T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
18.1 | | GIGI::JCR | | Wed Apr 11 1984 17:33 | 25 |
| I have a Standard Horizon LTD which I am pleased with. According to a
survey conducted by Practical Sailor, the Horizon 25 and Horizon USA
were owned by 35% of all respondents. These units were given a 3.6 rating
(4.0 was perfect) in reliability and performance. This was exceeded only
by Cybernet with a 4.0 rating. Cybernet, Pierce-Simpson, Raytheon, Unimetrics
and President were the next most popular units with a market share of 5%
each. It was pointed out that 5% was actually a very large percentage
in this market which makes the Horizon numbers incredible. There were over
50 types of radios mentioned in the survey.
They also noted that synthesized units were preferred over crystal and that
VHF antenna installation was much a much more important issue than
differences between the various manufacturers.
Anchor Electronics in Hingham has the following prices:
LTD = $188, USA = $238, MAXI = $288.
(Note, these prices were "Show prices", their catalog is higher. I just
looked through 7 or 8 other catalogs and the prices vary widely. You
should be able to dicker with them.)
For some reason, I seem to remember Regency Polaris units being criticized
for reliability and/or warranty problems. But I have no firsthand knowledge.
|
18.2 | | MOTHER::BERENS | | Wed Apr 11 1984 18:47 | 12 |
| Note that in virtually all of the synthesized radios there is no backup
if the phase lock loop fails. Standard, in some of its models, has a
separate crystal for Channel 16. Scoff not, this is important. We took a
wave down the companionway of our C&C26 which splashed our Standard
Horizon 78. After that ONLY Channel 16 worked, which was very nice since
we were well offshore in a bad gale. (Afterwards I washed the front
panel circuits in fresh water and sprayed them with LPS1. Radio has
worked well the five years since.)
Alan
|
18.3 | | GIGI::JCR | | Thu Apr 12 1984 11:19 | 5 |
| Standard make a special note of the channel 16 crystal backup feature in
their "Horizon International" model. I couldn't find any reference to this
feature in the other members of the current line. Unfortunately, the best
discount price I can find is approximately $525.
|
18.4 | | CLOUD9::FRENCH | | Thu Apr 12 1984 17:32 | 7 |
| Since VHFs are under discussion, can anyone give me information on
handhelds - like what typical power output is, are they more expensive
than their larger brothers and is their performance adequate for
within 5 miles of the coast along NH & Maine?
Bill French
|
18.5 | | FDCV02::HOGLUND | | Fri Apr 13 1984 09:50 | 6 |
| Thanks for all the info on VHF's. It looks like
Horizon is the only way to go. I am now looking at
a Horizon USA. Anchor Electronics quoted $239.
Bob
|
18.6 | | GIGI::JCR | | Fri Apr 13 1984 15:57 | 18 |
| You should be happy with the Horizon USA. Just to complicate matters for
you: I've got a stack of 1984 catalogs almost a foot high. Just for curiosity
when I noticed the wildly fluctuating prices for Standard in some catalogs
I went through the whole stack. The $239 quote you received is the very best
price available.
One confusing note. I must have found 20 prices for the USA model. Only
one flyer (ELCO Marine Electronics, Norwell MA) referred to TWO different
models of the USA. One just said 'Horizon USA' with a 'special show price'
of $289. The other was a 'Horizon USA-2' for $254.
I have no idea what the difference in the two units might be. The USA-2
was flagged with a "NEW" label. Possibly it's a better package although
sometimes this just means that the manufacturer has found ways to cut
corners.
John
|
18.7 | | FDCV02::HOGLUND | | Fri Apr 13 1984 16:28 | 3 |
| I found that the USA model had 50 channels. The USA-2 model has
39 channels. The quote was for the Horizon USA-2 model.
|
18.8 | | MOTHER::BERENS | | Mon Apr 16 1984 09:32 | 29 |
| re the question about handheld VHFs:
Yes, they do tend to cost as much or more as the permanently installed
ones. Their power output is usually 5 watts or less.
From your question, I infer you are thinking about using a handheld as
your only VHF. If you are, there are a couple of considerations.
The range of a VHF depends on both power and, even more, antenna height.
On our boat the antenna is about 45' above the water and is fed with low
loss RG8/U coax. We have made a ship-to-shore phone call at 50 miles,
but the reception was marginal. With 5 watts and a deck level antenna I
would guess 5 to 10 miles would be about the maximum range.
It is one thing to try to stay within 5 miles of the coast. It is
another to do it. The weather forecasts are inaccurate enough along the
Maine coast that it is all too easy to be caught in weather quite bad for
a small boat. We spent 20 hours 25 to 35 miles offshore in a bad gale
because we couldn't beat back to the coast.
Also, the Coast Guard stations are not all that close together. The
Rockland and Southwest Harbor stations are some 30 miles apart.
I would recommend a permanent VHF with a good masthead antenna for your
only VHF.
Alan
|
18.9 | | GIGI::JCR | | Fri Apr 20 1984 10:16 | 27 |
| More info on the range of VHF radios. This chart was printed in an old issue
of Cruising World which ran an article explaining how to select a radio.
Height of Xmit Ant 8 12 24 40 60
Height of 8 15 17 22 27 30
Receiving 12 17 20 26 30 34
Antenna 24 22 26 32 37 39
40 27 30 37 42 47
60 30 34 41 47 51
Example: With a transmitting antenna 8 ft above the surface and a receiving
antenna 24 ft up, the MAXIMUM range would be approximately 22 miles.
The article also mentioned that sailboats should never use anything other
than a 3 dB gain antenna. It pointed out that the higher the gain, the more
directional (horozontally) the antenna became. As soon as the boat heeled over
the antenna would be pointing at the sky to windward and to the water to
leeward and range would be reduced significantly.
John
|
18.11 | | MOTHER::BERENS | | Fri Apr 20 1984 14:52 | 14 |
| I too have seen the admonition not to use an antenna with a gain greater
than 3db on a sailboat. However, those doing the admonishing never say
how much reception/transmission is reduced as a function of boat heel.
We have a Metz stainless steel whip antenna at the masthead that
supposedly has 6db gain, and I have never noticed any signal fading or
reduction in range when the boat pitches or heels. The catalog
description for the Metz antenna claims 6db gain with the pattern of a
3db antenna -- sounds like black magic. I also recall seeing a test of
various VHF antennas. There were significant differences in performance
(the Metz did well).
Alan
|
18.12 | | MANANA::DICKSON | | Mon Apr 23 1984 11:47 | 17 |
| Vertical whip antennas all have the same pattern AS VIEWED FROM ABOVE.
That is, circular.
Viewed from the side, variations in gain are caused by how much of
the energy is squeezed down toward the horizon, as opposed to going
up into the sky. If the gain is too high, the beam is shaped like
a disk, and as the boat heels, one edge points uselessly up in the
sky, and the other down in the water.
Note that the effect is only to the sides. The signal ahead and
astern remains the same, unless you are going up and down hills
a lot.
The beam shape difference between 3dB and 6dB is pretty small for
the purposes of this discussion. It isn't like a really FLAT
disk. More like a bagel.
|
18.13 | help finding documentation | MLCSSE::EVANS | | Wed Dec 19 1990 15:44 | 24 |
| I'm looking for any information on these three marine radios I have.
Does anyone have any manuals or schematics? I know it's a long shot.
1. Simpson Model B - circa 1971
Simpson is no longer in business and local marine radio repair
places don't have them that far back. I've already mailed a letter to
Howard Sams, Co.
2. Northern Radio Co. Model N570, and it's 12Volt counterpart.
I have someone checking Seattle Washington now to see if they are
still in business. Circa 1978
3. Raytheon RAY 50A.
I haven't checked to see if they are still in Manchester, NH. if
they are, I'll write them. This one is an early synthesized radio.
thanks,
jim e
|
18.14 | 2 out of 3 ain't bad | MLCSSE::EVANS | | Wed Jan 02 1991 08:42 | 7 |
| This is an update to the previous reply. I wrote to both Northern and
Raytheon and received free of charge the manuals. I guess if you have
an old radio from a company still in business, you're in luck.
Don't throw the old marine radio's in the trash. Give them to a ham.
jim e
|
18.15 | Horizon 25's still going. | BOMBE::ALLA | | Wed Mar 13 1991 14:36 | 16 |
| Just an update on the notes of 7 years ago. I have a Standard
Horizon 25 which I installed in 1977 (xtal set 10 channels + 2WX)
It has a Metz antenna(40' high). When it went in 3 years ago
to get the channel 72 xtal changed, all specs of the radio were
right on. I must give credit to Standard products as this
unit continues to give superior service in the marine environment.
I sail in Buzzards bay and have no problem with receive/xmit from
any place Cuttyhunk to the Canal. (except behind hills in harbor!)
When I brought it in to AirVue (I bought it from them in 1977)
they told me to keep it as it is one of the best sets for
reliability.
Frank
|
18.16 | Question about marine channel allocations | ATSE::VMILLER | Been lookin' kinda SCSI lately | Mon Aug 03 1992 12:26 | 30 |
| This looks like as good a place as any to put this request...
First of all, a favor. I'm not a reader of this conference, so I'd
like to ask that, if you post a reply, you Mail a copy of the reply to
me at opamp::vmiller as well.
I'm helping a couple of friends re-wire their sailboat (a Kels (?) 23')
and I'm a bit concerned about the channel selections on the radio. The
boat (with radio) was purchased from someone who had it parked on the
ocean in Florida. Now, it's gonna be kept in Lake Winnipesaukee, NH.
The radio is a 12-channel crystal rig (maybe 10 marine + 2 WX - I know
there's at least one WX xtal in there). Seems to be functional. I know
I can get new crystals, even if I have to call JAN or International
Crystal and have them made (which isn't too expensive).
The question is: given the fact that it will likely stay on Lake Winni,
what channels should it be loaded with?
A more general question is: what is the allocation scheme for marine
VHF channels? Is there a universal calling frequency/channel number?
How about a universal distress/emergency channel?
Buying a new rig is pretty much out at this time; even though a nice
synthesized radio would be nice...
Thanks in advance.
Vernon (WB9WWE)
|
18.17 | This may not be current | WBC::RODENHISER | | Mon Aug 03 1992 14:03 | 50 |
| Here's a chart of the channel allocation, circa 1987-8. Someone needs to
update this with current information which I don't have available at the
moment.
Channel Xmit Rcv Marine Radiotelephone Channel Usage
6 156.300 156.300 Intership SAFETY and SEARCH & RESCUE
7A 156.350 156.350 Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
8 156.400 156.400 Comm'l Intership
9 156.450 156.450 Comm'l and Non-Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
10 156.500 156.500 Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
11 156.550 156.550 Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
12 156.600 156.600 Port Operations Intership and Ship-to-Coast
13 156.650 156.650 NAVIGATIONAL --- SHIP'S BRIDGE TO SHIP'S BRIDGE
14 156.700 156.700 Port Operations Intership and Ship-to-Coast
15 --- 156.750 Environmental --- Receive Only
16 156.800 156.800 DISTRESS, SAFETY and CALLING CHANNEL
17 156.850 156.850 STATE CONTROL
18A 156.900 156.900 Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
19A 156.950 156.950 Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
20 157.000 161.600 Port Operations --- Ship-to-Coast
22A 157.100 157.100 COAST GUARD LIAISON
24 157.200 161.800 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
25 157.250 161.850 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
26 157.300 161-900 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
27 157.350 161.950 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
28 157.400 162.000 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
65A 156.275 156.275 Port Operations Intership and Ship-to-Coast
66A 156.325 156.325 Port Operations Intership and Ship-to-Coast
67 156.375 156.375 Comm'l Intership
68 156.425 156.425 Non-Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
69 156.475 156.475 Non-Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
70 156.525 156.525 DISTRESS and SAFETY CALLING USING DSC ONLY
71 156.575 156.575 Non-Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
72 156.625 156.625 Non-Comm'l Intership
73 156.675 156.675 Port Operations --- Intership and Ship-to-Coast
74 156.725 156.725 Port Operations --- Intership and Ship-to-Coast
77 156.875 156.875 Comm'l Intership
78A 156.925 156.925 Non-Comm'l Intership and Ship-to-Coast
79A 156.975 156.975 Comm'l Intership
80A 157.025 157.025 Comm'l Intership
84 157.225 161.825 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
85 157.275 161.875 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
86 157.325 161.925 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
87 157.375 161.975 Public Correspondence --- Ship-to-Coast
88A 157.425 157.425 Comm'l Intership
WX1 --- 162.550 Weather
WX2 --- 162.400 Weather
WX3 --- 162.475 Weather
|
18.18 | channel 16 for distress and safety only | MAST::SCHUMANN | Welcome to the new Digital | Mon Aug 03 1992 14:26 | 11 |
| In New England coastal waters, channel 16 is reserved for distress and safety
use only. The general calling channel is now channel 9. This is a new
regulation in effect this year to reduce congestion on channel 16.
I tried calling marinas on 16 twice in June, and was promptly chewed out
("Channel 16 for distress and safety only, use channel 9") on both occasions.
--RS
This rule may not apply on Winnepesaukee. Ask a marina operator for local
details.
|
18.19 | Here's a start | UNIFIX::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Mon Aug 03 1992 16:51 | 38 |
| I reply as a Winnipesaukee sailor who is familiar with the boat and
owners in question.
Presently only channel 16 is being used on the lake for calling. There
seems to be little traffic on channel 9.
I would go with the following:
Ch 16 Calling and distress
Ch 68 Working Channel
Ch 69 Working Channel
Ch 71 Working Channel
ch 72 Working Channel
Ch 11 (if they want to contact Fay's Boat Yard, where they have done
business before)
Also, I am not sure what the N.H. Marine Patrol uses for a working
frequency. I am quite sure they do not (Cannot?) use the USCG 22A and
23. They may use one of the above. Perhaps Channel 06 would be useful.
There is a preferred list of frequencies that are recommended for
boats with a limited number of channels.
95% of what one hears in the lake is 16 plus the working channels
from 68-72. The only useful WX channel is Concord, and it is marginal
on some parts of the lake if the receiver does not have excellent
sensitivity. I condsider this the most important cahnnel I have,
as it has allowed me to scoot to safety from thunderstorms several
times.
Perhaps soemone can fill in a few details like what channel NHMP
perfers to use.
Bill
Perhaps soemone else can give
|
18.20 | The USCG recommended list | UNIFIX::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Tue Aug 04 1992 14:34 | 37 |
| O.K. - here's the promised info:
From the '92 "Eldridge":
The USCG (who has no jurisdiction on Lake Winnipesaukee) requires a
minimum of 3 frequencies, including the first 2 below and strongly
recommends the third:
Ch 16 Distress & Safety
Ch 06 Intership Safety (no routine messages allowed)
Ch 22 Communication w/ USCG. Notices to Mariners braodcast also
Ch 09 Is now virtually required in the 1st District (New England)
and was next on the USCG list of recommended channels anyway
12, 14 Ship to Shore and intership
13 Intership commerical. "Monitoerd 24 hrs /day bu comml"
68, 69, 71, 72 Ship to shore and intership (Pleasure Craft only)
This is where all the chit chat on the lake is. I was
wrong if i suggested ch 70 yesterday. It is for DCS
(Digital Selective Calling ONLY)
24,25,26,27,28
84,85,86,87 Marine Telephone Operator. Not useable on the lake unless
you have the dtmf signalling to remote activate the remote
(from the seacoast) comm facility, and have an account with
them.
The other one I would want for the lake is Channel 11.
I guess I would recommend the following, since we are all subject to
spreading our wings as we become more confident sailors:
16, 06, 22, 09, 11, 12, 14 WX2 (162.40) 68, 69, 71, 72
or perhaps drop 12 and 14 or drop 71 and 72 and add the other 2
weather channels (for when they get beyond Winnipesaukee).
Bill
|