| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1289.1 | versions? | TLE::WHITLOCK | Stan Whitlock | Thu May 08 1997 09:06 | 8 |
| What version of the compiler are you using and on what version of UNIX? Do
> what /usr/lib/cmplrs/fort/decfort | grep Fort
> uname -a
and show us the output.
Thanks /Stan
|
| 1289.2 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu May 08 1997 21:24 | 3 |
| Version is in the title.
Steve
|
| 1289.3 | Fixed in upcoming compiler(s) | TLE::EKLUND | Always smiling on the inside! | Fri May 09 1997 09:42 | 9 |
| I looked at this one. Yes, the problem is definitely fixed
in the soon to be available compiler(s). It was strictly an
internal error, and it can be avoided by lowering the optimization
level (to 1 or 0) in the meantime. Thanks for providing the
program to reproduce the problem (sure wish everyone did that!).
Cheers!
Dave Eklund
|
| 1289.4 | Thank-you very much. | COMICS::EDWARDSN | Dulce et decorum est pro PDP program | Fri May 09 1997 12:49 | 9 |
| > Thanks for providing the
> program to reproduce the problem (sure wish everyone did that!).
Thanks for taking the time to try it out.
I would have thought fixing a compiler fault without the code to
raise the error was almost impossible, but then we expect nothing
but genius here and always get it.
Neil.
|