T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
743.1 | how much?? | STUD::HEUSS | Forward into the past | Tue Feb 09 1988 10:06 | 3 |
| If you don't mind my asking, what did they set you back???
|
743.2 | They are expensive, but worth it | TILLER::SEARS | Paul Sears, SHR1-4/D27, 237-3783 | Tue Feb 09 1988 13:14 | 11 |
| I can't speak for .0, but mine set me back $90 (in 1982). And i got the frames
at wholesale from my brother (who sells them)!
They are the neatest thing since rum, even at that cost. They cut through glare
while not making the world dark, or orange, or pink, or, ... In negotiating
shoals they are as valuable as a depthsounder. One should not even try the
Bahamas w/o polarized sunglasses, and if you haved a prescription already, the
combo produce clear and non-glaring visible underwater features.
I recently lost mine. I guess i'll be out some $ soon...
|
743.3 | reply to .1 - cost | MOTHER::BLAISDELL | | Wed Feb 10 1988 07:54 | 13 |
| re .1
> If you don't mind my asking, what did they set you back???
I checked my receipt last night and the total was $132 for lenses and frames.
Unfortunately the receipt did not list lense and frame prices separately.
As best as I can remember, the polarized lenses were $20 more than tinted
glasses. After a year's experience with the polarized sunglasses, my opinion
is $112 ($132 - $20) for tinted sunglasses would have been a total waste.
- Bob
|
743.4 | How about contacts and Sunglasses | AKOV11::KALINOWSKI | | Wed Feb 10 1988 12:44 | 12 |
| I use long wearing (i.e. 30 day) weighted contact lens with whatever
sunglasses i perfer. It costs more (appx $350 with good sunglasses),
but this way I don't have to switch glasses when it becomes dark.
This is the way to go on the ocean since the salt water doesn't
affect the contacts, and If I lose the glasses (did this once trying
to drown myself on a windsurfer), I still have my vision. In addition,
I am not limited to the frame style or lens coatings.
|
743.5 | polorizer for camera too!!!!! | THEPOD::PEASE_DAVE | I said Id have to think about it | Wed Feb 10 1988 14:54 | 8 |
|
If your a photo bug, the first filter to buy after the UV is a
poloizer. I run with 2 pair. 1 yellowish prescription with UV protection,
(the yellow was unexpected due to the UV) and 1 pair of polorized prescrition
sun glasses for driving and anything outside. Well worth it!!!!!!
|
743.6 | Another Vote For contact Lens | ODIHAM::GOUGH | Pete Gough | Thu Feb 11 1988 11:38 | 14 |
| I have been cruising with both contact lens plus Polaroid sun glasses
and with glasses with a built in filter. In rain or rough seas the
contacts plus sun glasses are far superior to the prescription glasses.
(It rains a lot over here in UK.....) I keep 2 pairs of sun glasses
on board and thus always have one clean dry pair available for
situations where clarity of vision is critical. Contact Lens have
improved my sailing enjoyment. End of Commercial.......
I have a friend who is an eye surgeon who converted me to contact
lens because of my sailing interests and have been supplying him
with Gin ever since as he won't let me forget who introduced me
to the lens.
Pete
|
743.7 | See the sea. | SLUGER::KREBS | | Tue Feb 16 1988 16:54 | 13 |
|
I own a boat with another woman who wears glasses sometimes, and
contacts other times. The problem with contacts and sailing--if
one goes on an overnight (or longer) cruise with contacts--cleaning
them becomes a problem, when the boat is at anchor or on a mooring
and there's no a.c. around--you can't plug in the little steam machine.
An alternative is prescription Vuarnet Nautilux sunglasses which
are specially designed for use on the water. Practical Sailor
recommends them highly as protection against an eye disease (I forget
the name) that sailors are susceptible to. I have non-prescription
Nautiluxes and I love them. Mine cost 55 dollars four years ago.
Prescriptions were about twice that price.
|
743.8 | Still voting for lens's | ODIHAM::GOUGH | Pete Gough - UK | Wed Feb 17 1988 03:03 | 11 |
| I will come clean......My lens are gas permeable hard lens that
require cleaning in chemical and fresh water only. On passages
overnight say typically from Chichester to the Channel Islands (20
Hours) I wear my normal prescription lens. The rest of the time
I stick to my lens. I should say that on any cruise I carry 2 pairs
of prescription glasses ,2 sets of contact lens, 2 ordinary pairs
of sunglasses............needless to say I cannot see much without
some artificial help.....
Pete
|
743.9 | Where there's a will there's a way! | FIDDLE::CORKUM | | Mon Feb 22 1988 13:22 | 16 |
| I've been wearing contact lenses (soft) for as long as I've been
sailing - 14 years and have had no problem in keeping them clean/sterilized.
I clean them with the prescribed solutions as usual and then drop
the case into a pot of boiling water for 10 minutes (another use for that
count-down timer). Then I turn off the heat and leave the case
in the pot until morning. This is just as good as using the electric
heating units.
So, if you can boil water (use Sterno if you have to) then you can
keep your lenses clean.
bc
|
743.10 | My Ultimate Sunglasses | EXPERT::SPENCER | | Mon Feb 29 1988 12:20 | 21 |
| For those of us fortunate or unfortunate to be astigmatic without
requiring any other correction, contact lenses aren't a good solution.
About ten years ago, an optician friend of mine in Key West created the
Ultimate Sunglasses for me, and they're easily worth $200 or more to me (I
paid much less then for them, though.)
They are laminated with the highest grade polarizing filter available, but
instead of glass he used B&L dark brown blanks, the darkest shade
available. He then put the brown blanks in an amber color solution
for a day or so. (FYI -- The way they tint plastic lenses is by
immersing them in a color solution -- the longer, the darker. Varied
shading is created by pulling the lens out of solution a wee bit at a
time; the overall darkest tint used to take 4-12 hr depnding on the
color.)
Thus were created a perfect combination of overall blocking (85%
reduction from the B&L dark brown), blue filtering (amber tinting) and
glare blocking (polarizing layer). I recommend them without reservation.
John.
|
743.11 | Do they block UV light? | VAXWRK::ALINSKAS | | Mon Feb 29 1988 13:18 | 14 |
| Does polarizing glass block out Ultra-violet? If it doesn't, watch out!
From what I understand UV light can permanently damage your eyes. Its not how
dark your sunglasses are that's important. Cheap sunglasses, for example,
do not filter UV light. So the darker the shade the more your iris opens and
the more susceptible your eyes are to UV damage.
I have perscription sunglasses that I use out on the water. They have the same
coating that Varnet (sp?) uses in their sunglasses. It sounds like what was
described in -.? above. They block out UV, and the blue spectrum. They have an
amber tint. The eye does not focus blue light well so you loose resolution then.
They also go under the name Blue-blocker. Anyway, they work great...
|
743.12 | I wanta go sailing, when's the ice melting? | AKOV11::KALINOWSKI | | Wed Mar 02 1988 18:51 | 25 |
| Re: .10 Good news for you John, my contacts are formed to correct
my stigmatisims. They are weighted to keep them in place, and they
are extended wear to allow me to keep them in for 30 days at a time.
Wearing them on a catamaran means taking them out and rising them
at the end of a day since the salt that gets behind the glasses
onto my eyes makes them stick a bit. I have left them in overnight
, but i need to squirt a bit of saline into my eyes in the morning
unless i am having onions for breakfeast. That's why they cost 325
bucks and normal contacts go 65.
As for tints, thats what they do, tint the world. You have to make
sure you get polrizied filter glass used. Without them you will
have a lot tougher time picking up the wind shifts on the water
on a sunny day. My wife used to work at
a company that designed spectum analyzers and other optical measuring
equipment for NASA. For a joke they tested a bunch of sunglasses
to see who had the best UV test. Contrary to the tests in the
magazines, the Varniets (sp?) did the job, but not as well
as some others that cost a good deal less. From what I remember
the Bolle (sp?) were the best for the money as they blocked everything
and cost about 25-30 dollars.
john
|
743.13 | Out Of Sight | VBV01::HJOHNSON | | Wed Aug 03 1988 22:28 | 15 |
| Well I read all the data and decided to get some new glasses.
My eyes had not changed in four years so the perscription remained
the same. But the power of NOTES prevailed and I ordered a new
pair of sunglasses with dark, 98%UV and polarized lenses.
I learned that polarized lenses and LCD displays do not mix well.
My depth guage was ok, but the knotmeter was not readable unless
I moved my head or raised the glasses. My watch on occasion was
difficult to read. Think about how LCD's work and it makes perfect
sense.
On The Bay, they are great. I will put up with the extra effort
to read the speed (I'm a cruiser anyway).
|