[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::decladebug

Title:Digital Ladebug debugger
Moderator:TLE::LUCIA
Created:Fri Feb 28 1992
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:969
Total number of notes:3959

946.0. "Cmopare LADEbug to SGI Debugger" by SWAM1::POIANI_MI () Fri May 02 1997 13:25

    I am in a competitive situation against SGI. Of course the folks are
    familiar with SGI development tools, and they like them alot, a
    favorite is the SGI debugger.
    
    Does anyone know how Ladebug compares to the SGI Debugger?
    
    I also wonder if someone knows how DEC-FUSE stacks up to the SGI
    environment?
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
946.1TLE::LUCIAhttp://asaab.zko.dec.com/~lucia/biography.htmlFri May 02 1997 13:4910
    Not that I am aware of.  I wanted to see how SGI did some things last
    year and I couldn't find a machine in the company, never mind the
    software to try.
    
    We would be interested in your results.  What we have heard under the
    guise of marketing hype, is the SGI debugger is much more eye-catching,
    with neat-o bells and whistles.  Whether it actually does more or not
    is unknown.
    
    
946.2We have to know?SWAM1::POIANI_MIFri May 02 1997 14:456
    I don't understand how we can build and develop products without
    knowing the competition?
    
    Who is the product manager for our Ladebug/CASE tools?
    
    
946.3Maybe a third party like TotalView?SMURF::PETERTrigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertaintyFri May 02 1997 19:0219
    I'm sure that SGI has a very impressive debugger and that we do not
    compare well.  You have to remember that they are orientated towards
    visualization and graphics.  The tools they have to do that are
    comparible to AVS if you are familar with that product.  I used to 
    work with the company that eventually became AVS and got to play 
    around with plugging things together to get various visual 
    representations of data.  You can do some pretty amazing things and
    as a debugger person, I could envision how it would be fairly straight
    forward to plug some of the visualization stuff right into the 
    debugger, which, from the few ads I've seen, is probably what they are
    doing.  I would not want to base a sale on the comparison of the 
    two debuggers unless you wanted to restrict it simply to the ability
    to handle languages.
    
    I don't see FUSE adding a lot to this, but it may be somewhat more
    comparible.
    
    PeterT
    
946.4What about base functionality?SWAM1::POIANI_MISat May 03 1997 11:065
    Visualization is one thing... kind of flashy. I am looking to see if
    our debugger can at least do most if not all of the SGI's debugging
    capabilities.
    
    
946.5GERUND::WOLFEI'm going to huff, and puff, and blow your house downMon May 05 1997 12:068
Tim,

We have an SGI box here in UNX. If the debugger is bundled with base
system then we have it. We might have it even if it's not. You
could try using it accross the network (might be some font issues to 
work through though). Send mail to [email protected]. 

			pete