T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
999.1 | description ??? | CGVAX2::CLARK_J | | Fri Sep 30 1988 16:22 | 2 |
| please descibe a flying scot.
|
999.2 | I enjoyed the ones I sailed | STAR::KENNEY | | Fri Sep 30 1988 18:24 | 15 |
| I used to sail a flying Scott (sp?) a couple of years back. The ones I
used were not tuned for racing but were part of a sailing school and
rental fleet. The boat was comfortable not, alot of fititing and
rigging to trip over. They were stable and would forgive a pretty
major mistake without sending you into the drink. Come to think of it
I would have hated to tip one over righting it would have been a bitch.
The boat was good in moderate air but I would give it a pass in really
light stuff. Also I nick named them flying squats they tend to pound
when working to windward in anything but flat calm. All in all a
reasonable boat to live with. I would not buy one but I want something
with a higher performance.
Forrest
|
999.3 | And in a Jovial Mood.... | AKOV11::KALINOWSKI | | Mon Oct 03 1988 13:56 | 9 |
| >>> Re .1 describe a Flying Scot Sailor
That's Bill Robinson on his old Hobie 16. Evidently Bill had
pushed the Cat past it's capacities when he attached his Scotish
flag to the top of the mast. He was double trapped when the windward
shroud let go. Heard he flew at least 30 feet when the mast decided
to use him as a human fish lure. 8<) 8<)
|
999.4 | | GONAVY::GINGER | | Mon Oct 03 1988 16:52 | 13 |
| .2 is mostly correct about Flying Scotts. I believe they are a 'family
version' of a Lightning. Like the lightning they are 19' long, sailed
by a crew of 3. They are a round section hull, rather than the
Lightnings hard chine. They are heavier and slower than a Lightning.
Most important difference is that the Flying Scott is only manufactured
by one company, in Ohio I think, whereas the Lightning is a class
boat built by many builders.
If all this sounds like an ad for a Lighnting I do still have one
for sale :-)
|
999.5 | .-1 close but not quite right | STAR::KENNEY | | Mon Oct 03 1988 19:16 | 16 |
| The Flying Scott North American championships were won by a husband
and wife team from MD. Again my only complaint with the boat was
that it was not a hot enough for me.
RE: .-1 I know of two builders one in Maryland and on in UTAH.
Specs:
LOA 19'
Beam 6"9"
Draft 8" to 48"
SA 191 sq ft
Spinaker 200 sq ft
Forrest
|
999.6 | Portsmouth Ratings | CSSE32::BLAISDELL | | Tue Oct 04 1988 12:59 | 12 |
| re .4
:
Lightnings hard chine. They are heavier and slower than a Lightning.
:
1986 Portsmouth numbers would indicate that there is not much speed difference
between Lightnings and Flying Scots. The Lightning was rated at 89.6 and the
Flying Scot at 90.4.
- Bob
|
999.7 | Flying Scot trends | CSSE32::BLAISDELL | | Tue Oct 04 1988 13:15 | 9 |
| re .0
The Flying Scot was mentioned in a recent AMERICAN SAILOR (USYRU magazine) as
one of a very few one design dinghies that was enjoying strong growth in
members and new boats. This would seem to be a good sign in terms of
protecting your investment in the boat.
- Bob
|
999.8 | Harwichport fleet | CAM2::DAMON | | Tue Oct 04 1988 13:31 | 9 |
| There's a racing fleet of Flying Scots at the Stone Horse Yacht
Club, Harwichport, Mass. in case you want to watch them in action
during the summer or need a place to write.
I raced on them there on and off for a few years and found them fun
in the "Smokey Sou'westers" that prevailed.
Pete
|
999.9 | I owned one and liked it | BTO::HICKSON_B | | Thu Oct 06 1988 23:15 | 57 |
| The Flying Scot was the first sailboat I owned and the boat I mostly
learned on. I sailed mine on Lake Champlain for three years before
buying a larger keel boat.
The Scot is a very easy boat to sail due to it's simplicity. The main
is significantly larger than the jib making sail handling relatively
light work. There are almost no go-fasts (hiking straps, rig
adjustments, etc.) It was designed to be sailed and raced by a family
(including Grandparents and young children). Because of this some
sacrifices in speed were made. I too found it slower than Lightnings
but it can also provide an exciting day of sailing in moderate wind and
above. It's faster than many day sailors of comparable size. It is
realtively beamy and will plane in moderate to strong winds.
To give you an idea of the simplicty:
no backstay - shrouds are aft enogh to support mast
no spinnaker downhaul - guy led under hook on chainplate
no hiking straps or trapeze
no mast bend mechanism
no traveler
only three sails
no hanks on jib or foil, jib supported by luff wire
jib halyard adjusts forestay tension
The only controls were the sheets, halyards, centerboard, outhaul,
cunningham(?), jib leads, and vang (?). The question marks are because
I'm not sure about these, they may have been absent (it been 10
years).
The stability of the boat is impressive for it's size. It's very
hard to flip. If it does flip it shouldn't swamp because the cockpit
is out of the water, only the deck and seats are in the water. It
shouldn't be to hard to right unless you turtle it.
The cockpit is enormous with full length seats. You can easily take
more than three people out and still be comfortable. If you don't
race you might not notice the difference in speed between the Scot
and the Lightening but if you spend any length of time on it you
will definitely notice the difference in comfort.
The class is relatively active across the country and seems to be
getting stronger in the last few years. I raced the boat for only one
year in mid-week races because there was no class on the lake. There
were a number of Scots around but they didn't race. I had no problem
selling mine.
I had a lot of fun, made all kinds of mistakes without hurting myself
or the boat and learned that sailing was one of the nicest ways
to spend time around. I finally sold the boat when I got more serious
about racing and overnight cruising.
Assuming that you have settled on a boat in the 19 foot range I
give the Scott high marks unless you are seriously into
performance/racing.
Bill
|
999.10 | I remembered a couple more things | BTO::HICKSON_B | | Thu Oct 06 1988 23:50 | 9 |
| The Scot doesn't have a vang. The main reefs by rolling up on the
boom so there's no place to attach the vang.
One of the main performance differences between the Scot and Lightning
is the Lightning's greater pointing ability because of more elaborite
sail and rig controls.
Bill
|
999.11 | They have added some... | CVG::MONTIVIRDI | | Fri Oct 07 1988 14:11 | 8 |
| Re .9,.10
According to the info that I brought back from the Newport
Boat Show, the Scot does indeed have a vang and you can also
get Jiffy reefing. We had a larger Cape Dory but with my
oldest getting ready for college and two more right behind
her, we thought it best to go something a little more affordable.
|
999.12 | A Nice Daysailer/Racer | DYO780::SORRELS | | Mon Oct 31 1988 12:51 | 22 |
| The lake I sail on (Cowan Lake, in Southwest Ohio) has a large and
very active Flying Scot fleet. The people I have talked to really
enjoy sailing them very much. It seems to be a great combination
boat for family daysailing and racing. The cockpit is huge and
would hold 6 - 8 adults.
The boat was designed by Gordon "Sandy" Douglass who also designed
the Thistle and Highlander one-designs. I'm sure there are a good
number of used ones available, even though in Ohio where this is
a popular boat, you don't find many in the classified ads.
On the east coast they are manufactured by Gordon Douglass Boat
Co. in Maryland (Rockville I think). The president is Eric
Ammann. They are also made in Utah by Westscot Mfg. If you
check SAIL magazine, they run an ad about every other month or
so. They pride themselves on quality and service.
I almost bought one this spring when upgrading from a Capri 14.2,
but went with a CAL 21 for the cabin, head, etc. If I was in the
market for a large daysailer, the FS would be at the top of my
list.
|
999.13 | Flying Jr.-what's it worth?? | AKOCOA::SELIG | | Fri Apr 26 1991 15:31 | 17 |
| Can anybody provide an "estimated" fair market price for:
1980 14'-Flying (Scot) Jr
w/ trailer.
Everything is in good (not excellent) condition; some hairline
cracking in the interior Gel-Coat. No apparrent structural defects/
damage. Mast and fitting are all there and in good condition. Main/Jib
sails are original but in very good shape. The seller is asking $950
but has indicated some flexibility.
Thx,
Jonathan
|
999.14 | Current Flying Scot Info - Looking to Buy | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Wed Aug 04 1993 17:03 | 10 |
| I'm thinking of buying a Flying Scot, and was hoping that my fellow noters
might be able to help me.
If you know of anyone who is selling one, please let me know.
If you have stories to sharem please do.
Hurry, before they shut down the notefiles! 8^)
Bob
|
999.15 | WANTED: Used Flying Scot | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Fri Aug 06 1993 17:05 | 8 |
|
WANTED: Used Flying Scot
Send info to SYORPD::DEEP
or call DTN 256-5708
or (315) 453-5708
Thanks... Bob
|