[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference ulysse::pqm

Title:Feedback and reports on the PQM tool
Moderator:AZUR::HUREZ
Created:Thu Dec 28 1989
Last Modified:Mon Apr 14 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:434
Total number of notes:1733

434.0. "PQM and DQS bug?" by SWETSC::WESTERBACK (Panta rei) Sun Apr 13 1997 22:42

    There seems to be a bug in the handling of DQS queues in PQM, or have
    I missed something?
    
    When PQM_STARTUP executes PQM_DQS_QUEUES.COM, I see the message 
    
    %DQS-F-QUEFOUND Queue NKP002LN already exists 
    
    and PQM goes on to the next queue. It seems to me that of course
    the queue exists, it shouldn't disappear at reboot? The problem
    with this handling is that the system logical DQS$REMOTE_NKP002LN
    is not setup because of this. 
    
    I have modified PQM_DQS_IMPORT.COM to fix this:
    
    $ SHOW QUEUE 'local_queue'
    $ ret_status = $status
    $ IF ret_status .EQ. 'jbc$_nosuchque' THEN GOTO queue_not_found
    $ IF .NOT. (ret_status .AND. 1) THEN GOTO queue_error
    $ WRITE sys$error "%DQS-F-QUEFOUND Queue ", local_queue, " already
    exists"
    
    is changed to
    
    $ SHOW QUEUE 'local_queue'
    $ ret_status = $status
    $ GOTO queue_not_found
    
    
    But is there any reason for this handling, or what?
    
    Rgds,
    Hans
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
434.1You are rightAZUR::BERREZMon Apr 14 1997 15:507
Ok, it seems that this test doesn't make sense.
I think that we have never tested that since PQM 4.3 . None of users have DQS queues because
the network printers and printservers replaced them a few years ago .

I note your correction

                  Robert
434.2SWETSC::WESTERBACKPanta reiMon Apr 14 1997 17:3210
    Well, we still have some remaining DQS printers (LN03's) in smaller 
    offices.
    
    The alternative there would perhaps be to set up an IP queue using
    telnetsym, but then we couldn't use PQM at all!
    
    The fix I described  is OK for me.
    
    Rgds,
    Hans