| Title: | Languages |
| Notice: | Speaking In Tongues |
| Moderator: | TLE::TOKLAS::FELDMAN |
| Created: | Sat Jan 25 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Wed May 21 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 394 |
| Total number of notes: | 2683 |
There are a lot of notes in here that have more to do with Ada than with languages in general. Would an Ada notesfile be appropriate? <_Jym_>
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.1 | ALIEN::PETTENGILL | Fri Oct 26 1984 20:25 | 8 | ||
I don't think that these are really ADA issues, but notes on how a new compiler is fairing. If DEC were about to release a new FORTRAN that was about to make a big splash, I would be interested because its a DEC language and not because its FORTRAN. Once the compiler has made its splash, I would like to know what the sales, etc are, but I expect that most mention of ADA in the current fashion will disappear. | |||||
| 41.2 | ORPHAN::BRETT | Sun Oct 28 1984 00:48 | 4 | ||
"Ada" - please. Its not an acronymn, is a trade mark! /Bevin | |||||
| 41.3 | VAXUUM::DYER | Wed Nov 07 1984 14:35 | 8 | ||
I agree that the general compiler and language information surround- ing Ada should be discussed here; but I think there's enough discussion going on in this file (and in the PASNOTES file?) that would best go on in an Ada notesfile. Also, I think an Ada notesfile would be a good idea in its own right; simply because some people shy away from this file (partly due to its description as "language rants and raves"). <_Jym_> | |||||