less of a crewmate check out, than I would be
comfortable on a daysail on the ocean.
The movie reminded me of the type of cartoon I used to see, in which a
picture was shown, with a number of things which were wrong. The
cartoons were labelled "What's wrong with this picture?" This movie
could have paraphrased that name.
djc
|
1779.9 | Hurricane | SALEM::GILMAN | | Mon Dec 06 1993 14:11 | 16 |
| I too thought there was quite a bit of license taken with the movie.
In fact, it was so unconvincing I shut it off shortly after they got
on the raft.
The crew seemed awfully cavalier about the approaching weather. Except
of course the crew memember who tried to remind they had a pregant
woman on board and should be so flip about riding it out.
The scenerio reminded me of a horror movie whereby everybody KNOWS
there is a monster in the basement... but the stupid actor INSISTS on
going into the basement alone, with no weapon, etc. etc. In this movie
they should have KNOWN hurricanes are nothing to fool with yet they
'went into the basement anyway'.
Jeff
|
1779.10 | ? | DKAS::JOHNHC | | Tue Dec 14 1993 10:26 | 8 |
| Here's what amazed me about the show:
How much money that USCG search must have cost.
In situations like this, does the captain of the vessel have to pay the
USCG for its services?
John H-C
|
1779.11 | everybody does something stupid once in their life | WRKSYS::SCHUMANN | | Tue Dec 14 1993 11:37 | 17 |
| > In situations like this, does the captain of the vessel have to pay the
> USCG for its services?
No, the coast guard doesn't charge for search and rescue. It's probably not a
good idea for them to charge for this, since it would provide a powerful
disincentive to call the CG when you're in trouble, and cause you to delay
your call much longer than you should.
Over the past three years, we paid for some of this stuff through "user fees".
Even without user fees, I think it's fair to say that most boat owners are
in the middle and upper tax brackets, and contribute quite substantially to
government operations, including the Coast Guard. I like the idea that they'll
be there for me when I need it, and I don't mind paying for them to rescue
various nut cases in the mean time. After all, if and when they do pick
me up, it'll likely be because I did something stupid or foolhardy!
--RS
|
1779.12 | Risk | SALEM::GILMAN | | Wed Dec 15 1993 08:51 | 9 |
| Anybody going out in a boat (especially offshore) has IMO a moral
responsibility to equip the boat and conduct themselves (good
seamanship) in a manner which makes the need for a rescue as unlikely
as possible. One should head out to sea with an independent frame
of mind. That is, plan as if rescue services didn't exist. Its
immoral to expect others to risk their lives saving your butt because
you didn't plan well.
Jeff
|
1779.13 | Gee, Jeff, we pretty much agree on this one! | DKAS::JOHNHC | | Wed Dec 15 1993 11:19 | 1 |
|
|
1779.14 | Smile | SALEM::GILMAN | | Wed Dec 15 1993 15:06 | 7 |
| Did I miss something John? Do you have an earlier entry that says the
same thing? If so, and I missed it sorry for being redundant. Oh
yeah, sometime back there I think I do remember your saying that.
Well, I am certainly glad we agree John. Smile
Jeff
|
1779.15 | | GLDOA::ROGERS | I'm the NRA | Thu Dec 16 1993 12:11 | 7 |
| Great Idea....but what about the whales?
How do you prepare for an amorous humpback?
Not go?
Even when you do everything right it can go wrong.
|
1779.16 | Whales | SALEM::GILMAN | | Thu Dec 16 1993 14:09 | 8 |
| Whales etc.... I suppose its like anything in life. Life is risky and
when on the ocean the risks are increased. So, you prepare for any
reasonable contingency (whales aren't one of them) and take your
chances. Or maybe you could do something to make the underbody of
your boat less sexually attractive to whales? Maybe a retracting
propeller? Smile
Jeff
|
1779.17 | E_Z_4_U | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Fri Dec 17 1993 11:26 | 14 |
|
YeahbutYeahbut... I've sailed thru whales in the Stellwagen Bank
and was nowhere NEAR as nervous as I get on Rte.128 (or fill in your
favorite road here).
Statistics would probably agree.
I think the rathole here is a supressed frustration at having to go
to work every day and not having the time and $$$ it takes for a
transatlatic. I have a book of crossings in small boats- one guy I'll
put in the nut category was a german doctor- he survived a crossing in
a canoe, so he repeated it in an inflatable!
My point being, Monday armchair quarterbacking with a brewski in
hand is easy, and of little value to those who really play.
Dr. 2� Freud.
|
1779.18 | | OTOOA::MOWBRAY | This isn't a job its an Adventure | Mon Dec 20 1993 07:36 | 7 |
| For the (if only partially serious) question about Whales, we often
turn on our depth sounder when near them in order to warn them that
someone with a different sound is nearby. I am not aware that the
sound is particularly aphrodisiac though so I run that risk.
I believe though that the depth sounder thing works well as a humpback
did a big dive right off the bow one time when I turned it on.
|
1779.19 | | GLDOA::ROGERS | I'm the NRA | Mon Dec 20 1993 17:40 | 7 |
| Partially serious, but in 1990 and especially in 1989, there seemed to
be a significant number of trans ocean racers and cruisers that
sustained substantial damage from being "rubbed" but a whale.
memory only at work here. maybe there is a way to query some database
somewhere and find out just how much of problem one can expect.
|