T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
92.1 | A Possible Source | LATOUR::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Mon Jun 16 1986 19:16 | 3 |
| I am not sure, but I believe the IEEE publishes a book on this. I
seem to remember reading an advertisement for the manual in an
IEEE list of publications (which I threw away, sorry!).
|
92.2 | A *little* assistance | CADSYS::COOK | Neil | Tue Jun 17 1986 02:00 | 18 |
| >From .0
> The communications interface between the Test Executive and
> the TIC shall be by standard CIL. All commands from the test stand
> computer are transmitted using the CIL op codes and modifiers in
> 7 bit ASCII. Data values are coded in ASCII decimal scientific
> notation." (what is that???) "All IEEE bus communications between
> the TIC and the main computer shall be terminated by a carriage
> return and line_feed."
An example of ASCII decimal scientific notation is 422357.325 E -23
which is just 422357.325 times 10 to the power -23. This can be
normalized as 0.422357325 E -17 which is the same value with no
significant digits before the decimal point.
The CIL *appears* to just be a way of transmitting commands and responses
in plain text.
Sorry not to be of more help.
|
92.3 | Command vs. Control | USRCV1::CARNELLP | Fanmail from some flounder | Wed Jun 18 1986 04:20 | 14 |
| NASA once had something they called Command Interface Language
(I know it sounds like CLI but it wasn't the same think) that they
used in ground control computers. It was supposed to have been
developed by the Navy. Could your CIL be an outgrowth of this?
CIL was more of a standard way of constructing an user interface
than an implementation language. Most of the systems I worked with
that used it were programmed in Macro-11. It was basically a standard
method of defining satellite (or rocket, or washing machine) binary
command sequences into english-like syllables. The idea was to turn
these long binary strings into pseudo-words that operators could
remember.
Paul.
|