| Title: | LSE bug reports | 
| Notice: | Bug reports only; otherwise use TURRIS::LSEDIT | 
| Moderator: | EDSDS6::TOWNSEND | 
| Created: | Fri Nov 21 1986 | 
| Last Modified: | Wed May 28 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 1545 | 
| Total number of notes: | 4941 | 
    A cust is trying to use SCA to document our system.
    
    They started on a small number of BASIC programs by compiling with
    /ANA/DESIGN and loading them into a SCA library.
    
    When they try to generate an INTERNALS report they get a error from LSE
    as follows:
    
    73 lines read from file TRAD$SYS:[FRONT.WORK1]GEN_ATO32.BAS;3
    --- Processing file GEN_ATO32.BAS ---
    --- Processing nonmodules for file GEN_ATO32.BAS ---
    --- Processing routine GEN_ATO32 ---
    Resetting UNDO buffers. Previous operations on this buffer cannot be
    UNDONE
    52 lines read from file TRAD$SYS:[FRONT.WORK1]GEN_BLIP.BAS;2
    LSEDIT internal error.  Error information written to LSE_ERROR.LOG
    Internal error in routine LSE_POSITION_CURSOR_IN_TBCB.  Please submit
    an SPR
    --- Processing file GEN_BLIP.BAS ---
    --- Processing nonmodules for file GEN_BLIP.BAS ---
    LSEDIT internal error.  Error information written to LSE_ERROR.LOG
    Internal error in routine LSE_POSITION_CURSOR_IN_TBCB.  Please submit
    an SPR
    .
    .
    .
    Internal error in routine LSE_POSITION_CURSOR_IN_TBCB.  Please submit
    an SPR.
    
    Should he wait for DECset V12.2 and the UNDO fixes or is it possible to
    workaround this in the meantime ?
    
    Thanks
    ewan smith - uk csc.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1545.1 | EDSDS6::WANG | James - DECset Engineering | Wed May 28 1997 13:47 | 12 | |
| ->Should he wait for DECset V12.2 and the UNDO fixes or is it possible to
->workaround this in the meantime ?
We'll resolve all known and reproducible LSE_POSITION_CURSOR_IN_TBCB
problems in the next LSE release. Without a reproducer from the customer I 
cannot guarantee that we've fixed this problem.  
I don't know if it works but you may try the workaround provided in 
TURRIS::SCA_V2_BUGS 469.7 or 469.8.
-James
                                       
 | |||||