T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
366.1 | My $0.02 worth | PUNDIT::MCWILLIAMS | | Mon Jul 21 1986 10:02 | 66 |
| Chris;
Well here is my $0.02 worth ....
I would tend to avoid the Venture/MacGregor like the plague. The boat
is built fairly inexpensively as both the retail and resale prices
indicate (i.e. you get what you pay for). A witty friend of mine
claims it is the only boat that you can get a suntan when lying on one
of the bunks (i.e. the boat tends to be somewhat translucent). It
might make a nice lake boat but I would be leery of how well it could
take the Atlantic. Some of the details such as through bolting the
chain plates instead of embedding the chain plates in reinforced FRP
gives one some cause for unease. In general the finish work is
pretty lousy.
The J-22 is a fairly nice constructed boat as the resale prices
indicate. It makes a nice racer if that is your goal, but its
accommodations are Spartan to say the least. It would probably have
the best resale value of the 4 you mentioned. I believe there are
also several J boat associations available.
The Catalina is of medium construction and features a "pop-top"
which will extend the head room if you want to stay overnight on
it, but the "pop-top" shouldn't be deployed while under sail.
The O'Day 22 I am not familiar with, although I am familiar with
the O'Day 25. Again I would choose a Catalina over an O'Day because
of the integrity of construction.
Another boat to put under consideration would be the Hunter 23,
but again it is a cheaply made boat.
Questions I would pose are;
a. Are you looking for a trailerable ? If you plan to sail in
the New Hampshire coastal area, the non-availablity of moorings
would require you to trailer. The O'Day I believe in its swing
keel configuration takes very little draft which would be
convenient to load and unload.
b. Are you looking only for day sailing or do you plan to try
cruising ? If you are racing and daysailing only, then the
J-22 is the best choice, if you want to stay overnight on
the boat, the Catalina is the better choice.
c. How much do you wish to spend ?
d. Do you want to buy new or used ?
e. If you are looking for used where are you looking ? Good places
to get listing are; the Boston Globe, the Want Advertiser,
and Offshore magazine (in ascending order of desirability).
Understand that most of prices quoted are asking prices and
can be negotiated down. Send mail to John Rodenhiser (NECVAX::)
and if he still has his BUC used price book, he can give you
some idea of the "official" prices.
I hope I haven't been depressing on boat quality, but most 22 footers
are not designed to take the ocean when it gets rough. Since I
like to cruise, this is a prime interest with me. If you plan to
only daysail and race it probably isn't with you.
/jim
Owner of 25 foot Northern
|
366.2 | | GRAMPS::WCLARK | Walt Clark | Mon Jul 21 1986 10:17 | 17 |
| Taking any light 22' sailer ocean sailing is risky. I would not
leave the dock on a Venture, or the bay/harbor on a Catalina or
small O'Day. J have always been very well built considering their
D/L and the bigger ones have proven themselves in bad weather.
I guess I would question your intended use more closely, since all
the above will fit into some kind of sailing.
The things to ask yourself are: 1) what kind of sailing will you
do most (club racing or coastal cruising), 2) what are the waters
like most of the time (smooth bays with light air, or offshore),
and what kind of investment do you want to make. If your choices
were the result of this process already, I would leave you with:
Pick the J.
Walt
|
366.3 | Yeah but,,,whats it cost????? | USMRW6::RNICOLAZZO | Without Chemicals, life itself would be impossible | Mon Jul 21 1986 11:44 | 18 |
| At the risk of making some enemies here, i'm going to give you
my view of the replies you'll get here. Don't be decieved by the
"If your going to drive, it HAS to be a Porche" additude. In the
harbor i'm moored in, there are PLENTY of smaller Macgregors,
Catalinas, O'Days, ect. and the owners (including myself) go
out, sail these boats and have a great time!!!!!
You are probably not into anything too heavyduty (just guessing
by the fact that you're sailing with two young kids) so i would
suggest buying the best boat you can for the money you can spend,
than understand that boats limitations and sail it accordingly.
Sure a J boat is better then an O'day or Catalina (at TWICE the
price, i think) and an O'Day or Catalina is better built then a
MacGregor (again at TWICE the price).
The moral of the story is, A Sunday drive would be a lot more fun
in a BMW but don't stay home because all you can afford is a Ford
Escort. Buy what you can afford, use it safely, and have a GREAT
TIME!!!!!!
|
366.4 | not a good analogy | RDF::RDF | Rick Fricchione | Mon Jul 21 1986 12:58 | 15 |
| I can agree with .-1 to a point. Theres no need to buy a BMW if
you only go out for a Sunday drive. You can get away with less.
Unfortunately, from what I have seen of MacGregor, you get a Chevette
at something like Nova prices, while with a J, Catalina or O'Day
you get a Camaro for Camaro prices.
Price isn't everything. Look at the boat. Thats all people are
saying here. If there is a $5000.00 difference in cost, find out
why. You may have to temper your sailing habits with that knowledge
later on. Like the difference between sailing in and around a harbor
entrance vs sailing from one harbor to another in open ocean.
Rick
|
366.5 | another $0.02 worth | PULSAR::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Jul 21 1986 13:21 | 16 |
| Given the reputed sorry state of the used boat market (ie, low selling
prices and nothing much selling), I'd suggest expanding your list of
boats a bit. There are a number of other boats available for similar
prices that are worth looking at and offer more room for four. For
example, the C&C 24 and 25 and the J-24. There are lots of these around,
and many are old enough now that the selling price might be lower than a
smaller, newer boat. If you're willing to forego racing, then older
Pearsons, etc, are possiblities.
Unrelated observation: We passed through the tailenders in a PHRF race
yesterday. Crikey, even the back-of-the-fleet boats are using mylar and
other high tech sails. It appears that cheap racing is an era past.
Alan
|
366.6 | My two cents. | NECVAX::RODENHISER | | Mon Jul 21 1986 14:45 | 22 |
| I was going to stay out of this one after I saw the first couple
of answers. I concur with the feeling about MacGregor's and wouldn't
leave the dock in one either. At least not a salt water dock.
But I've got to respond to .3:
Nobody's saying that you've got to buy the Porsche or BMW all the
time. What they are saying is that the ocean (and some large lakes)
can be a very unpredictable and unforgiving place to be at times.
If you're going out there then you better have a safe boat.
You really did come to the same conclusion but it needs to be
emphasized. You buy the best equipment you can afford, you develop
the experience to handle it safely, and you don't over extend the
capabilities of either.
It's strictly a personal opinion (backed up by an awful lot of
supporters) but a prudent person would not make a habit of sailing
Ventures off the New England coast.
John
|
366.7 | Now i'm going to hear it!!!! | USMRW6::RNICOLAZZO | Without Chemicals, life itself would be impossible | Mon Jul 21 1986 15:57 | 14 |
| The Prudent person also would not make a habit of sailing off the
New England coast in a light 22' boat with 5 and 7 year old children
on board either. This leads me to believe that is not the intended
type of sailing this person is looking for.
I am by no means recommending a Venture to this person but rather
I am attempting to answer the other half of his question. "Would
anyone care to comment on the relative merits of these boats, including
'bang for the buck'".
P.S. As for "not leaving the dock on a Venture". If i only had
<$5000 to spend, i'de buy one and have some fun Sunday afternoons!!!!
|
366.8 | | NECVAX::RODENHISER | | Mon Jul 21 1986 18:05 | 26 |
| Generally I tend to keep my mouth shut when it comes to criticism
of specific boats. At least when it's to a wide audience. It too
easy to hurt somebody's feelings. I'm sorry if I have stepped on
any toes with the Venture criticism. With respect to .3 and .6, I
realize that you have purchased a boat from Havencraft and they were
a MacGregor dealer. I don't mean to attack your boat if that's what
you own.
But.....
Your response in .3 was to ASSUME that people would knock this boat.
I just did some checking in BUC and your view that Catalina and
O'Day were twice as expensive as Venture and that J-22's would be
four times as expensive doesn't hold water - so to speak. Maybe
they are if you're looking at new prices, I don't have any data
one way or the other. But the price range for used boats falls
between $5K and $8K for all of them.
Somebody's Sunday afternoon fun could be someone else's foolishness.
I won't pass judgement. I've seen Hobie's and windsurfers out in
the middle of Buzzard's Bay on Sunday afternoons when it was blowing
30 knots. They appeared to be having 'fun'. I was wishing them good
luck and saying a silent prayer.
John
|
366.9 | I knew i get it!! | USMRW6::RNICOLAZZO | Without Chemicals, life itself would be impossible | Mon Jul 21 1986 22:32 | 25 |
| Don't worry about my toes, I did what i had to, to get on the
water and am having the time of my life. I more then anybody understand
the limitations of the Venture and for that reason did not and would
not recommend it. My point was (and is) only to bring $$$$$ into
the picture along with quality.
Now to the price...I'm seem to be hearing some very contradicting
messages. Yes, i was refering to NEW price which goes pretty much
as i pointed out in .3 (again the J boat i'm only guessing but i
bet i'm not too far off). Now for some simple math...If the Catalina
and O'Day cost new twice the price and the Venture, due to poorer
quality depreciate faster, how do thay end up the same price???
I'm sorry if i sound sarcastic here (don't really mean to be) but
whatever you read in a book is DEAD wrong. If i could have found
an O'Day or Catalina for $5 to $8K, i'de be sailing one now!!!
From what i saw after months of looking (this past winter) both
those boat averaged around $10K.
P.S. My last boat was an O'Day and i loved it. My current boat
would have been a Catalina if i could have pulled it off!!!
P.P.S. I also own a 16' Hobie which i will be sailing in Buzzards
Bay this weekend. Any chance you'll save one of those prayers for
me????????????
|
366.10 | SOME J-22 FACTS | CURIE::DONOHUE | | Tue Jul 22 1986 08:55 | 43 |
| I bought a new J-22 in 1983. I had sailed about 13 years prior
to that but was really a beginer again. I bought the boat from
Lawson Yachts in Hingham. Sam Lawson delivered the boat with mme,
went racing with me and taught me most of what I know about sailing.
The boat was a very pleasent and positive experience.
I paid $12,500 for the boat with just about every option except
a spinnaker. This included a trailor and an outboard. I traded
the boat in on a C&C 27 and got back $500 more than I paid for it.
I understand that the "trade-in" or "cash in hand" situation but
this was more convenient for me. I had made some additions to the
boat so, I felt that it was a fair deal. The dealer Sailboats
Northeast moved the boat very quickly. So, there is a market for
the boat.
Some general comments:
* You get what you pay for. The boat is heavily rigged for its
size and extremely well made. It is a strong boat.
* I have gone from Quincy to Provincetwon in it with a good crew.
Accomodations are poor, but this is not what you buy one for.
* there are all kinds of sail controls. After using them you will
want them on any boat you sail.
* The boat is tender but she is really fast.
* Boat sails very well on just the main. However, I would recommend
a small storm jib be carried.
* The boat has extremely light helm and will go hard to weather
with only one finger on the helm.
* like all J's she points extremely high.
Why didn't I buy another J-boat. My oldest son wanted another.
However, my wife, who is not a sialor, felt that it was too small,
and too tippy.
If you would like to talk more about a J-22 I am on DTN 297-5023.
|
366.11 | How 'bout a Typhoon? | SUMMIT::THOMAS | Ed Thomas | Tue Jul 22 1986 09:47 | 34 |
| My $.17 worth...
re .9
> whatever you read in a book is DEAD wrong. If i could have found
John's "book" is in fact the book yacht sales types use in determining
the value of a boat and I believe he has the current issue so his
information seems fairly lively to me.
Personally, I take humbrage at being referred to as a BMW or Porsche
type. My values are much more 1/2 ton pickup. :<)
Back to the original topic...
Based on your sailing area (I'm guessing you'd go as far as the
Annisquam or Cape Porpoise/Kennebunkport but the majority of time you'd
be off Portsmouth - all of which is Gulf of Maine stuff) and the ages
of your children, I'd recommend that you look at a heavier boat that's
not going to get bounced around as much.
The Cape Dory Typhoon falls in your price range, I think. Friends of
ours have one and are very happy with it. They're both over 6' and have
three kids and when asked about being crowded they say that it's never
been a problem. You can put a head on it and sleep 4. But the best
thing about the Typhoon is that they sail very well. She won't point
with a fin keel or centerboard boat, but you'll get a smoother motion
and she's not anywhere near as tender as the boats you've mentioned.
Cape Dory 22 and Sea Sprite 23 are larger versions of the Typhoon
with similar capabilities.
Ed
|
366.12 | "Need Innnput" said Number 5 | GRAMPS::WCLARK | Walt Clark | Tue Jul 22 1986 10:22 | 12 |
| Well Chris, I guess you noticed one of your choices struck a nerve.
I would still like to hear more about what kind of sailing you plan
to do (racing in one-design class, weekend cruising, mix of both
- % of each).
Both Typhoons and J-22s are excellent boats but they are at opposite
ends of the sailing spectrum, so the recommendations will likely
be very mixed untill the 'usage' assumptions are clear.
Walt
|
366.13 | Micor-budget mariners | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | | Tue Jul 22 1986 10:53 | 21 |
| My experience of solo cruising along the coast of Maine, living
aboard a 12' Firefly class racing sloop may label me as an extremist,
but I'm not convinced that bigger is better. There are a lot of
22' and smaller boats that can give you a lot of pleasure daysailing
and weekends and I would recommend you find a copy of a book I saw
last night in the Acton Library:
Sailing on a Micro-budget
by Larry Brown
Seven Seas Press
524 Thames Street
Newport, Rhode Island
02840
Price $14.95
One boat shown in this book that appealed to me was a catboat called
a Marshall Sanderling by Marshall Marine in South Dartmouth, Mass.
Does anybody know anything about these?
|
366.14 | | TLE::NOLAN | | Tue Jul 22 1986 12:50 | 34 |
|
Since a number of people have mentioned the choice depends on
what type of sailing one intends to do and, of course, on the budget
I had better give some background.
By far the majority of my sailing will be cruising, and the
greater majority of that, day sailing. I would like to be able
to do overnight cruises too. I really enjoy racing, but would be
happy to crew for someone else if that is appropriate, as opposed
to buying a 'racing' boat. (In fact, if any one needs racing crew,
call me ANYTIME!)
I need a boat that is easy to sail. My wife is has very little
sailing exprience (but I have access to other crew), so I need a
boat on which she can learn more. I have sailed Catalina-22's on
lakesand like the way they sail. I would have to say that my primary
requirement in a boat is stability.
The main reason for listing the boats that I did, was expense.
I am limited to around $10K, though have no problem with a used
boat. I have seen a number of 22 ft boats, fairly well equipped
within the price range, but most boats longer than 22 ft seem to
be much more expensive. I would welcome the chance to get a 24
or 25 ft boat but they are rare given the price I can afford. I
am leaning towards a Catalina 22, but like the looks of the J boats
though they are more pricy.
Thanks to all for their comments so far. I really appreciate
the comments on the Venture 22 - they mostly confirmed my own
suspicions!
chris.
|
366.15 | Prices. | NECVAX::RODENHISER | | Tue Jul 22 1986 14:10 | 22 |
| Part of the confusion about pricing, depreciation, etc. is due to
my lumping of a bunch of different models and years together.
Also, these prices included bottom of the line from one mfg and
top of the line of another. For example J-22's don't show up UNTIL
1984 and Ventures don't show up AFTER 1983.
Also any prices I quote are without engine and/or trailer since
you have to go to another part of the book for that stuff.
I don't know a lot about these 22 footers but from what I can see
in BUC you've got to be very careful with models AND model year.
For example O'Day built just the O'Day 22 through '82, in '83 they
had both the O'day 22 and the O'day 222, in '84 the 22 went away.
The Venture was a Venture 222 in '78, became the Venture 22 in '79,
and the MacGregor 22 in '83.
Interesting that several responses seem to hold the Catalina in
higher esteem than the O'Day. Is it because Catalina gives you
more boat for the money? Again, BUC shows O'day to be more expensive
than Catalina (and even J-22's).
John
|
366.16 | Catalina vs. O'Day | USMRW6::RNICOLAZZO | Without Chemicals, life itself would be impossible | Tue Jul 22 1986 17:09 | 12 |
| When i was in the market, and looking at Catalina's and O'Day's
i thought the Catalina to be a much more comfortable boat ie. cabin.
And for the money difference, my uneducated eye couldn't see any
difference in quality.
I've known people who (including myself) owned older O'day models
and were very pleased with what they got for the money. But, i've
asked a few people about the cost of thier new O'day's and i seem
to get "too much" for an answer. Not a very scientific study, but...
I've been on Catalina's, from the 22 through the 38 and each one
really impressed me for the use of space and accommodations.
Needless to say, I want a Catalina 30!!!!!
|
366.17 | Catalina believes in class standards | CSSE32::BLAISDELL | | Tue Jul 22 1986 18:25 | 20 |
| Re: .15 Catalina vs O'Day
I don't think there is much difference in price or quality, but respect for
class standards put Catalina and O'Day in different worlds.
As you point out, O'Day has stopped making the 22 and is making a 222. They
also stopped making the Mariner and now make a 192. A few years ago they
stopped making the DS I and introduced the DS II. Last year they dropped the
DS II and now make a O'Day 17 (see my note 365.6). I'm sure there are other
examples.
By contrast, C22s made 15 years ago are competitive with boats made today.
Certain improvements have been made over the years, primarily in space
utilization, but it is still the same sailboat. In this size class, class
standards protect your investment and I want that protection.
I'm a Catalina 22 owner.
- Bob
|
366.18 | Some examples of current prices | PUNDIT::MCWILLIAMS | | Wed Jul 23 1986 09:42 | 64 |
| Here are some of the sailboat listing from this week's Want ADvetiser
for sailboats with asking prices below $10K. As one notices there
is a wide variation in price for even the same model. This can
be explained by the equipment that comes with it and how many illegal
chemicals the owners took prior to running the ad;
Aquarius 23' ( ?? ) $7900
Aquarius 23' ( ?? ) $8500
Aquarius 23' (1974) $4400
Bristol 22' ( ?? ) $7900
Bristol 22' (1971) $7900
Bristol 22' (1974) $9500
Bristol 24' (1969) $9000
Catalina 22' (1980) $7500
Catalina 22' (1981) $9250
Catalina 22' (1982) $7000
Catalina 22' (1982) $9300
Chrysler 22' (1976) $6000
Columbia 22' ( ?? ) $4000
Columbia 22' ( ?? ) $5500
Coronado 23' ( ?? ) $7300
Essex 26' (1975) $9000
Hunter 22' (1981) $8900
Hunter 25' (1976) $9000
Kells 22' ( ?? ) $7000
Kells 23' ( ?? ) $4500
Kells 23' ( ?? ) $4500
Kells 23' ( ?? ) $4850
Kells 23' (1973) $4500
MacGregor 22' ( ?? ) $7200
MacGregor 22' (1980) $6000
MacGregor 24' ( ?? ) $4000 This what it say's I don't believe
they made a 24' - ed
MacGregor 25' (1976) $9300
MacGregor 25' (1980) $9000
MacGregor 25' (1983) $9000
Macgregor 25' ( ?? ) $5990
North American(1976) $7800
O'Day 22' ( ?? ) $8500
O'Day 22' (1979) $5900
O'Day 23' (1973) $5900
Paceship 23' ( ?? ) $6500
Paceship 23' (1971) $6500
Rhodes 23' ( ?? ) $5995
Sea Sprite 23'(1965) $4500
Ventura 22' ( ?? ) $4000
Watkins 23' ( ?? ) $6950
|
366.19 | another 2 cents from Alberg land | TILLER::SEARS | Paul Sears, TOP, SHR1-4/d27, 237-3783 | Fri Jul 25 1986 12:58 | 26 |
| i might as well add my 2 cents worth too.
The Typhoon is an excellent daysilor/weekender. It has somewhat low freeboard
and with children on board it's something to consider.
I have a Person Ariel 26' (1965) that i intend to sell this late fall for
around $10k. Not that i'm sugesting you think about this one, but many used
boats are very affordable and will offer you a little more room in exchange
for a little less "newness" and even perhaps a little more maintainence.
The Ariel like the Typhoon and MANY other boats is the classic Carl Algerg
design with full length keel with cutaway forfoot. They are great sailors,
can keep up with a j-24 on a reach and are comfortable when going to
windward, although you might pack an extra snack and beer or two for that.
At any rate the responses to this note should at least indicate there are
as many opinions regarding the best boat as there are sailors!
One of the most fun parts of buying a boat is shopping around. No one boat
will be everything you want. List the five most important attributes of
your boat and look around to find one that satisfies at least 2 or 3 of the
requirements.
good luck, and watch out for lobster pots in Cape Porpoise !
paul
|