[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Digital Ladebug debugger |
|
Moderator: | TLE::LUCIA |
|
Created: | Fri Feb 28 1992 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 969 |
Total number of notes: | 3959 |
857.0. "BACKWARD-QUESTION-MARK in output" by ADA9X::BRETT () Fri Feb 28 1997 10:56
ladebug 4.0-30
notice the BACKWARD-QUESTION-MARK in the following output from ladebug.
[It really is a single BACKWARD-QUESTION-MARK character but I don't know
how to type that]
It makes me think ladebug is actually putting out trash at this point.
If it were on the next line, I'd look at our debugging info more thoroughly
but because of it being on the end of the line, and because the second
dump doesn't show the problem, I'm more inclined to blame ladebug.
/Bevin
(ladebug) p *rout->next->type
struct a_type {
source_corresp = struct a_source_correspondence {
dec_supp = 0x140589a0;
assoc_info = 0x0;
name = 0x0;
<deleted to save space>
typeinfo_var = 0x0;
variant = union <generated_name_0044> {
integer = struct <generated_name_0045> {
int_kind = '\300';
explicitly_signed = 1;
enum_type = 0;
wchar_t_type = 1;
bool_type = 0;
avoid_codecenter_warnings = 1;
enum_info = union <generated_name_0046> {
constant_list = 0x140498f8;
affiliated_type = 0x140498f8;
}; BACKWARD-QUESTION-MARK
};
float_kind = '\300';
pointer = struct <generated_name_0047> {
type = 0x140495c0;
base_variable = 0x140498f8;
<deleted to save space>
(ladebug) p rout->next->type->variant
union <generated_name_0044> {
integer = struct <generated_name_0045> {
int_kind = '\300';
explicitly_signed = 1;
enum_type = 0;
wchar_t_type = 1;
bool_type = 0;
avoid_codecenter_warnings = 1;
enum_info = union <generated_name_0046> {
constant_list = 0x140498f8;
affiliated_type = 0x140498f8;
};
};
float_kind = '\300';
pointer = struct <generated_name_0047> {
<deleted to save space>
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
857.1 | | TLE::MURRAY | Wanfang Murray | Fri Feb 28 1997 10:59 | 4 |
|
We will look into this.
Wanfang
|