| Title: | Digital Ladebug debugger |
| Moderator: | TLE::LUCIA |
| Created: | Fri Feb 28 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 969 |
| Total number of notes: | 3959 |
Using DEC C++ 5.6 and ladebug 4.0-33:
In this test program, "Base" will not have a full DST entry, but
"Derived" does. Trying a "whatis Derived::Derived" causes ladebug to
seg fault.
========================================
class Base {
public:
virtual int frob() = 0;
};
class Derived: public Base {
public:
Derived() { return; }
int frob() { return 0; }
};
main()
{
Derived t;
return 0;
}
========================================
ladebug a.out
Welcome to the Ladebug Debugger Version 4.0-33
------------------
object file name: a.out
Reading symbolic information ...done
(ladebug) whatis Derived::Derived
Ladebug Debugger Version 4.0-33 caught signal "Segmentation fault"
(11).
This is an unexpected condition and may indicate the presence of a
defect.
If you wish to report this, please include the stack trace that
follows.
Diagnostic stack trace ...
0x12572f1c
0x12482fdc
0x12483d40
0x12483f64
0x12485514
0x12485b0c
0x122d34cc
0x122c6554
0x1227467c
0x1223b964
0x12226dd4
0x12216b5c
0x12213c0c
end of diagnostic stack trace.
Fatal error: Segmentation fault
- Matt
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 890.1 | side note | DECC::MJHANS | Matthew Hanselman, DEC C/C++ | Wed Mar 19 1997 12:06 | 4 |
As an aside, this is the only problem I've found with the new C++ V5.6
class-completion support. Things are looking pretty good....
- Matt
| |||||
| 890.2 | I'll take a look | TLE::MERRITT | Steve Merritt, Ladebug Team | Wed Mar 19 1997 14:06 | 2 |
I'll take at look at this... | |||||
| 890.3 | fixed | TLE::MERRITT | Steve Merritt, Ladebug Team | Thu Mar 27 1997 09:10 | 1 |
This has been fixed in 4.0-34 | |||||