[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | All about Scandinavia |
|
Moderator: | TLE::SAVAGE |
|
Created: | Wed Dec 11 1985 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jun 03 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 603 |
Total number of notes: | 4325 |
236.0. "Old Norse to Celtic?" by WELSWS::MANNION (Legendary Lancashire Heroes) Thu Oct 08 1987 09:53
These notes are taken from the JOYOFLEX conference, though they relate
originally to a discussion in CElT (Can't get through to CELT at
the moment, so I took this one instead). We never got an answer
to this, and went off at a tangent as JOYOFLEX always does. Cand
any readers of SCANDIA help?
Phillip
<<< UCOUNT::DUA4:[NOTES$LIBRARY]JOYOFLEX.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The Joy of Lex >-
================================================================================
Note 366.0 Old Norse to Celtic? 19 replies
WELSWS::MANNION 23 lines 17-JUN-1987 04:10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is some discussion in the CELT notesfile about the origin
of the name Dublin.
One noter says it's from the Gaelic for "black/dark pool", so dubh
+ linn. This seems pretty good, as I know that the sames words (or
their obvious equivalent exist in Scottish Gaelic.
Another says that Dublin comes from the Old Norse words for the
black or dark pool. Dublin was founded by Norwegian raiders in c.
840, so historically this could be correct, but I know of no Germanic
language which has similar words.
Are there any experts in Old Norse out there who can help?
I'm sure that some Norse words would have become loan words in the
languages of the areas they settled, but for the same two to have
been adopted by the speakers of two separate languages, and then
those roots to have apparently disappeared - I find that difficult
to accept without further evidence.
Any views?
Phillip
================================================================================
Note 366.1 Old Norse to Celtic? 1 of 19
MARVIN::KNOWLES 43 lines 18-JUN-1987 08:52
-< Gaelic words, Norse construction >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Theoretically there's one other possibility that doesn't depend on the
extraordinary coincidence of loans outlined in your last para. The
words might be cognate - related through a common ancestor, Proto
Indo-European. Evidence for that would be words related to the Gaelic
words for 'dark' and 'pool' found in ANY other PI-E language group. I
think this is totally improbable.
As you say, Dublin was founded by the Norsemen, and Old Norse did
indeed give Irish Gaelic many loan words. But words left to Irish
Gaelic by the Norsemen related mostly to commerce and the sea. Irish
Gaelic has another (sometimes preferred) way of referring to Dublin:
'Baile �tha Cliath' - the Ford of the Hurdles. So here's an idea:
The city of Dublin was named by the Norsemen, who strung together
two local words. (Alternatively, a Gaelic-speaking collaborator
supplied the name for his Norse overlord - does anyone know
whether the Norsemen used collaborators? I thought rape and
pillage was more in their line.)
Pro
o this would account for the alternative Gaelic name
o this would explain why some people say 'Dublin' is Old Norse -
the components are local, but Norsemen decreed that they shd
make one word - to refer to 'their' new city
Con
o I can't imagine the Norsemen were so sensitive or wise
sensitive - because it implies that they cared about
their victims' linguistic preferences
wise - because it implies that they knew that place-names
are among the most conservative of words. 'Derry'
is still called 'Derry' by the local inhabitants,
although their conquerors (the British) insisted
on a new name - 'Londonderry'
o I'd be very surprised if anyone could find any hard evidence
for the hypothesis
Bob
================================================================================
Note 366.2 Old Norse to Celtic? 2 of 19
DEBIT::RANDALL "Bonnie Randall Schutzman" 24 lines 18-JUN-1987 15:47
-< either is possible >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since Norsemen of various nationalities also settled in Scotland, the
double loan is not quite as improbable as it seems at first blush.
Also, travel between Scotland and Ireland was heavy during the summer
when the weather and the sea were favorable.
The Norse were neither as violent nor as ignorant as they are generally
portrayed; they were generally interested in settling down where they
landed and in learning the local culture. For example, the Danes who
took over Sicily became so thoroughly intermarried and intermixed with
the native Sicilians that by the third generation (the grandchildren of
the settlers) the colonists no longer spoke Danish, only Sicilian.
The Norsemen who settled in Ireland were, typically, interested
primarily in gaining farmland. While a lot of land was taken by
plunder, much more of it was gained by marrying a local (Irish)
woman with a good dowry.) In either case, the settlers usually
adopted local customs.
So the Norse compounding of Gaelic words isn't that improbable either.
I will fish out my linguistic and history books and see what, if
anything, they have to say about this.
--bonnie
================================================================================
Note 366.3 Old Norse to Celtic? 3 of 19
WELSWS::MANNION 10 lines 19-JUN-1987 08:24
-< Foreign Gaels >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re .1
The Norse invaders did indeed use "collaborators". The became known
in both Scottish and Irish Gaelic as "foreign Gaels" (I meant to
look up the original but I had to paint the ceiling instead). The
"foreign Gaels" were considered more fearsome than their masters
in many cases. The Scottish form of this term eventually became
the origin of the name Galloway.
Phillip
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|